Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 30, 2020 53 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Can UPSC prelims scheduled for October 4 be postponed due to #COVID19 ?

Supreme Court to shortly take up plea urging court to postpone #UPSCprelims. UPSC has informed court that exams cannot be deferred as it would affect next year's prelims too.

@advocate_alakh #SupremeCourt Image
Petitioners set to argue:

1. No Response given to the plight of the UPSC aspirants, who are working as Frontline CORONA WARRIORS, Doctors, Defense Personnel, Pregnant Ladies, Administrative Officers etc.

2. No Response given to the plight of the last attempt aspirants
3. No Response given to the point of – “Lack of Equal Level Playing Field”

4. Many states like – Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, AP, Rajasthan etc. have postponed their Public Service as well as Judicial Services Exams due to COVID-19 pandemic
Matter begins

Adv Alakh: We have sought deferment of the UPSC exams

Senior Adv VK Shukla: UPSC is bent upon holding the exam ignoring our concerns

SC: don't say bent upon. They are duty bound

@UpscIndia33 @CivilserviceInd
@GSUPSC @advocate_alakh
#PostponeUPSC_CSE
Justice Khanwilkar: be persuasive, not aggressive

Shukla: UPSC needs to be more human. Aspirants are working as frontline covid warriors. They had not prepared to participate in all these activities.

@UpscIndia33 @CivilserviceInd
@GSUPSC @advocate_alakh
#PostponeUPSC_CSE
SC: Its for 10 lakh people and its cannot be customized area or individual wise. We have seen the affidavit by UPSC. They have said all arrangements been made. They will take into account more arrangement. But should not be held for some students that is not logical
SC: This exam has a cascading effect on other exams. Please use the opportunity to make a suggestions to the UPSC.

SC: There are 72 centres and 2500 sub centres there. Distance will be between students

Shukla: students travel distances and that was the main concern
Shukla: front line COVID warriors etc are aspirants and are rendering services for these people. UPSC has not said a word about them

SC: Tell us the number of such candidates? Details?

Shukla: we don't have full details. But one of the petitioner is a covid warrior
SC: If there is 10 out of 10 lakhs then doctrine of proportionality has to be kept in mind. If its significant number we can ask authorities to consider them.

Shukla: NEET was in 150 centres but UPSC will be in 72 centers

SC: There are 2.6 k sub centers
Shukla: There are travel issues too

SC: Everything is getting unlocked and there are facilities now

Shukla: trains services have not fully resumed.

SC: If there is a complete lockdown or curfew situation then its a different issue but that's not the case in any city
Shukla: many students have been deprived of educational resources. Colleges and libraries are shut..

SC: finish transport point. Which are the cities which are completely in lockdowm or curfew?

Shukla: we don't have this at the moment
Shukla: many students have not been able to study. Libraries are closed which is a big help for students of every strata of the society. Full preparation cannot be compromised

SC: In that case performance will be uniform

Shukla: but aim is to get the best talent
SC: May be you are thinking about 1950s. Now all study material is available on the internet.

#SupremeCourt
#UPSC2020
Shukla: relaxation on number of attempts need to be given to the students who are appearing for the last attempt

SC: Affidavit says attendance for this exam has always been close to 50 percent. This is the diff between aspirants and the ones who actually take the exam
Shukla: atleast look into the issue of attempts and age relaxation.

SC: Yes this can be taken into account. This suggestion will be put to other side.
Shukla: the exams will now lead to denial of equal opportunity

SC: all candidates are facing uniform problems and are placed equally. Let us go to the next application
Adv Anushree: NTA had claimed that best interest of candidates is of paramount importance. Here candidates are from varied strata. In the present situation their movements are strictly restricted. Traibs in rural areas have not resumed
SC: UPSC has asked Chief Secretaries of all States to arrange transport . You are aspiring to become a public servant. You are not a student. Tell me how many public exams have been conducted in the recent past? Was it not acceptable to everyone?
Adv: But for them special SOPs were issued so that safety and hygiene is maintained. These students don't have means of transport

SC:That is your assumption. There have been exams where 2 lakh students appeared in one exam.

Adv:but students from below poverty line will appear
SC: That is the social fabric of the country! You don't know about arrangements made.

