So with China aiming for carbon-neutrality by 2060, there’s a number of things to unpack here 1./ euractiv.com/section/energy…
It vindicates EU policy decisions on its own 2050 net-zero pledge. Back in 2018, the Commission was torn between 80%-90% emission cuts and going all in on net-zero euractiv.com/section/climat…
More progressive officials won that battle, arguing that the likes of China, India would be unlikely to be spurred into action by a policy that closely resembled business as usual
China’s 2060 pledge can also be viewed in the same way as the space-race. Climate policies are becoming prestigious and a race to the top is emerging more and more
A lot hinges now on who wins the White House in November. A Biden presidency creates a strong climate bloc that might be able to create a virtuous circle of green policies
Four more years of Trump will likely sour that effort. Another question now is where is Russia in all this? The world’s 4th largest emitter will have to come to the table at some point
Scrubbing emissions only between 2050-2060 is by most readings not enough to honour the Paris Agreement. Hope then that the rate of tech progress will overtake policy making and lead to early achievement of targets
Because: articles like this? [insert ‘only tip of the iceberg’ pun here] bbc.com/news/science-e…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧀 CHEESE WAR UPDATE:
EU court says Denmark is breaking the law by allowing its cheesemakers to sell products called 'feta'. Feta is a protected foodstuff that can only be made in certain areas of Greece
Denmark had claimed that its 'feta' was only for sale in non-EU countries, so no rules were broken. The court confirms that this is bogus and protected food norms still apply
Still no statement by Danish @Statsmin Fette Medriksen
If this isn’t a resigning matter I don’t know what is
💶 Auditors say the EU Commission overstated its climate spending by *€72BN* between 2014-2020. The watchdog fears that this discrepancy could be repeated for the current period [...]
The Commission said €216bn - 20% of the budget - had gone toward climate action. But spending was often overstated according to a new report. The main sector where the figure is overblown? Agriculture, by some *€60BN* [...]
By applying "more reasonable coefficients" the auditors say that just 13% (€144bn) was spent on climate action in that budgetary period [...]
🇫🇮 Finland aims to be carbon-neutral by 2035. But nurturing nature (~75% of the country is forest) and exploiting it at the same time is proving to be a difficult or even impossible ask
🌲 New data suggests Finland’s forests emitted more CO2 than they absorbed last year. Logging and slow tree growth probable causes. You can’t build climate targets on carbon sinks if your sinks aren’t doing their job
🌳 This is what happened to the Amazon last year. There, a mixture of logging and fires (deliberately set to clear land for farming) are the causes
🌱 THREAD on the cartoon/comic world’s climate change progress.
1. Tintin. Massive carbon footprint. Constantly travelling via inefficient means, just look at that plane tech. Also is potentially in the pocket of petrostate officials
2. Asterix. All-boar diet isn’t great and the Gauls are always chopping down trees to make palisades. The village arguably delays the Roman industrialisation of agriculture though. More progress needed
3. Flintstones. Mobility is pretty sustainable but Fred’s job at the quarry suggests heavy industry emissions and I don’t see any CCS tech deployment in Bedrock