James Doleman Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 24 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Afternoon proceedings begin at the Julian #Assange hearing in London.
Prosecution calls Seena Fazel
Professor of Forensic Psychiatry at the University of Oxford.
#Assange
Fazel focuses on the relationship between mental illness and violent crime, the mental health of prisoners, and violence risk assessment. He is also a specialist in prison suicide.
Fazel says his diagnosis is that #Assange is "moderately depressed."
Confirms that his report concludes Mr Assange’s mental condition is not particularly severe.
Edward Fitzgerald QC rises to cross-examine the witness (as before I won't be posting any evidence that deals with private medical information)
The defence QC notes that the witness did not see Mr Assange in the period when other experts have stated his mental health was worse" but after he came out of isolation "it can go up and down?" Fazel agrees.
The witness confirms that isolation and solitary confinement is a "risk factor," in mental health, as is a long sentence.
#Assange
Fitzgerald moves on to Special Administrative Measures (used in US prisons for prisoners they see as high risk)
If this occurred, he would be isolated from other prisoners, limited contact with the outside work
1
Asked if this could make Assange's mental health worse, he replies "yes," but adds he would need to know more about the specific situations but agrees there was a "risk."
Fitzgerald asks about Assange in an American jail, "He's alone he has limited contact with the outside world, his telephone calls are monitored, he has bleak prospects do you would agree their would be a heightened risk?"
Fazel agrees.
Adds that mental health is "multi-factorial," and it would also depend on what treatments were available.
Fitzgerald suggests that if Assange is seen as a security risk he would not have access to any therapeutic programmes in a US prison.
The witness says he can't comment
Fazel says he is "not an expert in US prisons."
The witness says he can't comment as he is “not an expert on US prisons,” and is “only superficially familiar with the literature,"
You are not able to assist us much on this issue are you, defence counsel comments.
Fazel agrees his report says that #Assange has some "autistic type traits."
Fazel agrees he not an expert in autism and that Quinton Deeley (who the court heard from this morning for the defence) is.
Asked about the case of Gary Mckinnon, who the UK court's refused to extradite to the USA partly because he was autistic, Fazel says yes, but adds "he is not an expert."
The defence suggests that Fazel does not have the knowledge to contradict the evidence we heard this morning that Assange had Aspergers Syndrome as he was not an expert in that field

"I'd like to focus on what I said," he replies.
Witness says he visited two US prisons not a “supermax,” jail of the type Assange is likely to be placed in.
“You're not able to assist us that area then,” Fitzgerald says, and ends his cross-examination.
#Assange
James Lewis rises for the US government, says that Assange would, before trial, be held on remand in a Virgina prison which he said, "did not have solitary confinement."
Lewis says if Assange was convicted he would be sent to NDX SAMS Colorado SuperMax prison, says every inmate has access to a small television showing educational and informative programes selected by the staff.
He also describes other benefits of the Supermax jail, including arts and crafts, and access to videogames
"He also says that there are also educational courses prisoners can take such as "7 habits of highly effective people." and "Channelling the artistic spirit."
#Assange
The witness says that sounded good but he would have to see how it worked in practice.
Witness finishes his evidence, and leaves the court, court adjourns for 10 minutes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Doleman

James Doleman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamesdoleman

Apr 25, 2023
Why did the Sun/News of the world hack William and Harry so much?
A thread.
Royal news and gossip was a staple of their output, but their problem was that, in 2006/2010 the younger members of the family, who the public was most interested wouldn't cooperate, as they blamed the press for Diana's death
Their Royal reporters were also mostly middle aged men in suits, they wouldn't exactly blend in at the London nightspots the young set hung out at
Read 7 tweets
Apr 23, 2023
Neither of the places are in England ImageImage
Keir Starmer
"I've been out and about wishing everyone in England a happy St George's day. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Sorry all, audio breaking up a bit so can't tweet this part properly
Counsel for Harry says that while the Home office may not have been formally informed they would have been aware of his offer
Says that the language used in the article that this was a "crushing rebuttal," to Harry was inflammatory language.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Counsel now going over emails sent to the Mail on Sunday to Harry's solicitors asking if they wanted to "comment or guide," them on their planned article.
Counsel, Harry had only made the offer to pay when the judicial review was already in progress.
Says "That's the basis of what the criticism [in the article] was about
Read 13 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Judge enters, as motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers resumes
Begins by saying that the case from Harry's counsel "undermines a newspaper's right to comment."
Adds that the dismissal of the defence of "honest comment," ignores it's width
Read 15 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Back at court (by video link) for a motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers.
Not sure what I'll be able to report, but will let you all know what I can.
This is one of a series of similar cases, here my colleague .@danevanswrites reports on the latest on Harry V Mirror Group Newspapers
bylinetimes.com/2023/03/16/pri…
Court rises as Mr Justice Nicklin, the presiding judge, enters.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(