Thread by @DefenseAssange

Day 18: Julian Assange's resumed extradition hearing. Expecting final witness statements today. #AssangeCase

Defense is explaining to the judge that the parties need a little more time to agree to 2 witnesses' statements, then give an update on the Spanish case (Embassy spying), then make a final submission on the additions to the latest indictment.

We'll break for an hour and a half and the parties will give an update on progress on these matters.

Back from recess to say the parties are making progress but are still working, we'll be back at 2pm London time and will finish testimony phase today. #AssangeCase

Back from recess. Defense says we just need 1/2 hour more. Prosecution complains 2 new statements have just come in, objects to even considering them.

Defense lawyer Mark Summers: "upon mature reflection" I don't expect these will be objectionable, these have been mentioned/discussed before

Another recess, 40 minutes. #AssangeCase

Back again. Defense can now read a witness statement from Professor Michael Tigar

Tigar gives an overview of whistleblowing and journalism preventing injustice, "essential to achieving important social reforms", gives examples including Woodward & Bernstein reporting on the Nixon admin, Seymour Hersh

Tigar notes that the prosecution's opening included the word "journalistic" whereas the indictment calls WikiLeaks an "intelligence service for the people" and doesn't use the term "journalism"

Tigar talks about how common/routine it is for journalists to work with sources, soliciting information

Tigar talks about the importance of journalism in documenting war crimes. Then discusses overclassification — US law doesn’t allow challenging classification status. Recounts Ellsberg’s prosecution which was dismissed

Several Gareth Peirce statements, first one lays out the history of Assange securing Ecuadorian asylum because he feared US extradition, recaps the Embassy spying case, Assange’s legally privileged property seized from Embassy

Background: Ecuador to hand over Assange's entire legal defense to the United States wikileaks.org/Ecuador-to-han…

Peirce statement discusses her own legal meetings with Assange in the Embassy being spied on, "chilling effect" on preparing for these proceedings

A second statement from Bridget Prince includes the full transcript of Assange's 2010 speech at the Frontline Club, which the prosecution quoted from in cross-examination. This would give proper context. Prosecution objects to the statement being submitted

The defense also wants to include new comments from US Attorney General William Barr which were made during these proceedings (Sept 16th)

The Frontline Club appearance is from the 2010 Q&A Assange conducted by video -- the prosecution tried to say that Assange's answer contradicted testimony about his mental/psychiatric health

Judge says the witness (Dr Deeley) didn't agree that the video contradicted the diagnosis, so it won't be accepted.

Judge also says the Barr speech doesn't reference Assange by name, it's not a significant enough development to include here

(Appears the AG comments are here: justice.gov/opa/speech/rem… along with Washington Post story on the speech, 'Barr accuses Justice Department of headhunting and meddling with politics' washingtonpost.com/national-secur…)

Washington Post on the William Barr speech: "IThe attorney general said it was he, not career officials, who has the ultimate authority to decide how cases should be handled..."

"...and he derided less-experienced, less-senior bureaucrats who current and former prosecutors have long insisted should be left to handle their cases free from interference from political appointees."

Break until 4:05pm London time

Back from recess. Difficult to follow exchange (because we don't have statements under discussion) in which a defense submission ultimately wasn't accepted. Now Mark Summers speaking about another Gareth Peirce statement (there are 5 in total).

The statement includes defense relaying that it has been insufficiently able to present its arguments about 'abuse of process' due to the very late second superseding indictment

Judge's ruling will come on January 4, 2021, 10:00am London time. Done with the evidence phase of the hearing. Defense gets 4 weeks to submit closing arguments, then the prosecution gets 2 weeks to submit in response. Julian will remain in custody until the ruling. #AssangeCase

End of these proceedings. #AssangeCase

Julian will have an obligatory admin court appearance by video on Oct 29th (won't be substantive, he just has to appear in court every 28 days by law). #AssangeCase