Can UPSC prelims scheduled for October 4 be postponed due to #COVID19 ?
Supreme Court to shortly take up plea urging court to postpone #UPSCprelims. UPSC has informed court that exams cannot be deferred as it would affect next year's prelims too.
1. No Response given to the plight of the UPSC aspirants, who are working as Frontline CORONA WARRIORS, Doctors, Defense Personnel, Pregnant Ladies, Administrative Officers etc.
2. No Response given to the plight of the last attempt aspirants
3. No Response given to the point of – “Lack of Equal Level Playing Field”
4. Many states like – Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, AP, Rajasthan etc. have postponed their Public Service as well as Judicial Services Exams due to COVID-19 pandemic
SC: Its for 10 lakh people and its cannot be customized area or individual wise. We have seen the affidavit by UPSC. They have said all arrangements been made. They will take into account more arrangement. But should not be held for some students that is not logical
SC: This exam has a cascading effect on other exams. Please use the opportunity to make a suggestions to the UPSC.
SC: There are 72 centres and 2500 sub centres there. Distance will be between students
Shukla: students travel distances and that was the main concern
Shukla: front line COVID warriors etc are aspirants and are rendering services for these people. UPSC has not said a word about them
SC: Tell us the number of such candidates? Details?
Shukla: we don't have full details. But one of the petitioner is a covid warrior
SC: If there is 10 out of 10 lakhs then doctrine of proportionality has to be kept in mind. If its significant number we can ask authorities to consider them.
Shukla: NEET was in 150 centres but UPSC will be in 72 centers
SC: There are 2.6 k sub centers
Shukla: There are travel issues too
SC: Everything is getting unlocked and there are facilities now
Shukla: trains services have not fully resumed.
SC: If there is a complete lockdown or curfew situation then its a different issue but that's not the case in any city
Shukla: many students have been deprived of educational resources. Colleges and libraries are shut..
SC: finish transport point. Which are the cities which are completely in lockdowm or curfew?
Shukla: we don't have this at the moment
Shukla: many students have not been able to study. Libraries are closed which is a big help for students of every strata of the society. Full preparation cannot be compromised
SC: In that case performance will be uniform
Shukla: but aim is to get the best talent
SC: May be you are thinking about 1950s. Now all study material is available on the internet.
Shukla: relaxation on number of attempts need to be given to the students who are appearing for the last attempt
SC: Affidavit says attendance for this exam has always been close to 50 percent. This is the diff between aspirants and the ones who actually take the exam
Shukla: atleast look into the issue of attempts and age relaxation.
SC: Yes this can be taken into account. This suggestion will be put to other side.
Shukla: the exams will now lead to denial of equal opportunity
SC: all candidates are facing uniform problems and are placed equally. Let us go to the next application
Adv Anushree: NTA had claimed that best interest of candidates is of paramount importance. Here candidates are from varied strata. In the present situation their movements are strictly restricted. Traibs in rural areas have not resumed
SC: UPSC has asked Chief Secretaries of all States to arrange transport . You are aspiring to become a public servant. You are not a student. Tell me how many public exams have been conducted in the recent past? Was it not acceptable to everyone?
Adv: But for them special SOPs were issued so that safety and hygiene is maintained. These students don't have means of transport
SC:That is your assumption. There have been exams where 2 lakh students appeared in one exam.
Adv:but students from below poverty line will appear
SC: That is the social fabric of the country! You don't know about arrangements made.
Adv Anushree: I have filed an application about students who have no means to travel. It is not listed
SC: every year there are some issues. Like environmental issues etc, and this is not a case of students appearing, these are to be public servants and they should act like that. Come out of your shell and comfort zone
Adv: Please consider then the request of relaxing the number of attention and age.. there are also many who can't get hotel accommodations. Some directions are needed so that hotel is given for students in basis of admit card as some states seek COVID report etc
Adv Anushree: If some other provision can be made for the COVID positive students where they can appear separately and write the exam.
