Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 β€’ 34 tweets β€’ 15 min read β€’ Read on X
Hearing Alert: π…πšπœπžπ›π¨π¨π€ 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐒𝐚 π‚π‘π’πžπŸ'𝐬 𝐏π₯𝐞𝐚 𝐒𝐧 𝐒𝐂

Supreme Court to hear plea by Ajit Mohan @secondatticus ( @Facebook India Head) challenging Delhi govt panel summons to him regarding role of the social media portal in #DelhiRiots2020
#SupremeCourt
Facebook India chief has submitted that the Delhi Assembly's committee does not have the Authority to compel him to appear before it, since the same issue was already before a parliamentary panel.
@AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal @LtGovDelhi @raghav_chadha
.@secondatticus is set to argue that
"is no law that empowers a State Legislature, including a committee formed by that Legislature, to take coercive action against any person unless it obstructs or impedes its legislative functions."
#DelhiRiots

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Aniruddha Bose and Krishna Murari assembles.

Hearing begins.
SC poses a question.

The power in respect of these actions do not vest with these bodies, is that the point?
Senior Advocate Harish Salve for petitioner argues.

Salve: We have received two summons. I have two independent points

1. Privilege does not extend to this kind of inquiry
2. You cannot put me in the pain of punishment by asking me to appear.

#SupremeCourt @Facebook
(Salve reads the summons issued to Ajit Mohan by the Committee which requires his presence to "testify" and for his opinion)

Salve: I don't know whether they want him as a witness or an expert.
Salve: We wrote a letter on 13th September saying withdraw your summons you don't have the power.

(Salve reads the acknowledgement received in response of this letter where Mohan's presence was required again)

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020 @secondatticus @Facebook
Salve: Privilege is something to be decided by the Assembly. A committee cannot decide whether action on privilege can be taken or not.

(Salve highlights that non presence of Mohan was said to be deemed as "breach of privilege" in the summons)

Salve: This is a serious threat.
Salve: Important points we make are two fold ~

- I have a right u/A 19, and
- The Right to free speech includes right not to speak.
Salve: As a house you may decide whatever you want to do but if I do not want to participate and give my views before the Committee then... And please consider I work for a US based company. I do not want to comment on this politically sensitive issue.
Salve: Wall Street journal has accused Facebook of favouring a certain party but I don't want to get into all this.

My Constitutional rights under Articles 19 and 21 are violated when I am forced to come on oath and give my views.
Salve: As a house they may form whatever committee to look into an issue but when they are forcing me to come on oath and give me views and opinions and testify at the threat of punishment, this is completely contradictory.

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020 #Facebook
Salve: The moment you come to an inquiry of this kind, it is an inquisition and where is the authority of law?

A.14, 19 and 21 is clearly engaged.

(Salve now refers to Article 239AA(3) in relation to the special status for the NCT Delhi)

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020
(Salve argues that Public order and Police are two subjects that stand excluded from the power and authority of the Delhi Legislative assembly)

Salve: The disputes so far have centred around the power to make laws.
(Salve is referrong yo Articles 194(3) and 194(4) in relation to Powers, privileges, etc, of the House of Legislatures and members and committees)

Salve: In a constitutional framework such as ours, can a person be punished summarily without a proper trial and absent legislation
Salve: There is no question of recognising an action that impinges upon one's Article 21.

If you want to impinge on my rights then it has to be with the authority of law.

(Salve refers to the tests of laid down in Maneka Gandhi case)

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Salve: Breach of privilege is not exception under Article 19(2). Contempt of court, yes.

Justice Kaul: What is proposition you are making for which you are citing the judgment? We cannot decide this issue finally at this point which is why we posed the question.

#SupremeCourt
Salve: I have only two points to make

Does privilege extend to areas such as this?

If it does, is it compatible with my A.19 rights?

(Salve adds that no coercive action should be taken against Ajit Mohan)
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi for @Facebook is now making submissions.

Rohatgi: He (Ajit Mohan) is not being summoned because he made some comments. He is being summoned because he is an employee of my client (Facebook)

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020 #Facebook
Rohatgi: If he (Mohan) does not go before the committee, it is not breach of privilege.

I personally as a lawyer have been called by Parliament for giving opinions number of times.

You cannot compel and say non appearance will be breach of privilege. There is no penalisation.
Rohtagi: They (the committee) have held a press conference where they declared Facebook guilty.

(Rohtagi reading the transcript of the press conference where Facebook was said to be "prima facie involved" in inciting violence)

#SupremeCourt #Facebook #DelhiRiots2020
Rohatgi: In the press conference they said that incriminating material was not taken down. If it was not taken down, then everyone has right to move the Court for it.

Everyday Facebook is told to take down material that is in violation of the laws. They could have gone to Court.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi is now arguing on behalf of the Respondent.

Singhvi: The case they are trying to make out, cannot be made out.

Justice Kaul: As far as notice is concerned, we are going to issue it. You argue on protective order or relief to be given or not.
Singhvi: Privilege and coercion is projected to get orders from My Lords.

Justice Kaul: You have given them the chance to by sending the orders (summons)

#SupremeCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Singhvi: Their whole petition is focussed on Articles 19 and 21.

Justice Aniruddha Bose: Article 19 can apply to Petitioner 1 (Ajit Mohan) because you are compelling him to say something.

#SupremeCourt #Facebook #DelhiRiots2020
Singhvi: This person is called ONLY AS A WITNESS and no coercive steps...

