Marilyn Marks Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
In the New Yorker article linked below, @rickhasen made this statement. Rick, do you see the parties actually prepared to do this? If the Dems, Libertarians, Greens, Unaffiliated candidates would actually exercise their rights, the problem would be mostly solved. 1/
2/ The article quoted above is newyorker.com/magazine/2020/…
3/ We must not act helpless. These are OUR elections and we have all rights to insist on full transparency for counting every vote. We must convince members of the press, candidates and parties that it is a patriotic duty to oversee our elections with meaningful scrutiny.
4/ Choosing to blindly trust the process to be a "good American" is not being a good American. It is our duty to oversee the election and document both the good and the discrepancies, and insist on correction of discrepancies on the spot---which creates a defensible election.
5/ With lots of witnesses as to the fairness and accuracy of the election, it ensures a defensible election. We need to be sure that we exercise our full rights to be witnesses and insist on active observation from the press as well.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marilyn Marks

Marilyn Marks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarilynRMarks1

Jul 4
Coffee County again! It appears that the Bd. of Commissioners is trying to block the Bd. of Elections from initiating an independent investigation of the massive voting system breaches.

We wrote the community:
⬇️

🗳️ 1/ conta.cc/45PCKeu
Image
2/ The theft of the voting system software that Trump's allies arranged and paid for has never been meaningfully investigated.
Sec. Raffensperger and St. Elec. Bd told the federal court in 2022 that there was "active and ongoing" investigation, but that was false!
3/ SOS investigator testified in court that he was told to "open a file, but hold off" on actually investigation. No investigation was done.

Eventually, they gave it to GBI to do criminal part of the investigation, but did nothing on the security issues or civil violations.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 27
The debate about the Fulton Co. lawsuit on certification continues to lack context of how GA elections work. The progressive groups opposing the fundamentals of this lawsuit may be find it backfires on them. They really don't want what they seem to be asking for here. 1/
2/ Yes, while certification is SUPPOSED to be "ministerial" and required if there is an accurate canvass of votes, the opponents don't understand that GA doesn't have meaningful canvassing. An election board should NOT just blindly sign whatever pops out of the machines!
3/ The Sec. of State office has no required forms or procedures for canvassing. We often see that the number of voters is not reconciled to the number of ballots. It is not unusual to find AFTER certification, stray memory cards of ballots or ballots left in scanner not counted.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 8
GA Runoff Voters--Head's Up! 🔔🚨

GA voters are getting alerts in top right corner of their MVP's like below. For many voters, the message is NOT TRUE. ✖️ Ineligible voters are getting this message too.

Why did SOS do this? 🤷‍♀️ Ask him.
1/ Image
2/ You can vote in a runoff contest in the same party you voted in during the May primary. You cannot switch parties for the runoff. If you voted only nonpartisan ballot or did not vote, you can vote in either party's runoff. For example....
3/ If you voted a D ballot in May, but the only county runoff is the R sheriff's primary, you are not permitted to vote in the runoff. If you voted an R ballot or nonpartisan ballot, or did not vote at all, you CAN vote in the R sheriff's runoff.

It may require some research.
Read 7 tweets
May 22
Coffee County has uploaded no results as of 10:45.
And Bibb County has not uploaded Mail ballots or early voting.

Is this is any way related to the recent cyberattacks?
Image
Image
2/ Also both Coffee and Bibb have had highly restricted voting system software put in the hands of unauthorized actors. But no one has really investigated to figure out if there was damage to the system.

Maybe it is just coincidence, but they shouldn't have to guess!
3/ It is REALLY hard to get good information on what exactly is happening, so it is hard to guess from afar why these two recently attacked counties are not able to report results.
Read 4 tweets
May 9
Many damning documents re: Coffee voting system software theft have still not been extracted from Coffee Bd. and their attorneys, Hall Booth Smith. We've made massive efforts to get the Court to force production and sanction them.

Latest brief 1/ ⬇️
…altionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/public/share/w…
Image
2/ Everyone has seen the infamous videos of the intruders starting the first breach:
11alive.com/article/news/p…
3/ But it took months of chipping away at the Hall Booth Smith "inaccurate" representations that the videos did not exist to finally secure and publish them.

Their reckless and sketchy claims of disappeared videos and emails caused massive delays.
Read 4 tweets
May 9
2020 election vote counts should be behind us. But Raffensperger & St Elec Bd continue to conceal facts unnecessarily escalating the controversy.

They create more suspicion and doubt. They claim they don’t know what ballots were counted in the Fulton.1/

georgiarecorder.com/2024/05/07/geo…
2/ It’s very likely that Biden still wins handily if the Fulton votes were accurately counted. However, SOS and SEB are too embarrassed and timid to find out and prove it. It only serves to undermine confidence.

SEB should have insisted on independent review of this complaint.
3/ It’s a flat out lie that they cannot determine whether the ballots were included in the official tally. We @CoalitionGoodGv have done it many times.

Why did SEB accept this inaccurate “finding?”

This sets up 2024 for more controversy and bitterness.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(