Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture
Oct 2, 2020 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1/ FASCINATING MOVE by SEC on whether a trust company qualifies as a bank under its rules. This enforcement action doesn't pertain to #crypto specifically but it applies broadly to the key question--does a trust co qualify as a bank under SEC custody rule?
sec.gov/enforce/33-108…
2/ Answer was a resounding "NO" in this case--the trust co didn't qualify for exemptions that apply to banks bc trust co didn't exercise "substantial investment authority." This is a KEY POINT--a trust co that doesn't act as a fiduciary is NOT A BANK under SEC's rules.
3/ This is one of the big reasons why #Wyoming created #SPDI bank charter--bc trust cos are prob not qualified custodians under SEC rules. To be a bank under SEC rules custodian must either (1) take deposits or (2) act as fiduciary. Trust cos can't take deposits (only banks can).
4/ So, to be a qualified custodian, the trust co MUST ACT AS A FIDUCIARY. That's exactly the issue that the SEC raised in this enforcement action against a trust co today. What does it mean to be a fiduciary? Simply put, the trust co must exercise discretion over customer assets.
5/ How many US #crypto custodians that have trust company charters are "exercising discretion over customer assets?" I know of ONLY ONE that meets this standard.

What does this mean for #crypto? It means trust cos that act as custodians in US mkt will need to get bank charters.
6/ Thankfully, #Wyoming's #SPDI charter is available! 🤠 It has been open for applicants for a year now.

Fascinating dissent from @HesterPeirce. She makes some very good points here:
sec.gov/news/public-st…
7/ This topic has been a fault line in the US #crypto regulatory landscape for a while. If a state-chartered trust co doesn't qualify as a bank under the SEC's rules but is claiming a bank's exemptions as if it were, whose job is it to enforce that-the SEC or the state regulator?
8/ Well today SEC answered that question via enforcement action against a state-chartered trust co. Folks-clearest way to be treated as a bank under SEC's rules is actually to be a bank! Thankfully that option is avail to #crypto industry thx to #Wyoming's SPDI. NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠

Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

Sep 30
1/ CALLING OUT A DOUBLE STANDARD: I chewed on @CampbellJAustin's great🧵about selective enforcement against #crypto while protecting #tradfi, which prompted me to review the FTX fraud. Lo & behold, there seems to be ANOTHER pattern of selective enforcement
2/ The FDIC's Inspector General disclosed that 11 US banks "may have had involvement in alleged wire transfer fraud," & I tweeted the below screenshot of it on February 22, 2023:
3/ It was easy to spot 10 of the 11 US banks from the banks listed in FTX's bankruptcy filing at that time, which I posted here👇.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 22
1/ I'M STILL THINKING abt the bombshell Silvergate court filing. Here's the Warren crowd's #crypto bank scorecard:
❌Silvergate--suicided
❌Signature--suicided
❌Protego--OCC approval "expired"
〰️Paxos--ditto, but its non-bank is still going
✅ @custodiabank--survived & fighting
2/ Until the court filing, I didn't know the Fed "suicided" Silvergate by forcing it into an untenable choice👇: make #crypto <15% of its deposits (impossible in a short period of time) or throw in the towel. This touched off a bank panic the next day, costing the FDIC ~$40bn.🤦‍♀️ Image
3/ @BarneyFrank et al made clear at the time that the FDIC "suicided" Signature, but we now know the Fed "suicided" Silvergate too. The timing lines up with the Fed blindsiding @custodiabank with a denial (w/ the White House). It was all coordinated--more than even I realized. Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 22
1/ I DUG INTO the Fed's latest master account list, released last night. The big news is what's happening with OCC-chartered trust companies--2 new ones applied for Fed master accounts. This is noteworthy for several reasons, explained below. Data here: federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems…
2/ But first, among the ~430 Fed master account holders that are not FDIC insured (or equivalent), 11 are trust companies chartered by the OCC: Image
3/ And 4 applicants for new Fed master accounts are OCC-chartered trust companies (of which two were crypto custodians whose applications went inactive amid #OperationChokePoint2.0👇--Paxos "withdrew" in Jan 2024; & Protego's charter approval "expired" in Feb 2023, per the OCC). Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 20
🚨 1/ BOMBSHELL REVELATION that Silvergate was liquid & solvent when the Fed forced it to close changes EVERYTHING when analyzing the March 2023 bank failures. Look at the dates:
* Mar 8: Silvergate voluntarily liquidates
* Mar 10: Silicon Valley fails
* Mar 12: Signature fails Image
2/ Stop & think about that timeline.

Think.

Would Silicon Valley Bank have failed had Silvergate not been forced by the Fed to close just 2 days earlier?

Recall the bank run at Silicon Valley really got started on Mar 9--the day after Silvergate announced it would liquidate.
3/ Reminder: Silvergate cost the FDIC's deposit insurance fund (DIF) nothing.

But the subsequent bank failures cost the FDIC's DIF dearly--Silicon Valley cost it ~$20bn, Signature cost it $2.4bn and First Republic (which failed weeks later, on May 1) cost it $15.6bn.
Read 7 tweets
May 16
DID I JUST SEE US GET SEN KELLY FROM AZ, @twobitidiot ??? 🙌
AND HICKENLOOPER OF CO!!!

Peeps—all these Dems are rejecting @ewarren & crossing the Biden White House. This is more than I’d expected. PEAK WARREN IS OVER!!!
@ewarren AND WE GOT SEN BOOKER…that makes 4 Dems I count, including Gillibrand so far…
Read 7 tweets
Nov 24, 2023
QUIET PART OUT LOUD: they're rightly worried abt Hong Kong via USD stablecoins becoming a hub for USD clearing that's outside US's reach, while the US dithers. But it's not just HK. Obvious fast path for Milei to dollarize Argentina is via USD stablecoins.
ft.com/content/39f101…
2/ 👇But the US (under Sen Warren's control of the Biden Admin's financial svcs policy) is blocking everyone working on regulatory-compliant USD stablecoins, while letting big banks continue to build their own versions.😡 But the world already blew past the walled-garden versions Image
3/ And Warren has admitted what she's really up to: she wants a retail #CBDC in the US. And since she controls the Biden Administration's financial services policy, the US is heading toward a CBDC as long as Biden remains in power.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(