[1/n] Preparing everything to respond to the question: "Under our isolation epidemic model. Is it possible to correct government policy mismanagement starting at the end of July in 90 days for Madrid, Catalunya and a few other cities?" What do you think? Answers in an hour or so.
[2/n] For those that are new to this thread, you can prepare and hone your skills in modeling with the Harmless Virus Game:
[3/n] And the more difficult but also important for this new thread "The Vaccine Gamble" game:
[4/n] Here we go.. Let's start modeling Madrid, shall we? This is how we expect it to look like if we guide ourselves with the news. Lockdowns start, but young people will rebel to it causing a milder outcome.
[5/n] If the current course of action is maintained. They will have masks on, but at the same time, people are not enforcing them within their bubbles (like it happens in Buenos Aires). No freaking out when you have 50 deaths per day in Madrid.
[6/n] We showed before that Madrid is suboptimal against the vaccine gamble. But let's explain a few other features that a particular graph is telling us (which may not be evident at first sight).
[7/n] That means that no matter what you do if you didn't start optimal all the deaths you accrued are your new baseline. Future trajectories are tainted by your decisions (sound about like life). So we have a few 90-days options.
[8/n] Why do you think the green trajectory is so different between moderate and Sweden like restrictions to vulnerable?
[9/n] As you can see, all of the above. You need lesser interaction between the groups, less isolation on healthy would lead to faster spread on the healthy denying reservoirs.
[10/n] Trick question: Would any of the following optimum strategies be attainable in an ethical way without asking the healthy for help?
[11/n] Why is this question important? Mainly because the government has pushed Madrid into a situation where the only optimal strategies left are based on 'negative isolation' of the healthy. Has anyone said COVID-cruisers or COVID-parties were inherently bad? The counterexample
The problem is that to be able to equalize the scales the spreading pattern has to be so biased toward having a higher than native R0 for the healthy. That effectively is a non-solution. Do you think we could do it for 180 days?
[13/n] We can in 180, if and only if, the vulnerable are willing to sustain yet another 180 days of mitigations while all the rest do whatever they please. And even in that case is not guaranteed, because of fear healthy may not like to go out.
[14/n] How about Catalunya? It has sort of the same restrictions that Madrid had. Would they be able to pull it out?
[15/n] Interestingly enough, if you look closely the vaccine gamble is still a go until the end of October. Realistically, given the assumptions, it is still a no. They can't win, but at least they have a probable ethical area with an expected outcome that is not that bad.
[16/n] How about Stockholm? Can we beat "A Tegnell" somehow?
[17/n] Well if you think that you probably would require to mitigate until August 2021 and have a vaccine by then. Nahhh, I would claim that if our model is correct, he WON.
[18/n] Now this opens a few questions. If trajectories are so sensitive to what the government mandates. Shouldn't the government be liable for damages if their policies would harm a vulnerable which was expected to be very careful?
[19/n] Yes, it can be calculated. And more, the results don't look so good for the governments that decide to follow suboptimal paths if put on trial. We will talk about it someday. /END
TEASER...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Federico Andres Lois

Federico Andres Lois Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @federicolois

7 Nov
1/ The first rule of Lockdown Club is: You do not talk about deaths per million. The second rule of Lockdown Club is: You do not talk about deaths per million.
2/ Third rule of Lockdown Club: someone yells Sweden or herd immunity, you point out the other Nordics. Fourth rule: only two metrics to a discussion, cases and cases.
3/ Fifth rule: one lockdown per season, fellas. Sixth rule: no deaths, no herd. Seventh rule: lockdowns will go on as long as they have to.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
Controversial opinion: those that say its not possible to shield the vulnerable, also won't be able to prove if there is a difference (or lack of it) between the trajectory of the virus at Madrid and Stockholm. Who do you think has let it rip?
1/ There were many "Eureka" moments while working on our paper, but probably the most important of all happened pretty early. Non-linear models are highly sensitive to:
2/ We decided early on to eliminate as many parameters as possible. Location parameters are simple to fix, they are location parameters. Viral parameters also, you can go and say R0=3.3 and you made a choice. How many parameters are left if you do that?
Read 32 tweets
13 Oct
1/ Our preprint with @LDjaparidze is online at @medrxivpreprint
"SARS-CoV-2 waves in Europe: A 2-stratum SEIRS model solution"
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/ We extended the SEIRS model to support stratified isolation levels for healthy <60 and vulnerable individuals.
3/ We forced the model to predict daily deaths curves and the reported age serology ratio for key metropolitan areas in Europe. The immunity level estimations obtained were: Madrid 43%; Catalonia 24%; Brussels 73%; and Stockholm 65%.
Read 11 tweets
2 Oct
0/n Thank all of you who participated in 'The demon game'. I am taking a screenshot because when knowing the whys it loses all value (there is no more asymmetry of information). These 182 responses are 'The sample'.
1/n You may have already known about this thought experiment you just run on, mainly because there are many different variants of it in the literature. This is the one that I have seen lately:
2/n This example is good because the results are clear-cut to show 2 typical sources of error. Poor experimental setups are the bain of our existence and there are myriad ways they can go wrong.
Read 13 tweets
1 Oct
I have my badge of honor. At this rate, the fat tail event is there won't be more twitter to block. :D Image
For context, this is why he got mad with me.
And I love the depth of the rebuttal. Image
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
The arrival of a vaccine in the context of COVID can be modeled using game theory as a gamble over the expectation of the final death toll. Most countries will have negative payoff after August 2020. Change my mind. cc @LDjaparidze
Let's make it more interesting... Do you agree?
Context is king. For a gamble to exist we need to define clearly the parameters to observe the likely expected result. Let's start with vaccine efficacy (VE). What do you think is the range most manufacturers are looking for?
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!