Drew Holden Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 24 tweets 31 min read Read on X
The Kavanaugh hearing was a clarifying moment for countless conservatives because it revealed the depths to which the other side will sink in order to get power.

I don’t think most conservatives need a reminder, but in case you‘ve forgotten...

🧵Thread🧵
We saw how eager the media, Dems, and others were to push baseless claims to destroy someone without evidence.

They’ll make a monster out of you for clicks. That includes @thedailybeast, @NBCNews, @Newsweek, @KamalaHarris, among countless others. ImageImageImageImage
They’ll take unsubstantiated claims and level accusations against you as if they were already true. Elected officials, members of the media, thought leaders, and beyond would attack you from all sides.

@CoryBooker, @USATODAY, @greenhousenyt, @NYTimesCohen , @JaneMayerNYer ImageImageImageImage
Even the future Democratic Vice Presidential nominee would be involved. @KamalaHarris ImageImageImage
These attacks and general skepticism will only apply to you, of course. Your accuser will get only fawning coverage. Here’s @nytimes and one of their opinion columnists, @michelleinbklyn. ImageImage
They’ll amplify conspiracy theories and baseless accusations against you without making any pretense of vetting them first.

Here’s @NYMag, @HuffPost, @CNBC, and @ajplus (or don’t you remember the ‘fifth’ accuser?) ImageImageImageImage
And they’re happy to do it to the tune of a seedy snake oil salesman, a charlatan and a fraud.

When @MichaelAvenatti comes knocking with invented allegations, they won’t hesitate to run with them.

Here’s @politico, @voxdotcom and @TIME. ImageImageImage
You’ll see countless editorials, op-eds, thinkpieces and more where complete strangers assail your character in the strongest possible terms.

Here we’ve got @JillFilipovic, @JohnBrennan, @tedlieu and @CharlesMBlow, who called Kavanaugh a “lascivious predator” ImageImageImageImage
They’ll write “straight news” pieces that treat the situation as if the baseless claims have already been confirmed.

@RollingStone, @businessinsider, @AP, @nytimes ImageImageImageImage
Rather than have a shred of incredulity when the most ridiculous of allegations, pushed by an outright fraud, come to light, they buy the claims hook, line, and sinker.

@tribelaw, @JohnWDean, @DavidCayJ, @qz ImageImageImageImage
Hard to overstate how pervasive this phenomena was.

Here’s @CNBC’s White House reporter @christinawilkie running with the entire allegation. ImageImageImageImage
I needed an entire tweet to highlight @SethAbramson, who said of @MichaelAvenatti and his invented claims “the man plans to run for president; my gut tells me he doesn’t go public with these allegations unless he’s got some pretty compelling witnesses and evidence” ImageImageImageImage
Even their fact checkers will push unverified allegations that would eventually be referred for prosecution. Here’s @CNN’s @ddale8. ImageImage
The truth of it doesn’t matter at all. If it bleeds, it ledes.

Here we’ve got @GQMagazine, @nytimes, @VICE and @CNN ImageImageImageImage
Are you getting the picture, here?

@tedlieu, @tribelaw, @MSNBC, @CNN ImageImageImageImage
They’ll assassinate your character over the meaning of slang terms you used decades ago in high school.

Here we’ve got @BuzzFeedNews, @voxdotcom, @VICENews and @Slate. ImageImageImageImage
They’ll publicly crucify you for the crimes of others, or the crimes of a system. Here’s @voxdotcom ImageImage
And if you dare protest - if you push back with even a hint of frustration as you see your good name dragged through the mud - you’ll have that used as a mark against you, too. Here we have @JohnBrennan, @MSNBC, @MalcolmNance and @lithub. ImageImageImageImage
Really hard to overstate how frequent this line of criticism was.

I wonder if @NAACP, @NickKristof, @JoyAnnReid or @peterdaou could envision why someone would be angry for having their character picked apart on baseless claims? ImageImageImageImage
And then they’ll demand you complete yet another background check - after you’ve passed SIX of them - if you want any hope of convincing them.

Plenty of voices from the Senate got involved, including @RonWyden, @SenSchumer, @ChrisCoons and @SenSanders. ImageImageImageImage
And even if you make it through the entire ordeal, with your reputation forever sullied without evidence, they won’t stop.

Some of the most powerful people in the country will continue to heckle you and call for your head.

Here’s @ewarren doing just that. ImageImageImageImage
So, conservatives, my question to you is this:

Are these the people and institutions you think you can trust and count on? Are these the parties you think you can negotiate with on a new SCOTUS Justice? Are these your good faith partners?
Because I, for one, have had it. I’m not interested in another round of this bad faith insanity.

Put on your armor. Hold the line. Do your jobs.

#FillTheSeat
And my (unsolicited) advice to Dems (and the media): ignore the lessons of the Kavanaugh hearing at your own peril.

Nothing brought together the conservative coalition the way that it did.

But a remake of it with a new justice certainly will.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Apr 15
🧵Thread🧵

I’m not sure people realize just how egregious some of NPR’s “journalism” has been. Amid the debate about defunding the network, I wanted to walk down memory lane to revisit some of its worst coverage.

There’s a lot. ⤵️
First, perhaps the most egregious display of activist journalism: their response to the Hunter Biden laptop story of corruption involving a major party candidate on the eve of the election.

Not only did @NPR not cover it, they bragged about refusing to do so. Image
Insofar as @NPR did cover the Hunter Biden scandal, they actively tried to cover it up.

They applauded Facebook & Twitter strangling the story as part of a push against “misinformation and conspiracy theories.”

The story, of course, turned out to be far from invented. Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(