When CleanBC was announced we were told government would close 25% gap to meet our legislated emissions gap within two years. Then they dumped hundreds of millions into fracked gas & LNG expansion. In fact 79% more $ to Oil and gas than Christy Clark’s government. THREAD #bcpoli
Honestly didn’t see that coming. I get that being the government to actually get LNG built feels good to the NDP because it’s a way to stick it to the Liberals and an easy way to look like they are creating economic opportunity. But, it ignores the market trends 2/
Price of fracked gas and LNG is low and lots of other big plays in the market before us are struggling. Also, ya gotta wonder, if it’s such a big bet why does it need a billion dollars of tax payers money to get off the ground? 3/
It also of course ignores the science @IPCC_CH showing we need all industries and all countries to bend curve of emissions now. And science showing that we underestimated gas methane emissions so it’s not a better long term bet than coal and its displacing large scale renewables
Most important for this hot moment though is that I think the @bcndp@jjhorgan@GeorgeHeyman@geoffmeggs and others are betting we forgot that 25% promise. And that we will turn a blind eye to how we can’t meet our climate targets because fracking & LNG
They fail to understand that for a number of us it’s not just another issue. It’s THE issue. We actually mean it when we say climate emergency & when they plan to fudge the numbers, sneak around buying credits instead of reducing emissions or increase fracked gas....we notice
It’s remarkable how well they have led during COVID. Listening to the science. Acting early. Listening to the science on climate means planning for fossil fuel reduction of emissions and production now and investing heavily in adaptation and economic diversification
So to those of you writing the @bcndp platform - where is the 25%? Will you stop fossil fuel subsidies especially the deep well credit & put in place bond measures so we stop paying for their mess? Where is the plan for wind down and a just transition for gas workers? #bcpoli
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s get something straight about fossil fuel phase-out: renewables needn’t replace all the coal, oil and gas we use today bc most of it is just used to produce and move those fossil fuels around!
We only need to replace the useful energy: 37% of what we currently produce 🫨🧵
Just want to emphasize this. Fossil fuels are only 37% efficient.
In other words, 63% of the oil, gas, and coal we extract goes to waste in the production, refinement, and transportation process
Moving fossil fuels around is responsible for 45% of shipping traffic globally. That’s $42 billion per year on moving fossil fuels (mostly LNG) around 🤯 🫠 🫣
🧵 What we have been seeing in the #cop28 negotiations can be summarized as the good, the bad, and the ugly. 1/6
The good: many countries have had strong statements in support of a phase out of fossil fuels in line with science and the 1.5ºC target, and a full phase out of fossil fuel subsidies. 2/6
The bad: terms like 'phase down', 'unabated' and 'inefficient'. These are not just terms, it's a tactic being used by the fossil fuel industry to ensure that they can continue to grow production despite clear science on the need for *absolute* emissions & production decline. 3/6
🚨💀Lethal heat, heat extremes beyond human experience just some of the terrifying terms and definitions in new research just out by scientists at Penn State & Perdue.🧑🔬
Climate change will expose billions to heat & humidity so extreme their bodies simply cannot cope.
🧵 1/19
They took new “survivability limit” measurements for heat and humidity, and combined those with climate models.
The results are profoundly disturbing. Humanity is *much* more vulnerable than we previously thought.
2/19
There’s a limit to what the human body can handle.
“Uncompensable heat stress” happens when it’s no longer possible to cool down. Core body temperature rises continuously.
This is already happening in some places but will increase dramatically as we breach 2°C or 3°C.
No a carbon tax won’t stop wildfires but it helps. Let me spell out the connection for you. Close to 90% of the emissions trapped in our atmosphere causing climate change are from oil, gas and coal. 🧵#cdnpoli
These pollutants trapped in our atmosphere creating a blanket that smothers the earth. This in turn heats up the earth causing extreme weather, flooding, droughts and yes more extreme and frequent wildfires. 2/
Numerous scientific reports have warned of a surge in severity and frequency of wildfires due to climate change 3/ nytimes.com/2022/02/23/cli…
Exxon Mobile claims carbon capture tech can wipe its excessive emissions clean. But that's a dirty ploy to keep expanding fossil fuels in a world on fire (and get even more subsidisies to do it.) 🧵
See for yourself. Even the oil giant's own sustainability report indicates how inflated and fantastical these claims are. Carbon capture (in red) nowhere near compensates for rising ad reckless fossil fuel emissions.
CCS is a delay tactic used to ramp up production. It does nothing to reduce the 80-90% of emissions generated from a barrel of oil downstream at the customer end. It does nothing to capture other pollutants. nationalobserver.com/2022/09/27/opi…
Oil companies are raking in billions in profits that they're using to lobby govs into funding more oil projects that will make higher profits (and kill us all) and we’re still inviting them to climate negotiations to be *checks notes* ...realistic??? 🧵
In my reality, here on Earth, the planet is rapidly warming because of fossil fuel emissions and we’re running out of time to fix it. We need strong action to transition to 100% renewables.
The oil companies themselves won’t get us there. Just look at their track record.
Big Oil has raked in billions in the past year while the rest of us were weighed down by rising costs of food, energy, and housing. They’ve profited off an affordability crisis, proving the only thing that matters to them is their bottom line. theguardian.com/business/2022/…