Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 30, 2020 53 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Can UPSC prelims scheduled for October 4 be postponed due to #COVID19 ?

Supreme Court to shortly take up plea urging court to postpone #UPSCprelims. UPSC has informed court that exams cannot be deferred as it would affect next year's prelims too.

@advocate_alakh #SupremeCourt Image
Petitioners set to argue:

1. No Response given to the plight of the UPSC aspirants, who are working as Frontline CORONA WARRIORS, Doctors, Defense Personnel, Pregnant Ladies, Administrative Officers etc.

2. No Response given to the plight of the last attempt aspirants
3. No Response given to the point of – “Lack of Equal Level Playing Field”

4. Many states like – Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, AP, Rajasthan etc. have postponed their Public Service as well as Judicial Services Exams due to COVID-19 pandemic
Matter begins

Adv Alakh: We have sought deferment of the UPSC exams

Senior Adv VK Shukla: UPSC is bent upon holding the exam ignoring our concerns

SC: don't say bent upon. They are duty bound

@UpscIndia33 @CivilserviceInd
@GSUPSC @advocate_alakh
#PostponeUPSC_CSE
Justice Khanwilkar: be persuasive, not aggressive

Shukla: UPSC needs to be more human. Aspirants are working as frontline covid warriors. They had not prepared to participate in all these activities.

@UpscIndia33 @CivilserviceInd
@GSUPSC @advocate_alakh
#PostponeUPSC_CSE
SC: Its for 10 lakh people and its cannot be customized area or individual wise. We have seen the affidavit by UPSC. They have said all arrangements been made. They will take into account more arrangement. But should not be held for some students that is not logical
SC: This exam has a cascading effect on other exams. Please use the opportunity to make a suggestions to the UPSC.

SC: There are 72 centres and 2500 sub centres there. Distance will be between students

Shukla: students travel distances and that was the main concern
Shukla: front line COVID warriors etc are aspirants and are rendering services for these people. UPSC has not said a word about them

SC: Tell us the number of such candidates? Details?

Shukla: we don't have full details. But one of the petitioner is a covid warrior
SC: If there is 10 out of 10 lakhs then doctrine of proportionality has to be kept in mind. If its significant number we can ask authorities to consider them.

Shukla: NEET was in 150 centres but UPSC will be in 72 centers

SC: There are 2.6 k sub centers
Shukla: There are travel issues too

SC: Everything is getting unlocked and there are facilities now

Shukla: trains services have not fully resumed.

SC: If there is a complete lockdown or curfew situation then its a different issue but that's not the case in any city
Shukla: many students have been deprived of educational resources. Colleges and libraries are shut..

SC: finish transport point. Which are the cities which are completely in lockdowm or curfew?

Shukla: we don't have this at the moment
Shukla: many students have not been able to study. Libraries are closed which is a big help for students of every strata of the society. Full preparation cannot be compromised

SC: In that case performance will be uniform

Shukla: but aim is to get the best talent
SC: May be you are thinking about 1950s. Now all study material is available on the internet.

#SupremeCourt
#UPSC2020
Shukla: relaxation on number of attempts need to be given to the students who are appearing for the last attempt

SC: Affidavit says attendance for this exam has always been close to 50 percent. This is the diff between aspirants and the ones who actually take the exam
Shukla: atleast look into the issue of attempts and age relaxation.

SC: Yes this can be taken into account. This suggestion will be put to other side.
Shukla: the exams will now lead to denial of equal opportunity

SC: all candidates are facing uniform problems and are placed equally. Let us go to the next application
Adv Anushree: NTA had claimed that best interest of candidates is of paramount importance. Here candidates are from varied strata. In the present situation their movements are strictly restricted. Traibs in rural areas have not resumed
SC: UPSC has asked Chief Secretaries of all States to arrange transport . You are aspiring to become a public servant. You are not a student. Tell me how many public exams have been conducted in the recent past? Was it not acceptable to everyone?
Adv: But for them special SOPs were issued so that safety and hygiene is maintained. These students don't have means of transport

SC:That is your assumption. There have been exams where 2 lakh students appeared in one exam.

Adv:but students from below poverty line will appear
SC: That is the social fabric of the country! You don't know about arrangements made.

