ابنِ خان Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
MOCKING THE RELIGION

Allāh táālā states:

“If you ask them, [why they said so] they will reply, ‘We were jesting and were being playful.’ Tell them: ‘Do you make fun of Allāh táālā, His verses and His Messenger?’ Do not proffer excuses –
you have disbelieved after having professed faith.”

[Tawbah, 9:65-66]

Imam Yaĥyā Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī al-Shāfiýī [631-676 AH / 1233-1277 CE] writes in Minhāju’t Ţālibīn:

“[Among] actions that cause apostasy: any deliberate action which explicitly mocks religion.” ImageImage
Imām Ibn Áābidīn al-Ĥanafī al-Shāmī [1198-1252 AH / 1784-1836 CE] writes in Radd al-Muĥtār:

“I say: It is obvious that if the indicators of mockery or slighting [religion] are found, that person will be ruled
kāfir; even if he has not intended to mock or slight [the religion].” Image
Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] writes in Mustanad al-Mútamad:

“The well-researched position is what we have mentioned many times: the difference between kufr and ikfār; something being kufr and ruling someone a kāfir because of it. Image
It is kufr near Allāh táālā when belying or mocking [religion] is established [near Allāh táālā] and this does not require evidence at all, let alone absolute proof or evidence that Essential precepts [has been denied].”
Meaning, if a man mocks or belies any sacred symbol or person, the person becomes kāfir near Allāh táālā even if we do not have evidence to rule such a person kāfir.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ابنِ خان

ابنِ خان Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IbneKhan01

Nov 23, 2025
The two narrations quoted here to prove music being a major sin are not authentic:

1. The first is weak
2. The second is false

A ruling as serious as calling something a major sin cannot be built on weak and false reports. Here are the details ⬇️
1/

The first ḥadīth:

“Two sounds are cursed… the flute at a blessing, and the wailing at calamity.”

— Musnad al-Bazzār (7513)

Al-Bazzār: “We do not know it from Anas except through this chain.”

And the problem?

Only one narrator carries it: Shabīb ibn Bishr al-Bajalī.Image
The scholars of ḥadīth weakened Shabīb ibn Bishr al-Bajalī:

al-Bukhārī:

“Shabīb ibn Bishr is munkar al-ḥadīth.”

Ibn Ḥibbān:

“He makes many mistakes.”

Abū Ḥātim:

“He is layyin al-ḥadīth.”

A lone weak narrator = the report is ḍaʿīf.— al-Tirmidhī, al-ʿIlal al-Kabīr, pg. 392
— Ibn Ḥibbān, Kitāb al-Thiqāt, vol. 4, pg. 359
— Ibn Abī Ḥātim, al-Jarḥ wa’l-Taʿdīl, vol. 4, pg. 357
Read 10 tweets
Nov 30, 2023
Many Muslims incorrectly assume slavery is not a "good" thing. It is, and if it was not, then Allāh would not have permitted it, and His Beloved Rasūl ﷺ would not have engaged in it.

They erroneously assume that because freeing one's own slaves can be rewarded, that this somehow means slavery as a whole is evil and ought to be abolished.

Firstly, not all instances of freeing slaves are rewarded, it is only rewarded if done sincerely for the Pleasure of Allāh, otherwise if a person frees a thousand of his slaves without this sincere intention, then though it is valid, there is no reward.

Moreover, if a kāfir does so, there is no reward for him, regardless of his intention.

Secondly, a person is rewarded for giving charity if he does so purely for the sake of Allāh, but does this now mean private property is evil and must be abolished? Must governments take all wealth of individuals by force? Of course not.

In reality, this is modern-day apologetics designed to suit 21st century sentiment regarding slavery and has no basis in traditional Islam.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 11, 2023
.:Alahazrat Mega-thread:.

Today marks the day that one of the greatest Sunni scholars of India left this world: Alahazrat Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Hanafi Qadiri Baraylawi [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921]

Here is a thread of some of my threads regarding him ad translations of his writings Image
His detailed definition and discourse regarding worship:

Refutation of the claim that he supported the British:

Read 96 tweets
Jun 17, 2023
One may be under the impression that the medieval Mu'tazilah were opposed to slavery, however this is not the case.

Rather, the author brings 19th century reformists and describes their approach as being impacted by Mu'tazili tradition, though I'm not sure how.

The same book: ImageImage
So yes, "Anti-slavery fight is a modern idea, Islam unanimously agreed with this this practice, this is the consensus", this is correct.
I don't know why people struggle with the historical fact that wholesale demonisation of slavery and opposition to slavery in the Muslim world is a recent occurrence thst began in 19thC and that for centuries nobody of any group or sect had any issue with slavery in of itself.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 16, 2023
"Homosexual"

The term "homosexual" is a neologism, coined in the late 19th century by pro-sodomy activists

Such classification is recent and was done in order to present sodomites as being a separate oppressed class. Image
The first who conceptualised an identity was German lawyer, jurist, journalist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs [1825-1895].

Prior to this, the focus was on the act of the individual, whereas activists such as Ulrichs shifted the focus towards the nature of the individual. Image
In 1867 he attended the Congress of German Jurists in Munich and argued for the repealing of laws which prohibited sodomy, mentioning that nature had implanted this inn them, and thus such laws are discriminatory against them. Image
Read 26 tweets
May 22, 2023
Fatāwā Bareilly Sharīf: Khilāfat vs Democracy

Answer:

The one deserving of Khilāfat is he who possesses the seven conditions of Khilāfat, that is:

1. Man,

2. Sane,

3. Pubescent,

4. Muslim,

5. Free,

6. Capable,

7. Qurashī ImageImageImageImage
These seven conditions are necessary such that if even one condition is missing then the Khilāfat shall not be sound. The elucidation of this is in all books of creed.
Imām Taftāzānī says in Sharh al-Aqā’id:

“{He ought to be from Quraysh, and it is not permissible from other than them} meaning, it is stipulated that the Imām be a Qurashī due to his saying, upon him be blessings and salutations, ‘The Imāms are from Quraysh.’
Read 44 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(