Justice Kaul: If you are trying to change the legal tenor then it must be in those terms. You may have to take a stand for this Committee... You may have to file an affidavit to clarify this.
Singhvi: The points I am making that can be taken on record are ~

1. only as a witness
2. No coercive action
3. Reason Facebook is called, not as an accused, but want to get safeguard measures from them as to how the platform will not be misused.
Singhvi: He is only being summoned as a witness.

Justice Kaul: This is not what you have said in the notices. You have advised them, advise them better and issue better notices.
Singhvi: I will rectify the order and address the deficiencies that are bothering My Lords.

Justice Kaul: I'm sure you will be able to remedy the notice. And in that press conference, if you have said those things, then you will have to take a stand.
Singhvi argues that the transcript of the press conference read out is misleading because it intended to show that Facebook was misused.
Singhvi urges the Court to record his submissions and points out that Ajit Mohan was required to be present before the Committee today at 3. On account of the hearing, the meeting is deferred.

Singhvi assures the Court that he will file an affidavit addressing all the issues.
#SupremeCourt issues notice on Ajit Mohan's petition.

Court gives one weeks' time to the respondent to file counter affidavit.

Supreme Court records that the Committee will not hold a meeting qua this petition till further orders.

Matter to be heard next on Oct 15.
[Breaking] Ajit Mohan was summoned as a witness, without threat of coercive action: Delhi govt's Peace & Harmony Committee; SC issues notice @Facebook @secondatticus @AamAadmiParty @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots2020 #delhigovernment #Facebook

bit.ly/33RAeoD

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

May 23
Ceremonial bench proceedings underway to mark the last working day of Justice Abhay S Oka

AG R Venkataramani: All of us got equal treatment in your court. I have cherished the questioning moments. By working so tirelessly you have set bad standards for your law clerks as some even forgot to go home..Image
SG Tushar Mehta: Despite such an irreparable loss you treated duty as a judge first. You could have addressed virtually also. This shows duty. Please spare more time for family. You have often been much more prepared than lawyers. Your lordships services are required and please do not close any door
.
SG: you may not believe in God, but i believe, May God be always on your side. Me and ASG Raju were almost always at the wrong side of the judgment ..but our love and respect for you was never affected. We respect your for who you are.
Read 32 tweets
May 21
Delhi High Court to shortly hear a defamation suit filed by Newslaundry Executive Editor Manisha Pande and eight other women journalists against Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for referring to them as β€˜prostitutes’ and their workplace as a β€˜brothel.’ Image
Advocate Bani Dixit appears for Newslaundry journalists. She says "Plaintiffs are journalists from all walks of life. These are defamatory articles outside the bounds of criticism. These are all working women."
Court: What does the defendant do ?

Dixit: The kind of things he has said I cannot read it out also.

She reads out the allegedly defamatory portions
Read 14 tweets
May 21
[Arrest of Ashoka University Professor]

Supreme Court to shortly hear a petition challenging the arrest of Ali Khan Mahmudabad, an associate professor at Ashoka University, Sonipat, over certain remarks onΒ Operation Sindoor

#AliKhanMahmudabad
#OperationSindoor
@AshokaUniv
#SupremeCourtofIndiaImage
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal to argue for Mahmudabad

#AliKhanMahmudabad
#OperationSindoor
@AshokaUniv
#SupremeCourtofIndia
@AshokaUniv Sr Adv Sibal: Please see page 46 which has the statement on the basis of which criminal culpability is attributed

#AliKhanMahmudabad
#OperationSindoor
@AshokaUniv
#SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 21 tweets
May 20
[Waqf Hearing in Supreme Court]

Supreme Court bench led by CJI B.R. Gavai would hear the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on May 20, for the limited purpose of interim relief

#SupremeCourt #WaqfAct Image
The bench will consider whether interim relief of stay is required on three issues - waqf by user, nomination of non-Muslims to the Wakf Council and State Waqf Boards and identification of government land under waqf #WaqfAct
The Central government had earlier told the Supreme Court that certain key provisions of the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, including the formation of the Central Waqf Council and Waqf Boards and provisions on de-notifying properties already declared or registered as waqf, will not be acted upon for the time being.
Read 36 tweets
May 16
Supreme Court hears a plea stating Rohingya refugees were thrown into the sea

Justice Surya Kant: Everytime you have a new story. Now how is this beautifully crafted coming from

Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: this is the 38 persons deported and then they were taken to Andamans and then were put in the sea with life jackets

Justice Kant: who was clicking the videos and photos? How did he come back ? What is the material on record ? We did not see anything at night.Image
Justice Kant: when the country is going through such a tough time you bring up these fanciful petitions.

Gonsalves: Then there was call made from Myanmar

SC: We know how these calls are made of Jharkhand etc and numbers of Myanmar, Dubai etc are shown

Gonsalves: Govt can probe. One of the deported called from Myanmar.
Justice Kant: Where is this corresponding averment in the submission regarding this annexure. Show us that.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 16
#Bombay High Court is set to shortly hear stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra's plea seeking quashing of the FIR filed over his 'Gaddar' remark allegedly directed at Maharashtra Deputy CM Eknath Shinde.
@kunalkamra88 Image
A bench of Justice Sarang Kotwal and Justice S M Modak had earlier adjourned the matter to today, April 16, after taking note of the interim protection granted to Kamra by the Madras High Court.
On April 7, the Madras High Court had extended Kamra’s interim protection from arrest till April 17, while hearing his transit anticipatory bail application.
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(