Dr Colin Mendelsohn Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/There is so much wrong with this article

▪️Only anti-vaping views quoted
▪️Extensive misinformation not challenged
▪️No alternative views offered

Can I have a right of reply @Dana_Adele

Thread...
smh.com.au/politics/feder…
2/ nicotine is highly addictive

The addictiveness of nicotine depends on how it is delivered. Smoking is highly addictive due to rapid nicotine delivery and other chemicals in smoke. Vaping is significantly less addictive than smoking
3/ doctors should be focused on getting people off cigarettes and nicotine completely

Ideally yes. But many smokers can't quit nicotine and switching to a safer alternative is lifesaving. The focus of #THR is reducing disease, not ceasing nicotine

bit.ly/3iZko1F
4/ Effectiveness is not proven

What?
A recent meta-anaysis of RCTs found that vaping is 70% more effective than NRT bit.ly/304SfyK. Effectiveness is supported by observational studies, population studies and declines in national smoking rates

bit.ly/3hX5ojm
5/They actually get young people into smoking

If there is a gateway into smoking from vaping it is very small. The motorway out of smoking is much greater
The benefit to public health in helping smokers quit far exceeds any potential gateway in

colinmendelsohn.com.au/wp-content/upl…
6/ it might be 'just' better than smoking

What!
There is OVERWHELMING evidence that vaping is FAR safer than smoking due to a dramatic reduction in inhaled toxins, biomarkers and clinical improvements
bit.ly/2G0T5FE
7/ And the dangers are really quite profound

What dangers?
Not one person has died from nicotine vaping yet 8 million die every year from smoking. Serious effects are extremely rare
8/ doctors would face a difficult task assessing if patients
have another motivation to vape

Vaping by non smokers is rare, <0.7% in Australia. Regular vaping is almost exclusively used by smokers to quit or reduce smoking or reduce harm from smoking

aihw.gov.au/reports/illici…
9/ No products are TGA approved

This is because nicotine liquid is not a medicine. It is a consumer product designed to replace another consumer product, deadly smoking. No western country requires medicines-standard assessment by the Medicines Regulator
bit.ly/365HShQ
10/ The aim has got to be to get the patient off the nicotine addiction

No. The aim is to reduce the death and illness from smoking. Nicotine dependence on its own is of relatively minor importance. Once the patient has stopped smoking, your job as a doctor is over
11/ a potentially harmful poison

All chemicals are 'potentially' harmful. Vaping nicotine is substantially less risky than smoking which it replaces. Harm from low concentrations of nicotine liquid for vaping is extremely rare
12/ The most important thing is calling the Quitline

Quitline helps some people, but was used by only 1.8% of Aussie smokers in 2019. Vaping is by far the world's most popular quitting aid and has a much higher reach and pubic health impact
13/ all of the nation's peak cancer bodies oppose vaping

Why?
Vaping has <0.5% of the cancer risk from smoking. Nicotine does not cause cancer. Carcinogens are greatly reduced compared to smoking and biomarkers are much lower in vapers

Suggest @CR_UK bit.ly/30146xS
14/ a potential pathway to smoking by youth

▪️The evidence does not support a significant pathway
▪️Most youth vaping is experimental
▪️Smoking usually precedes vaping
▪️Regular vaping rare in never-smokers
▪️Vaping diverts young people FROM smoking

bit.ly/3mMkOL1

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Colin Mendelsohn

Dr Colin Mendelsohn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ColinMendelsohn

May 30, 2023
🧵1/9
Everyone agrees young people should not #vape or smoke
However, the current fear and panic about youth vaping is not based on the evidence, according to our paper published today in @ijdrugpolicy
Co-author Prof Wayne Hall

colinmendelsohn.com.au/youth/
🧵2/9
In adolescents who have never smoked most #vaping is occasional and short-term
Frequent vaping in this group is uncommon: 1-2% in most international surveys eg England ⤵️ Image
🧵3/9
Rather than being a gateway into smoking, #vaping is diverting young people AWAY from smoking overall. Increased vaping is accompanied by an accelerated decline in youth smoking
Eg in the US ⤵️ Image
Read 10 tweets
May 29, 2023
🧵1/4
41 leading tobacco control and addiction experts from Australia and NZ have written an open letter to Health Minister @Mark_Butler_MP asking him to reconsider the proposal to further restrict access to nicotine #vaping
colinmendelsohn.com.au/butler-4/
🧵2/4
Their concern is that
“this approach will have serious and harmful unintended consequences for public health, will slow the decline in smoking and will ultimately be unsuccessful”
🧵3/4
The experts say that "a well-designed adult consumer regulatory model is most likely to achieve the two goals we all seek, i.e., making vaping products available as a quitting aid for adults who smoke and minimising access by young people"
Read 5 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
WARNING. AUSTRALIAN nicotine is extremely toxic!

According to @TGAgovau's latest advice

'Nicotine is a poisonous substance'
'There are significant health risks associated with nicotine use

We should get the safe nicotine that other countries use...

1/6
tga.gov.au/nicotine-vapin…
UK Royal College of Physicians

‘Use of nicotine alone, in the doses used by smokers, represents little if any hazard to the user’

2/6
rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outpu…
UK Royal Society for Public Health

‘Tobacco contains nicotine along with many other chemicals, but nicotine by itself is fairly harmless.’

3/6
rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/…
Read 6 tweets
Jun 15, 2021
Appalling journalism @dailytelegraph

'Vape Craze, A Real Drag' 11 June 2021

Gross misinformation from 2 anti-vaping activists. No pro-vaping expert consulted to challenge or correct

No response to my letter to editor to fix it, so here are my corrections

Pls share

Thread...
1/ 'Switching has not been shown to reduce proven health harms’

Response
NASEM 18-2: 'There is substantial evidence that completely switching from ... cigarettes to #ecigs results in reduced short-term adverse health outcomes in several organ systems'
nap.edu/24952
Read 7 tweets
Jun 12, 2021
Good to see some balance in this article with some commonsense from @AlexWodak

However still some serious misinformation
FYI @janehansen2000
1. #vaping is not a Big Tobacco plot

-BT did not invent vaping
-Vapes are a direct competitor to cigarettes and are a huge disruptive threat to the industry
-BT is mostly focussed on #HTPs
-If BT switches from #cigs to #ecigs, that is good for public health. vaping is 95% safer
2. Popcorn lung has been long discredited

There has never been a single case of 'popcorn lung' from vaping or smoking, and diacetyl levels are hundreds of times higher in smoke than vapour

@CRUKLondon laid this to rest years ago
bit.ly/3iBt6Wk
Read 9 tweets
Jul 27, 2020
1/4 BULLSHIT ALERT

@SarahWhisar from @quitvic says the claim that vaping is 95% safer than smoking is a guesstimate from a workshop

FACT
It is based on comprehensive, peer-reviewed reviews of the scientific evidence by @RCPLondon and @PHE_uk
bit.ly/30NQ0PO
2/4 "95% safer" is a realistic evidence-based estimate to guide the public on the relative risk of vaping compared to smoking

Research shows switching
▪️dramatically reduces toxins
▪️greatly reduces toxic biomarkers of exposure
▪️improves health

athra.org.au/blog/2019/12/2…
3/4 Why don't @quitvic and @CancerCouncilOz support vaping?

▪️Smoking is the largest risk factor for cancer
▪️Vaping is estimated to be <0.5% the cancer risk of smoking
▪️Most of the carcinogens in smoke are absent from vapour or in very small amounts

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778971
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(