Adv Anushree: I have filed an application about students who have no means to travel. It is not listed
SC: every year there are some issues. Like environmental issues etc, and this is not a case of students appearing, these are to be public servants and they should act like that. Come out of your shell and comfort zone
Adv: Please consider then the request of relaxing the number of attention and age.. there are also many who can't get hotel accommodations. Some directions are needed so that hotel is given for students in basis of admit card as some states seek COVID report etc
Adv Anushree: If some other provision can be made for the COVID positive students where they can appear separately and write the exam.
Adv Sumanth Nookala for an intervenor: number of students in an exam centee should be in conformity with the MHA guideline

Adv Anushree: Please consider merging 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims
SC: Is UPSC aware of the grievances for the officers who are not being given leave for the exams from COVID duty, specially covid warriors? What arrangements are for them?

Adv Naresh Kaushik: I have not received any such representation. I will verify again.
Adv Kaushik for UPSC: It was first to be held on May 31...

SC: We have read..

Adv: so far as facilities are concerned, 2 phased options was given to change the centres to candidates
Adv Kaushik reads the letter of UPSC to cabinet secretary.

SC: Point us to the response where authorities agreed to your requests
Adv Kaushik: We have written to all the Chief Secretaries of states. We have requested that public transport level run at an optimum level during the exam and also till October 3. We have also given a complete list of centers
Adv Kaushik: We have asked the Chairman of the Railway board too to issue suitable directions. We have also stated that CSE prelims 2021 will be delayed too. Not even a single instance of grievance has been recieved by us.
Adv Kaushik: we have recieved no grievance saying any candidate is facing any handicap. In fact we have recieved requests to not postpone it further. I agree that internet is also there to aid and help. There are 6 chances to appear in this exam. Submissions are too generalised
SC: there is a suggestion that students be given hotels on basis of admit cards. Is it possible to do that ? Is it possible to have separate centres for COVID positive students?
Adv Kaushik: If we have any request we will make separate seating arrangement

SC: You will get overnight requests. You are not getting our point.
Kaushik: every centre has a separate arrangement for COVID positive people.

SC: but there are instructions that such patients cannot travel. It requires isolation how can lives be risked? We cannot breach protocol by saying quarantine has to be violated.
Adv Anushree: But a positive student was allowed to take CLAT

SC: that one instance cannot become the norm
SC: If a candidate is unable to appear. Then can he be given another option for appearance.

ASG SV Raju: There may be a later situation of Typhoid, fever etc. Today juts COVID. That is why six attempts have been given. Rules do not provide that.

SC: it has to be done one time
ASG Raju: It cannot be done.

SC: if the person is within age limit can a one time option be given to the candidate?

SC: You cannot compare typhoid etc with a pandemic!
SC: Merging exams are not possible. But does UPSC guidelines conform with MHA guidelines. If there is any lacuna please seek supplementary guidelines.

ASG: We will seek instructions on this
Adv Anushree: some directions must be given to check trains are available. It should be made public that trains have resumed.

SC: Please inform the railway authorities to do so. (To ASG Raju)
SC: relaxation of age should only be for the last attempts and not for others. This suggestion can be looked at.

Adv Anushree: especially for frontline workers.

SC: there is no case before us
Adv Anushree: my client is the father of a serving CAPF officer. He is running a quarantine centre. How can he be expected to leave duty and come?

SC: Show us the request for leave letter

Adv: its an unprecedented situation. My client is appearing for the last attempt
SC: He can appear in duty and the exam. We have not seen this before too

Adv: there are hundreds of frontline workers. UPSC wants the best talent, hence the submission. He has a 18 hour duty.
SC: how can you make allegations against railways and expect observations. This is the new culture of PIL. We can't decide on the basis unsubstantiated allegations. Here its not the case that Railways did not respond.
SC: Consodeting the fact that public exams have been conducted in the recent passed it is a testimony of fact that a SOP is followed by MHA to conduct such exams. Lack of transport facilities across all centres including 2,569 sub centres have not been substantiated
SC: UPSC also allowed candidates to change the centres. Next issue was about students who couldn't prepare during lockdown. But online resources were available
SC: Am extra attempt is sought for the ones who are taking the last attempt as they might not able to appear due to the pandemic. In this regard we have impressed upon ASG Raju to explore possibility for giving them one more attempt to such exams without extending age limit.
SC: ASG has stated it will be concerned and a formal decision will be taken expeditiously.
Different states have different SOP including not permitting admission of persons coming from.other states.
SC: In this regard, UPSC may issue directions to states to see that candidates with admit cards will be admitted in local hotels near sub centres/centres
SC: Regarding appearance of COVID patients being allowed to appear in exam with separate arrangement. It is not possible to entertain such general prayers. SOP requires that COVID positive ones are to be in isolation and quarantine.
SC: allowing COVID positive people inside cenres will expose other candidates which is avoidable. We need not direct on this aspect any further
SC: UPSC should ensure separate sitting arrangements for candidates who are suffering from cough and cold during the test.
SC: UPSC has to ensure conformity of their guidelines with that of MHA especially to see more than 100 candidates are not allowed in one centre. The SOP issued by UPSC if found not in conformity, then supplementary SOP to be issued.
SC: It was suggested that merging of 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims be done. We are not impressed by this. Resorting to this will lead to cascading effect on other exams as stated in Affidavit. UPSC should make available all facilities and follow all protocol.

#SupremeCourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Nov 13
Whether chargesheet filed without Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report in case under NDPS Act, 1985 can be termed as 'incomplete report' under CrPC? #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the matter

#NDPSAct Image
Read our report on additional questions that the Court agreed to consider: barandbench.com/news/ndps-act-…
A three-judge Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ujjal Bhuyan will also examine various related aspects that concern the fairness and efficacy of the trials under the NDPS Act Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 13
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against 2023 Delhi HC decision ruling that application for drawing sample of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance before Magistrate u/s 52A of NDPS Act should be made within 72 hours @narcoticsbureau Image
In May 2023, the High Court had observed that such an application cannot be moved at the “whims and fancies” of Narcotics Control Bureau, being the prosecuting agency.
When matter came before Supreme Court earlier, the Court had orally remarked that Section 52A is enabling not mandatory.
Read 33 tweets
Nov 13
#BULLDOZERJUSTICE ?

Supreme Court to shortly deliver judgment laying down pan-India guidelines on use of bulldozer by state governments as a punitive measure to demolish house or shop of a person immediately after he or she is named as accused of an offence

#SupremeCourt Image
Judgement to be delivered by a bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Vishwanathan
#SupremeCourt #bulldozer Image
Pronouncement of judgment at 10:30 am

Track thread for all updates

#SupremeCourt
Read 13 tweets
Nov 8
Supreme Court Bar Association holds farewell for CJI DY Chandrachud #SupremeCourtofIndia Image
Sr Adv Rachana Srivastava, VP SCBA: CJI Chandrachud was a part of 23 constitution benches. Your journey in the legal world has pushed boundaries. You leave behind a court which has hope for all of us. You had unwavering dedication to the rule of law.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal, President SCBA: when you have to journey the judge of any judge what is the benchmark. We can criticise a judge all we want. You have to judge the man in the backdrop of the times we live in. When we discuss him, his manner, his affability which is of one of the greatest judges of this country.Image
Read 29 tweets
Nov 8
Ceremonial bench on the last working day of CJI DY Chandrachud

CJI Chandrachud along with CJI Designate Sanjiv Khanna, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra

#SupremeCourt Image
Attorney General R Venkataramani: Recently in Brazil after the conference ended everyone started dancing. what if I ask everyone here to dance on your retirement and I am sure most will vote in favour of me.
SG Tushar Mehta: Complete impartiality in dispensation of justice. We were never hesitant in good or bad matters before you. For govt we won few we lost many but we knew that we did not get an opportunity to convince the court and put our point forward. My lord has always taken a stand as the karta of the family
DYC will really be missed.
Read 21 tweets
Nov 6
#BREAKING Supreme Court to State of UP: How can you just enter someone's home and demolish it without following course of law or serving notice?

CJI DY Chandrachud: We are not inclined to accept the request of the State of UP to adjourn the proceedings since pleadings are completed and the court is required to evaluate the materials placed before to decide legality of action.

#SupremeCourtofIndia @myogiofficeImage
CJI: The following position emerges from narration of facts: state of UP has not produced original width of state highway notified as national highway, no material was placed to show whether any inquiry was conducted to figure out encroachers, there is no material produced to indicate that land was acquired before demolition was carried out. The state has failed to disclose the precise extent of encroachments, the width of the existing road, the width of notified highway, extent of property of petitioner which feel within central line of highway and why the demolition was needed beyond the area of alleged encroachment. NHRC report shows demolition was far in excess than the area of alleged encroachment. #SupremeCourtofIndia
#BREAKING

CJI: The demolition was carried out without any notice or disclosure to the occupiers of the basis of the demarcation or the extent of demolition to be carried out. It is clear demolition was high handed and without the authority of law. The petitioner states the demolition was only because the petitioner had flagged irregularities in road construction in newspaper report. Such action by the state cannot be countenanced and when dealing with private property law has to be followed.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(