Peter Foster Profile picture
Sep 28, 2020 13 tweets 14 min read Read on X
🚨🍞🧅🍖🧀🐏🐂🐓🚨Q: are there enough vets to deal with Brexit food exports red tape after Jan 1??? Govt says yes...industry and vets not so sure. My latest via @FT 1/thread
on.ft.com/3kSmPUd
@FT Why do we need vets? Because deal or no deal all agrifood produce going to EU (or NI) will need an "export health certificate"...that requires a 'wet stamp' from an Official Veterinarian at a cost of £200-£900. /2
@FT The government estimates that the number of EHCs could increase from 60,000 now to anywhere from 100,000 to 300,000 - that's a huge spread, and it speak to uncertainty on this issue. /3
@FT Last week Defra boss @MPGeorgeEustice told the Select Cmme that there was probably enough capacity. The top Defra civil servant Tamara Finkelstein said she was "confident" there would be enough to meet demand.
Watch here from 15.06 /4

parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/ab…
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice The government says that it has boosted the number of Official Veterinarians from 600 to 1,200 from since Feb 2019 and added more than 100 support officers.

It will also use govt vets from APHA to supplement if "push comes to shove" - though not clear what duties they'll drop/5
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice So is that all good? Well, not according to the British Vet Association @simondocvet and its members who tell @FT that time is running out to prepare and the lack of clarity is raising real concerns in vet/meat industry. /6
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet .@dominicgoudie from @Foodanddrinkfed is similarly concerned as his members will need to get these 'wet stamps' and while there might be enough capacity in some parts of the UK it is NOT clear if that will create capacity where it is need. /7
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed Secondly, the problem is that Official Veterinarians (OVs) are also regular vets - doing farm animals or small animals - so if they are pulled into certifying goods for trade, they will need to take time out from elsewhere. They can't be magicked out of thin air./8
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed Then there is dispute about need. The Govt @MPGeorgeEustice estimates it will need "200 fulltime equivalent" vets, but experienced certification hands like @JasonAldiss reckon they'll need about 350 - truth is, its difficult to know. /9
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed @JasonAldiss Then there is the question of how prepared industry is to export to the EU - so a lot of 'rest of world' agri exports are frozen. But not so for the EU...so that requires a different set of capacities. /10
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed @JasonAldiss For example animals must be kept on the same farm for 40 days before slaughter; have valid TB test; be corralled separately in abattoirs...loads of other stuff that stakeholders are urgently seeking clarity on from Defra /11
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed @JasonAldiss Couple of other takeaways

1. In this, as in so many sectors, its striking how little clarity industry has, and how hard it is to get firm predictions from govt or stakeholders about how it all goes down in Jan. Lots of unknowns. /12
@FT @MPGeorgeEustice @simondocvet @dominicgoudie @Foodanddrinkfed @JasonAldiss Asking around @MPGeorgeEustice gets a better write up than a lot of ministers on #Brexit...seems to understand/care about and listen to the industry.

Fingers crossed for January!! ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Foster

Peter Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pmdfoster

Jan 27
NEW: Gove’s top-down plan to build 150,000 houses in Cambridge by 2040 declared “nonsensical” by local council leaders because they don’t have water supply to build existing plan for 50,000 by that date! 🤯 But Gove keeps giving interviews promising it/1

ft.com/content/d1c0bf…
“The 150,000 homes would appear to just be nonsensical, if I’m honest, because the infrastructure just isn’t there,” Mike Davey, @mikelode1 Labour leader of Cambridge City Council /2
@mikelode1 “We are a pro-growth council, but we’ve run out of water. So that leaves us with a lot of questions about how this can be delivered. Gove has to solve the water problem and the energy problem or it can’t be done,” Bridget Smith, LD leader of South Cambridgeshire @cllrbridget /3
Read 8 tweets
Sep 19, 2023
David Frosts column on #Brexit this morning goes in three phases:

- gaslighting readers over his “thin” deal being actually fat 🙄

- some actual truth on UK as rule taker

- and then total failure to admit he’s responsible for this mess 🧵1/4

telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/1…
First the gaslighting: his deal is a ‘reverse’ trade deal…it erects barriers, it doesn’t remove them. It’s only “broadest deal ever” if UK started from zero relations, rather than working down from Single Market membership. As he well knows, but I wonder about the readers.😬 /2 Image
Second the one bit of truth. To get closer to EU and fix bits of his rubbish deal, the UK will become a big rule taker. That will be hard. What Frost omits to say is that’s a pure function of the hideous position his #Brexit deal has put the UK in. And no seat at the table. /3 Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
🚨🚨when ministers aren’t bashing UK universities they love to boast about them. Rightly. But unless something changes on funding there will be a lot less to boast about in 10 years time. /1

Here’s why via @ft Big Read…

on.ft.com/3rtAhGF
As Simon Marginson Higher Education prof at Oxford University explains the UK is in danger of getting back to the funding crisis levels that sparked need for tuition fees…/2 Image
These charts by @amy_borrett explain the basic problem. Triple whammy of inflation, #Brexit and risky over reliance on international students to x-subsidise undergrad teaching (previously used to make up research grant shortfalls). /3


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 29, 2023
Went to the Midlands to talk to UK manufacturers about slow #Brexit strangle. @MakeUK_ CEO Stephen Phipson summed up the challenge:

"The question we must ask is, ‘would Airbus make all their wings in the UK, if they were making that decision now’?” /1

https://t.co/YwerpUopHKft.com/content/2f99a9…


What he's getting at is that #Brexit is not, as is still widely supposed, a one-off event that companies adjust to.

It's a permanent friction that makes UK companies a risker bet for your supply chain than an EU company. And that matters for maufacturing/2
That's because 50 per cent of UK exports are from manufacturing, and of those that go to EU, around 50 per cent feed into EU supply chains -- so they make bits of things that criss-cross Europe to become whole things that then get exported to rest of world. /3
Read 12 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
This was interesting session. The 'chart wars' are a bit baffling if you're not an economist. I'm not. But I am a reporter. Gudgin argued #Brexit had no effect on the economy, but I don't know how that squares with all the conversations I've had with business in last 6 years/1
I get you can argue over the quantum of #brexit impact -- Springford model says -5.5% GDP, Portes reckons that fees too high, says thinks -2.5%...Jessop said -1%, but transitory...but "nothing" surely doesn't pass the sniff-test (to quote Gudgen on Springford's Doppelgangers /2
The empircal work by Jun Du at Warwick and Thomas Sampson at LSE on the numbers of traded lines/relationships, for example, can't amount to "nothing"; nor can UK parlous trade performance; even if non-differentiated impact on EU v RoW exports isn't yet explained/3
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
Graham Gudgin says that @JohnSpringford "doppelganger" method of analysing Brexit is a "statistical artefact" -- one that is used by Office of Budget Responsibility in their March 2023 forecast.

obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploa… == see p.47
Gudgin concludes that Brexit has had no real impact on UK economy. And talk about Brexit masks real reason for productivity crunch. OBR, Bank of England, CER etc and BBC/FT that report these studies are distracting.
Now @JohnSpringford responds to criticisms of his doppelganger method. Says that its misleading to compare individual countries. The Doppelganger composite smooths out differences, which is why it makes better counterfactual.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(