Adv Sumanth Nookala for an intervenor: number of students in an exam centee should be in conformity with the MHA guideline
Adv Anushree: Please consider merging 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims
SC: Is UPSC aware of the grievances for the officers who are not being given leave for the exams from COVID duty, specially covid warriors? What arrangements are for them?
Adv Naresh Kaushik: I have not received any such representation. I will verify again.
Adv Kaushik for UPSC: It was first to be held on May 31...
SC: We have read..
Adv: so far as facilities are concerned, 2 phased options was given to change the centres to candidates
Adv Kaushik reads the letter of UPSC to cabinet secretary.
SC: Point us to the response where authorities agreed to your requests
Adv Kaushik: We have written to all the Chief Secretaries of states. We have requested that public transport level run at an optimum level during the exam and also till October 3. We have also given a complete list of centers
Adv Kaushik: We have asked the Chairman of the Railway board too to issue suitable directions. We have also stated that CSE prelims 2021 will be delayed too. Not even a single instance of grievance has been recieved by us.
Adv Kaushik: we have recieved no grievance saying any candidate is facing any handicap. In fact we have recieved requests to not postpone it further. I agree that internet is also there to aid and help. There are 6 chances to appear in this exam. Submissions are too generalised
SC: there is a suggestion that students be given hotels on basis of admit cards. Is it possible to do that ? Is it possible to have separate centres for COVID positive students?
Adv Kaushik: If we have any request we will make separate seating arrangement
SC: You will get overnight requests. You are not getting our point.
Kaushik: every centre has a separate arrangement for COVID positive people.
SC: but there are instructions that such patients cannot travel. It requires isolation how can lives be risked? We cannot breach protocol by saying quarantine has to be violated.
Adv Anushree: But a positive student was allowed to take CLAT
SC: that one instance cannot become the norm
SC: If a candidate is unable to appear. Then can he be given another option for appearance.
ASG SV Raju: There may be a later situation of Typhoid, fever etc. Today juts COVID. That is why six attempts have been given. Rules do not provide that.
SC: it has to be done one time
ASG Raju: It cannot be done.
SC: if the person is within age limit can a one time option be given to the candidate?
SC: You cannot compare typhoid etc with a pandemic!
SC: Merging exams are not possible. But does UPSC guidelines conform with MHA guidelines. If there is any lacuna please seek supplementary guidelines.
ASG: We will seek instructions on this
Adv Anushree: some directions must be given to check trains are available. It should be made public that trains have resumed.
SC: Please inform the railway authorities to do so. (To ASG Raju)
SC: relaxation of age should only be for the last attempts and not for others. This suggestion can be looked at.
Adv Anushree: especially for frontline workers.
SC: there is no case before us
Adv Anushree: my client is the father of a serving CAPF officer. He is running a quarantine centre. How can he be expected to leave duty and come?
SC: Show us the request for leave letter
Adv: its an unprecedented situation. My client is appearing for the last attempt
SC: He can appear in duty and the exam. We have not seen this before too
Adv: there are hundreds of frontline workers. UPSC wants the best talent, hence the submission. He has a 18 hour duty.
SC: how can you make allegations against railways and expect observations. This is the new culture of PIL. We can't decide on the basis unsubstantiated allegations. Here its not the case that Railways did not respond.
SC: Consodeting the fact that public exams have been conducted in the recent passed it is a testimony of fact that a SOP is followed by MHA to conduct such exams. Lack of transport facilities across all centres including 2,569 sub centres have not been substantiated
SC: UPSC also allowed candidates to change the centres. Next issue was about students who couldn't prepare during lockdown. But online resources were available
SC: Am extra attempt is sought for the ones who are taking the last attempt as they might not able to appear due to the pandemic. In this regard we have impressed upon ASG Raju to explore possibility for giving them one more attempt to such exams without extending age limit.
SC: ASG has stated it will be concerned and a formal decision will be taken expeditiously.
Different states have different SOP including not permitting admission of persons coming from.other states.
