(1) If you understand why abortion supporters view a young baby as "just a clump of cells" then you don't use that argument.
They are utterly convinced that the only person who should have a say in the matter is the pregnant woman.
So it's better to use other approaches.
(2) I speak from experience, as someone who only became pro-life in 2016.
I know all the beliefs used as assertions by the "pro-choice" movement.
Distil it down: It's a fight between the fetus and the woman.
(3) I now believe that a fetus should have the same right to life that a pregnant woman has. In almost every case, she had a choice to have sex or not. The fetus had no choice.
If we allow for abortion in cases of rape, it will just be abused by others. That creates more pain.
(4) It's not impossible for a woman to emotionally and mentally survive a pregnancy that resulted from rape.
I'm talking about allowing the fetus to survive, when tens of millions of them don't.
Abortion is murder.
(5) During my #WalkAway process I reviewed every major policy issue in US Presidential elections - there are about 50 main areas.
I realized that if you add up all the harm caused by Democrat policies, the body count is much higher than current Republican policies.
(6) I could no longer support the Democrats in good conscience.
My view has only strengthened in these four years.
They are the party of death. Run for the hills, human beings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well said, @DonnaLeeSun. I have the same approach.
Donna is "Unapologretically Canadian."
I am Unapologetically New Zealander/Kiwi. Granted, "sorry" has a special meaning in Canada, eh? But our countries do have a lot in common. Mini-thread:
I really get what Donna is saying in her Twitter bio:
"Trumpism has a strong foothold in Canada & we ignore it at our peril. Pay attention, esp. to PP, former PM Harper & idiot Premiers!"
The same is true of New Zealand, Australia, and our OG mothership: The UK.
PP stands for Pierre Poilievre, who became the leader of Canada's conservative party on 10 September 2022.
For me it's super simple: Far right extremism gained a foothold in the US, only to be rejected by majorities of voters multiple times since. Because #DemocracyWins.
Evidently, my above use of the term misogyny has triggered a few of them.
They're trying to insinuate that Kohberger was a liberal which, even if true, would have nothing to do with the points made in my tweet. We already know several things about him, and his crimes...
Further, when writing the above list of 5 known and/or confirmed misogynists, some of whom have killed at least one woman, I considered a range of factors that put them on that list.
I want to encourage discussion about misogny and the targeting of women by violent offenders.
Esp. the 2020 US presidential election, and others where right wing governments were (and will soon be) punished for anti- public health and safety, anti-science, ignorant approaches to pandemic response.
Do politicians and their advisers get this yet? In most households, it is one or more women who take basic health and safety seriously, & who develop a superior knowledge base due to our more complex biology, higher rates of illness, & greater need for infection control measures.
Of course there are many men with the same health knowledge and risk management priorities as women, but we are talking about "in general" here, and how that applies to elections.
Gotta laugh, my tweet generated the following reply from a maga account:
"Ukraine flag in bio"
Ad hominem/genetic fallacy is all they have. They deflect by targeting the player not the ball. Because playing the ball is too hard for them. It requires honesty & courage.
I'm talking about changing the way domestic violence incidents are handled, and doing more to put long term distance between known DV offenders and their legal access to guns.
An idea best espoused by the outstanding @BeauTFC. Link to follow.
The outstanding @BeauTFC talked about this issue here:
I wonder what price between $8 billion and $44 billion Elon Howard Hughes Musk might consider to sell this vital pro-democracy communications hub before he completely destroys it.
I mean, that's his goal, right?
He paid waaaay too much for it. Value currently estimated at $8 billion. Surely there are billionaires out there with the ability to build a consortium to entice it out of his grubby little hands?
There's a good argument for the US federal government buying it, too...
Or a group of countries. It's not all about the US, you know.
What does the Putin regime have on Musk, that could get him to over-spend so much money? The global fascist movement is the only winner out of this. Or was it the Mercers?