Adv Anushree: I have filed an application about students who have no means to travel. It is not listed
SC: every year there are some issues. Like environmental issues etc, and this is not a case of students appearing, these are to be public servants and they should act like that. Come out of your shell and comfort zone
Adv: Please consider then the request of relaxing the number of attention and age.. there are also many who can't get hotel accommodations. Some directions are needed so that hotel is given for students in basis of admit card as some states seek COVID report etc
Adv Anushree: If some other provision can be made for the COVID positive students where they can appear separately and write the exam.
Adv Sumanth Nookala for an intervenor: number of students in an exam centee should be in conformity with the MHA guideline

Adv Anushree: Please consider merging 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims
SC: Is UPSC aware of the grievances for the officers who are not being given leave for the exams from COVID duty, specially covid warriors? What arrangements are for them?

Adv Naresh Kaushik: I have not received any such representation. I will verify again.
Adv Kaushik for UPSC: It was first to be held on May 31...

SC: We have read..

Adv: so far as facilities are concerned, 2 phased options was given to change the centres to candidates
Adv Kaushik reads the letter of UPSC to cabinet secretary.

SC: Point us to the response where authorities agreed to your requests
Adv Kaushik: We have written to all the Chief Secretaries of states. We have requested that public transport level run at an optimum level during the exam and also till October 3. We have also given a complete list of centers
Adv Kaushik: We have asked the Chairman of the Railway board too to issue suitable directions. We have also stated that CSE prelims 2021 will be delayed too. Not even a single instance of grievance has been recieved by us.
Adv Kaushik: we have recieved no grievance saying any candidate is facing any handicap. In fact we have recieved requests to not postpone it further. I agree that internet is also there to aid and help. There are 6 chances to appear in this exam. Submissions are too generalised
SC: there is a suggestion that students be given hotels on basis of admit cards. Is it possible to do that ? Is it possible to have separate centres for COVID positive students?
Adv Kaushik: If we have any request we will make separate seating arrangement

SC: You will get overnight requests. You are not getting our point.
Kaushik: every centre has a separate arrangement for COVID positive people.

SC: but there are instructions that such patients cannot travel. It requires isolation how can lives be risked? We cannot breach protocol by saying quarantine has to be violated.
Adv Anushree: But a positive student was allowed to take CLAT

SC: that one instance cannot become the norm
SC: If a candidate is unable to appear. Then can he be given another option for appearance.

ASG SV Raju: There may be a later situation of Typhoid, fever etc. Today juts COVID. That is why six attempts have been given. Rules do not provide that.

SC: it has to be done one time
ASG Raju: It cannot be done.

SC: if the person is within age limit can a one time option be given to the candidate?

SC: You cannot compare typhoid etc with a pandemic!
SC: Merging exams are not possible. But does UPSC guidelines conform with MHA guidelines. If there is any lacuna please seek supplementary guidelines.

ASG: We will seek instructions on this
Adv Anushree: some directions must be given to check trains are available. It should be made public that trains have resumed.

SC: Please inform the railway authorities to do so. (To ASG Raju)
SC: relaxation of age should only be for the last attempts and not for others. This suggestion can be looked at.

Adv Anushree: especially for frontline workers.

SC: there is no case before us
Adv Anushree: my client is the father of a serving CAPF officer. He is running a quarantine centre. How can he be expected to leave duty and come?

SC: Show us the request for leave letter

Adv: its an unprecedented situation. My client is appearing for the last attempt
SC: He can appear in duty and the exam. We have not seen this before too

Adv: there are hundreds of frontline workers. UPSC wants the best talent, hence the submission. He has a 18 hour duty.
SC: how can you make allegations against railways and expect observations. This is the new culture of PIL. We can't decide on the basis unsubstantiated allegations. Here its not the case that Railways did not respond.
SC: Consodeting the fact that public exams have been conducted in the recent passed it is a testimony of fact that a SOP is followed by MHA to conduct such exams. Lack of transport facilities across all centres including 2,569 sub centres have not been substantiated
SC: UPSC also allowed candidates to change the centres. Next issue was about students who couldn't prepare during lockdown. But online resources were available
SC: Am extra attempt is sought for the ones who are taking the last attempt as they might not able to appear due to the pandemic. In this regard we have impressed upon ASG Raju to explore possibility for giving them one more attempt to such exams without extending age limit.
SC: ASG has stated it will be concerned and a formal decision will be taken expeditiously.
Different states have different SOP including not permitting admission of persons coming from.other states.
SC: In this regard, UPSC may issue directions to states to see that candidates with admit cards will be admitted in local hotels near sub centres/centres
SC: Regarding appearance of COVID patients being allowed to appear in exam with separate arrangement. It is not possible to entertain such general prayers. SOP requires that COVID positive ones are to be in isolation and quarantine.
SC: allowing COVID positive people inside cenres will expose other candidates which is avoidable. We need not direct on this aspect any further
SC: UPSC should ensure separate sitting arrangements for candidates who are suffering from cough and cold during the test.
SC: UPSC has to ensure conformity of their guidelines with that of MHA especially to see more than 100 candidates are not allowed in one centre. The SOP issued by UPSC if found not in conformity, then supplementary SOP to be issued.
SC: It was suggested that merging of 2020 prelims and 2021 prelims be done. We are not impressed by this. Resorting to this will lead to cascading effect on other exams as stated in Affidavit. UPSC should make available all facilities and follow all protocol.

#SupremeCourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Apr 8
Supreme Court to deliver judgment on petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government against Governor RN Ravi's refusal to grant assent to several bills passed by the State Legislative Assembly, including those concerning the appointment of Vice Chancellors to State Universities #SupremeCourtImage
The State had moved the Court seeking directions to the Governor/ President to decide or give assent to bills passed by the State legislature in a time-bound manner.

The State government has argued that the Governor, by indefinitely withholding assent on these bills, was holding the entire State to ransom. In such a situation, the Court must intervene, the Tamil Nadu government argued.Image
Bench assembles

Justice Pardiwala: We are ordering de tagging of one writ. 1271/2023 will be heard separately
Read 24 tweets
Apr 1
Supreme Court hears the case where it took objection to the absence of an advocate-on-record (AoR) in court during the hearing of a case filed through him

Justice Bela Trivedi: You could not have filed the SLP. If you don't get it you should not be a AoR. I will not leave the case just like that. You took undue advantage of some thing

AoR: I take responsibility

SC: you have no option but to take this. Apology will not doImage
Justice Trivedi: judgment had come and you are challenging it. Should you not read the papers. Where is the scope for any explanation.

AoR: my learned friend

SC: don't say learned fried. We are agitated and pained. Day in and day out we are seeing this. It is you and only you. For surrendering you say condone delay. Then in condonation application.. what kind of language is being used
AoR: the plea has been drawn by someone else

Justice Trivedi: So what ?????? It bears your signature or not

AoR: it does.
Read 20 tweets
Mar 23
Scenes from the Delhi High Court after the declaration of Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) election results. Senior Advocate N Hariharan has been elected as the President of DHCBA.
Senior Advocate N Hariharan secured 2,967 votes and won by a margin of 87 votes. Senior Advocate Kirti Uppal came second with 2,880 votes.

The other two candidates - Senior Advocate Abhijat garnered 1,429 votes and Senior Advocate Vivek Sood garnered 339 votes.
Senior Advocate N Hariharan after winning the elections. Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 19
#Breaking Bombay High Court has overturned a Family Court decision that denied the request to waive the statutory cooling-off period for the divorce of cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal and Dhanashree Verma under the Hindu Marriage Act.
#BombayHC #YuzvendraChahal Image
A bench of Justice Madhav Jamdar has also directed the family court to decide the divorce petition by tomorrow considering Chahal's participation in the upcoming IPL
The couple that got married in December 2020 was living apart since June 2022.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 3
[Can visually impaired become judges ? ]

#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgment on this significant issue

The court to hand down verdict in the suo motu case concerning visually impaired in judicial services Image
The genesis of the case lies in the rules governing judicial appointments in Madhya Pradesh which contained discriminatory language that prevented blind individuals from becoming judges.

This exclusion was challenged after a mother, whose visually impaired child aspired to the judiciary, wrote to the court, leading to a court-initiated public interest litigation.
Justice R Mahadevan: we have treated it as the most important case. We have touched upon constitutional framework also and institutional disability jurisprudence...
Read 6 tweets
Mar 3
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by Ranveer Allahabadia and Ashish Chanchlani in the case over remarks made in #indiasgotlatent show

Allahabadia and Chanchlani were protected from arrest in the last hearing
@BeerBicepsGuy Image
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud: We have moved an application. We are seeking lifting of one part of the order which refrained him from airing his shows etc. He has no sense of humour at all.. but he has 280 employees and it is his livelihood. It can be ordered that let no profane words be uttered.
SG: this is an isolated case. It is not vulgar but it is perverse. I saw the show also out of curiosity.. humour is one thing, vulgarity is one thing, and perversity is another level. Leave alone man and woman.. me and AG cannot see it together. The judges cannot see it together. Let him stay quiet for sometime .. Assam called him. He did not come.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(