SC: In this regard, UPSC may issue directions to states to see that candidates with admit cards will be admitted in local hotels near sub centres/centres
SC: Regarding appearance of COVID patients being allowed to appear in exam with separate arrangement. It is not possible to entertain such general prayers. SOP requires that COVID positive ones are to be in isolation and quarantine.
SC: allowing COVID positive people inside cenres will expose other candidates which is avoidable. We need not direct on this aspect any further
SC: UPSC should ensure separate sitting arrangements for candidates who are suffering from cough and cold during the test.
SC: UPSC has to ensure conformity of their guidelines with that of MHA especially to see more than 100 candidates are not allowed in one centre. The SOP issued by UPSC if found not in conformity, then supplementary SOP to be issued.
SC: It was suggested that merging of 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims be done. We are not impressed by this. Resorting to this will lead to cascading effect on other exams as stated in Affidavit. UPSC should make available all facilities and follow all protocol.
Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's order which set aside the appointments in over 24,000 teaching and non-teaching posts in government schools #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial
Sr Adv Vibha Datta Makhija: we would need two days.
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: Yes let us start. No piecemeal arguments.
State: Let the state start.
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi begins for state of West Bengal
Supreme Court hears appeal challenging the Madras High Court's decision to allow Carnatic vocalist TM Krishna to receive the Sangita Kalanidhi MS Subbulakshmi Award.
ASG Venkataraman: Award was
conferred and it was greatly publicised. He is a person who made misogynistic comment against her
#SupremeCourt
ASG: the single judge order is in effect. The music academy could not have given the award yersterday. Can an injunction be breached and a public act be committee? Court is not powerless.
ASG: the court can stay this award or till suit is pending the fourth respondent cannot use the name of the award at all
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: Fourth respondent is not represented here as of now.
- Allu Arjun is being represented by G Ashok Reddy
- Justice Juvvadi Sridevi to hear the matter
Justice Sridevi to hear the matter at 4 PM
#AlluArjun #ALLUARJUNARRESTED
Actor Allu Arjun was arrested after he visited Sandhya Theatre on December 4, 2024 to watch #Pushpa2. His security staff pushed general public and commotion caused a death of 39 year old. Her husband filed an FIR holding #AlluArjun & Management responsible for her death.
Bhushan Steel insolvency case: #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the case
Earlier Enforcement Directorate (ED) has stated that its appeal against JSW Steel's takeover of Bhushan Power and Steel might not be required to be argued in view of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Adv Zoheb Hossain: if the relief can be moulded then the plea can be disposed off.
Justice Bela Trivedi: are you appearing on behalf of SG Mehta?
Hossain: Attachment by ED has been made after the approval of plan by NCLT.. thus prayer can be considered. If it is restored then let the attachment be restored to resolution professional under 8(8).
Justice Trivedi: We will not pass any piecemeal orders.
Tempers flare in #SupremeCourt amid hearing in case concerning adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal; Court urges lawyers to maintain discipline.
Court: If all of you behave like this ... Don’t you know this being livestreamed? Don’t you know these things are going in public domain?
Court: Don’t you think that this kind of behaviour inside the courtroom – what kind of impression is being given to the public? What kind of message is being given, you are officers of the Court all of you!
#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange
Court: Lot of training is required to be given to the bar also. We are sorry with the way you are going ahead ... You don't have any decorum to maintain in court?
#BREAKING: Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging constitutional validity of provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986
Bench: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan
#UPGangstersAct
Senior Adv R Basant (appears for Petitioner): Whether only on basis of one base case another case under the act can be registered by the police itself. Furthermore, police is complainant, prosecutor and adjudicator under provisions of the act. Please note. This is important
Sr Adv Basant: Also, under this Act, without even a case of FIR against a person, its entire property are allowed to be attached. This aspect came up in Dharmendra Kirthal (2013) 8 SCC 368 as well and the court had issued notice but later did not consider the issue.