The Hebrew prophets would not see the neutrality of church leaders as a virtue while people are victimised.
They would name it as an idolatrous vice.
The Hebrew prophets would see impartiality in the context of injustice as a travesty. They would ache with those on the receiving end of oppression. They would cry out with the poor.
The Hebrew prophets so radically identify with the hurting that they can’t keep silent while people suffer. Their concern is not for civility but the dignity of those whom the Powers prey upon.
Can you imagine Jeremiah extinguishing the fire in his bones to get an invitation to a prayer breakfast? Amos not speaking out to get photo ops with the powerful? Hosea seeking less offensive metaphors to share meals with rulers? Isaiah toning it down to “not lose people”?
The prophet is forever living in the awareness that it is not only the powerful, not only the Presidents, not only the Mining Executives, not only the corporate CEOs, not only the Senior Pastors, but *EVERYONE* who is in the image of God.
& that’s why it’s a pity that the tweet calling Trump a bully was deleted cos we desperately need prophetic courage to name Trump as a white supremacist who hates the poor and is criminally incompetent during a pandemic and climate catastrophe that literally threatens the planet.
The prophets were so partisan that they unquestionably & consistently sided with the underdog, the marginalised, the demonised, disadvantaged & scapegoated. They were in no Party’s pocket and not beholden to anyone in power cos they were held in the bosom of the God of the poor.
Solidarity with the prophets, who piercing poetry is always found in radical solidarity with the poor, will save us from “neutrality”.
Solidarity with the poor will also save us from being successful chaplains to the “military industrial entertainment incarceration complex.”
As Heschel’s reminds us, “The thought of God [of the Hebrew prophets] and indifference to other people’s suffering are mutually exclusive.”
If we can hold “god” and indifference to the suffering together, the prophets will insist we are worshipping in an idol.
To call that which enables lives of indifference to injustice “God” is to engage in an insidious blasphemy against the God of the Hebrew prophets.
We need to name clearly that much of Christendom’s presumption of coercive power and it’s corresponding “persecution complex” when it’s threatened with democracy is a blasphemous rejection of a the God of the prophets, and the Way of the nonviolent Messiah from Nazareth.
A few thoughts on what the “@Hillsong#Debates2020” deleted tweet actually reveals (it’s not what you think)
Why do so many Western Christians continue to unquestioningly back the Israeli government (even cheering on war! 🤮) despite the example & teachings of Jesus?
If you are a Christian, or you know Christians, please consider sharing this thread 🧵:
1. Wrongly assuming that “Israel” in the Scriptures is synonymous with the modern nation state that took the same name in 1948.
(Hat tip to @CandiceBenbow who I saw make the same point on Instagram)
This statement & podcast from Greg Boyd a master class in how *not* to respond to an investigation. It’s disturbing, inappropriate, unhelpful and exposes serious theological failures that obstruct pursing the truth, repentance and healing justice.
[thread] podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/thi…
While Greg Boyd’s heart is undoubtedly processing his own grief and showing grace it runs the risk of seeming like a PR framing of details from one party without the narrative of the other that bypasses current the investigation.
It also holds out the false hope of restoration when the investigation is still being carried out. Even if falsely accused, everyone involved should welcome a just and transparent processes that protect and preserve the dignity of all parties in pursing the truth.
People know that George Orwell literally fought against fascism, right?
Like travelled to Spain to volunteer fighting under the red and black flags of the anarcho-socialists, right?
That his “Animal Farm” is a socialist critique of authoritarian Communism, right?
Next time a Trump supporter wants to use Orwell maybe just read some Orwell expressing his own political journey to them...
“First I spent five years in an unsuitable profession (the Indian Imperial Police, in Burma)...
... and then I underwent poverty and the sense of failure. This increased my natural hatred of authority and made me for the first time fully aware of the existence of the working classes, and the job in Burma had given me some understanding of the nature of imperialism: ...
A study by former Stanford professor now Sydney University's US Studies Centre chief executive @SimonJackman (& team) found,
🦘Aussie conservative voters are ideologically closer to Hillary Clinton voters than Trump voters.
(Yep. Aussie *conservatives*) 🐨
American’s are often confused by Australia’s centre right party being a coalition of the Nationals and the Liberals. But as Liberal party founder PM Robert Menzies put it,
At the crux of so much anti ‘anti-Constantinian-Christian-Imperialism’ (including white supremacist manifestations) is the idea that Christians should play chaplain to the Powers that crucify the poor rather that be found with the Nazarene among those threatened with crucifixion.
Being Beloved Community is political responsibility.
Confession is political responsibility.
Repentance is political responsibility.
Reparations is political responsibility.
The economics of the Lord’s Table is political responsibility.
NVDA is political responsibility.
The church’s responsibility is not to govern history.
The church’s responsibility is to be a witness to the justice-bringing, enemy-loving, wealth-redistributing, violence-renouncing, oppression-ending, scapegoat-ceasing, outcast-including, creation-healing reign of God.