Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice UU Lalit to shortly hear the plea filed against the Bombay HC order which dismissed the petition seeking for interim bail on medical grounds of lawyer-activist Sudha Bharadwaj
#NIA
#SupremeCourt
#SudhaBhardwaj
Bharadwaj’s counsel Ragini Ahuja had earlier told the Bombay HC that the activist had been in jail for over two years.

Ahuja had said Bharadwaj had comorbidities that put her at a higher risk of contracting the virus. #COVID19
NIA counsel, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, argued against giving bail to Bharadwaj saying that if her condition required hospital care, the state would provide for it.
Singh had further informed HC that 81-year-old co-accused, Varavara Rao, who was admitted to a state-run facility and then a shifted to the private hospital - on intervention of the National Human Right's Commission - for treatment of COVID-19 and other ailments in July.
Hearing begins.

Senior Adv Vrinda Grover for petitioner : I am in custody since 2 years as an undertrial. charges are not proved. i am only seeking interim bail

Justice Lalit: please check the medical report
Grover: Sudha Bharadwaj is suffering from diabetes and comorbidities

Justice Lalit: she is 58 and is not severely diabetic

Grover: she has developed two diseases in custody. one is a heart disease which is a ticking time bomb. it needs a cardio profile, lipid profile.
Grover: Let me get the check up done. She has also developed arthritis. She has never abused any court order.

Justice Lalit: What is the case
Grover: there is a criminal conspiracy which is set to be hatched by her. she was practicing in bilaspur HC. It is nobodys case that any material is recovered from her but from someone else's phone.

Justice Lalit: Why don't you file a fresh bail plea?
Grover: there is one pending in HC

Justice Lalit: So the application on merits is pending.
Her sugar is 114 and not so serious

Grover: our contention is the heart disease
Justice Lalit: but that is not a part of this plea

Grover: She is suffering osteo arthritis and cardiac issues and this she has developed while in custody. (reads the medical report).

Justice Lalit: the HC order says the medication is in order
Senior Adv Grover: I only seek your indulgence to get checked. These tests cannot happen in the jail hospital

Justice Ajay Rastogi: She was examined on August 20 by jail authorities

Grover reads the medication being given to her by the jail hospital
Justice Rastogi: are you saying this report is false? You have a good case on merits. why don't you file a regular bail application

Justice Lalit: Either you withdraw it or we will dismiss it
Justice Lalit: the condition deserves a deeper look and a regular bail plea can be filed.

Plea dismissed as withdrawn
"You have a good case on merits, why don't you file for regular bail?", Supreme Court says; Sudha Bharadwaj plea for interim bail dismissed as withdrawn
#SudhaBharadwaj #SupremeCourt
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Nov 10
Attorney General for India R Venkataramani to shortly make submissions before Supreme Court on the case challenging the validity of the Tribunal Reforms law #SupremeCourt Image
AG addresses individual applications first. CESTAT, ITAT etc
AG: there has been detailed deliberations within the government. We have also submitted a note.
Read 16 tweets
Nov 8
Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends the Inaugural Session of National Conference on 'Strengthening Legal Aid Delivery Mechanisms' and Celebration of 'Legal Services Day'
#SupremeCourt @PMOIndia Image
CJI BR Gavai, CJI Designate Justice Surya Kant, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal present on dias @arjunrammeghwal #SupremeCourt @PMOIndia Image
@arjunrammeghwal @PMOIndia Justice Surya Kant: As demand for equal and affordable justice evolved, the enactment of Legal Services Authority act was a decisive moment

#SupremeCourt @PMOIndia Image
Read 15 tweets
Nov 7
Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath to shortly deliver the AK Sen memorial lecture, 2025. Image
Justice Nath: I am dumbfounded whether or not to deliver this memorial lecture, because after hearing all the interesting anecdotes and episodes and about the life of Mr. Sen, of which I have neither been associated, acquainted, or known, like Mr. Bagchi is from Calcutta, Dr. Singhvi remembers back to his father's time with Mr. Sen, Mr. Jayanta Mitra also has so many. If they could have continued, I would have enjoyed more. But since I have been assigned this job of delivering the lecture, I think now the boring part starts. All of you will have to suffer me and listen to this lecture, which is a scripted one…. I don't have anecdotes to narrate. If I could be excused, I would be very happy and request all the panelists to continue with some more. And I would say that my lecture is delivered….Reasons to follow and we can go ahead.
Justice Nath: People often call AK Sen the inevitable law minister. By that, they mean he was the person you naturally turned to when the country needed someone sensible to steer legal reform, someone who could talk to courts, to parliament, to the government, and to citizens without raising the temperature. He combined a lawyer's eye for detail with a public servant's instinct to explain and include. His promise showed early. At the age of 26, he authored a book on commercial law. It was endorsed by his senior, Sri Sudhiranjan Das, who would later become Chief Justice of India.
Read 27 tweets
Nov 7
Madras Bar Association case challenging the validity of the Tribunal Reforms Act

Senior Advocate Arvind Datar to make submissions today

CJI BR Gavai: Let us see if Attorney General appears at 2 pm. He had said he will

#SupremeCourt Image
Sr Adv Arvind Datar: This case started 34 years ago in 1991 so as to say.

CJI: AG attempted to make submissions on the merits of the provisions.

Datar: 50 years eligibility, 4 years tenure and search cum selection committee... These are the three areas..now for 50 years.... It is about giving a chance..

CJI: see I became a judge at 42, maybe I did not have adequate experience at that time

Datar: I don't want to commit contempt

Justice Vinod Chandran: order of a 50 year old tribunal judge will be dealt by a 45 year old High Court judge !
Senior Advocate Arvind Datar: typically an additional secretary is something which a candidate becomes at 50 ..... The best tribunal ITAT which functioned for so long and model followed throughout.. but now we have dismantled it in a very perverse way. No empirical evidence to show that 50 is the best entry age. Justice Ravindra Bhat devotes 14 paras why 50 should not be cut off and when you make a law you must see what SC has said.Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 3
Stray dogs case: Supreme Court to continue monitoring compliance of Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023 in various states.

Chief Secretaries of all states except Delhi, Telangana, and West Bengal to appear before the Court today with compliance affidavits for their respective states.

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV AnjariaImage
All Chief Secretaries present in Court.

Sr. Adv. AM Singhvi: your lordships may limit entry only for this case. It’s really difficult to come in.

Justice Nath: I had suggested an auditorium…. Who appears for Andhra Pradesh? What’s your explanation? Why was no affidavit filed on the previous date?

CS Andhra Pradesh inaudible.

The Court reviews affidavits.
SG Tushar Mehta: all states have filed compliance affidavits.

Justice Nath: all states have filed their compliance affidavits. Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu have not filed.

Singhvi: many of the vital facts are not stated in the affidavits, number of ABC centres, number of dogs sterilised, budget allocations, unless these parameters are known it is not be possible to deal with it state wise. Some of my colleagues have done the exercise, they may make a chart..

Counsel: we’ll take the affidavits, make a chart.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 27
Supreme Court hears plea pertaining to appointment of information commissioners.

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi Image
Adv Prashant Bhushan: this is regarding appointment to information commissions. It has been 10 months from the last order. There are so many orders asking to appoint and the pendency is just skyrocketing. The RTI is being destroyed by not appointing information commissioners.
Bhushan: earlier what they had done is they air dropped one person, a journalist who was singing praises of the government and without any qualifications he was air dropped.

Justice Kant: sometimes people don’t apply. We can’t doubt everything. We exercise suo moto powers in case of senior designations because people don’t apply.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(