1/4 Trudeau annonce un autre don au reste du monde lors d’une vidéoconférence à l’ONU.
Nous sommes déjà en faillite alors qu’elle différence fait un autre 400M$? C’est seulement 1/1000e du gigantesque déficit de cette année. lapresse.ca/actualites/pol…
2/4 Et pour ceux qui ne croient pas que #COVID19 soit un prétexte pour instaurer plus de mondialisme et de communisme à l’échelle mondiale, voici les explications de Trudeau:
3/4 «Le Canada croit qu’une réponse forte et COORDONNÉE À TRAVERS LE MONDE et entre les secteurs est essentielle. Cette pandémie a fourni UNE OCCASION POUR UNE RÉINITIALISATION. C’est ...
4/4 ... notre chance d’accélérer nos efforts prépandémiques pour RÉINVENTER DES SYSTÈMES ÉCONOMIQUES qui répondent réellement aux défis mondiaux tels que l’extrême pauvreté, les inégalités et le changement climatique.»
All the establishment parties support mass immigration despite its catastrophic economic impact
“Canada is continuing to see meagre job growth. But any new jobs are immediately being overwhelmed by immigration numbers that remain at all-time highs.” nationalpost.com/opinion/first-…
2/6
The labour market is swamped with newcomers:
“in just the first eight months of 2023, Canada added 320,000 jobs, but also added 624,000 people looking for jobs.”
3/6
We’re getting poorer because of mass immigration:
“with Canada now absorbing more than one million new people each year, each Canadian’s individual share of the economic pie has continued to shrink.“
Opposition to mass immigration is becoming mainstream!
In 2019, when a PPC supporter paid for billboards across the country with “Say NO to mass immigration”, everybody freaked out. Moronic talking heads said we were racist, xenophobes, white supremacists.
But now, mainstream journalist @konradyakabuski uses many of the same arguments I have used all these years and that you will find in the PPC Immigration Policy in a long article in the mainstream @globeandmail, where he cites mainstream researchers, to explain the disastrous impact of Trudeau’s mass immigration policy.
And there is no negative reaction whatsoever. How come??
BECAUSE ANYONE WITH A BRAIN NOW HAS TO ADMIT I WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG!
The article is behind a paywall. For those who can’t read it, below are 12 excerpts with arguments you will recognize.
Soaring immigration levels under the Liberals have not made Canada richer, or its social programs more sustainable. If anything, the opposite is true.
It will take years to ramp up investments in housing, health care, public transportation and other infrastructure to accommodate the huge influx of newcomers the country has recently taken in.
2/
The country’s productivity deficit predates the recent population surge. But there is accumulating evidence that the latter is aggravating the former.
With a bigger pool of labour to draw on as a result of immigration, many businesses will be more likely to delay or forgo productivity-enhancing investments.
1/ This article gives a very revealing statistical portrait of the covid situation in Quebec.
These stats show that people under 60 in good health (with no preexisting condition) essentially had NO RISK of dying from covid — about 60 deaths out of 15k. journaldemontreal.com/2022/06/22/le-…
2/ The official number of covid deaths in Quebec, 15,462. is itself exaggerated, since it includes both those who died WITH covid and OF covid, the first group apparently being as numerous as the first.
3/ 69% of those who died were over 80 years old, which was more than their life expectancy at birth.
1/ Malgré le discours alarmiste des autorités et des médias, les personnes de moins de 60 ans en bonne santé (sans condition préexistante) n’ont essentiellement AUCUN RISQUE de mourir de la covid. journaldemontreal.com/2022/06/22/le-…
2/ Le nombre officiel de 15 462 décès est largement surestimé, principalement par l’inclusion des décès AVEC, et non À CAUSE de la covid, apparemment aussi nombreux.
3/ 69,2% des personnes décédées étaient âgées de plus de 80 ans, soit au-delà de leur espérance de vie à la naissance.
1/6 L’OMS s’apprête à adopter des amendements au Règlement sanitaire international de 2005 qui régit comment elle coordonne les politiques face aux menaces sanitaires mondiales. Elle a aussi lancé des négociations en vue de l’adoption d’un nouveau traité sur les pandémies…
2/6 …qui vise à lui donner plus d’autonomie et de pouvoir de prendre des décisions.
Contrairement à ce que plusieurs ont prétendu, je ne crois pas que cela donnera à l’OMS un contrôle sur notre système de santé.
3/6 L’OMS n’a ni force policière ni armée pour imposer ses décisions et recommandations, et nous pouvons lui dire d’aller se promener si nous le voulons.
1/4 The #WHO is set to adopt amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations governing how it coordinates policies to deal with global health threats, and has begun negotiations on a new Pandemic Treaty whose goal is to give it more autonomy and power to take decisions.
2/4 Contrary to what some have claimed, I don’t believe this gives the WHO control over our health care system.
The WHO has no police force or army to enforce its decisions and recommendations, and we can just tell them to take a hike if we want to.
3/4 What it does though is increase the influence and legitimacy of unelected global bureaucrats to dictate how we should run our affairs. It will elicit more pressure from other signatory countries to obey them, which a globalist government like Trudeau’s will gladly do.