1/ FASCINATING MOVE by SEC on whether a trust company qualifies as a bank under its rules. This enforcement action doesn't pertain to #crypto specifically but it applies broadly to the key question--does a trust co qualify as a bank under SEC custody rule? sec.gov/enforce/33-108…
2/ Answer was a resounding "NO" in this case--the trust co didn't qualify for exemptions that apply to banks bc trust co didn't exercise "substantial investment authority." This is a KEY POINT--a trust co that doesn't act as a fiduciary is NOT A BANK under SEC's rules.
3/ This is one of the big reasons why #Wyoming created #SPDI bank charter--bc trust cos are prob not qualified custodians under SEC rules. To be a bank under SEC rules custodian must either (1) take deposits or (2) act as fiduciary. Trust cos can't take deposits (only banks can).
4/ So, to be a qualified custodian, the trust co MUST ACT AS A FIDUCIARY. That's exactly the issue that the SEC raised in this enforcement action against a trust co today. What does it mean to be a fiduciary? Simply put, the trust co must exercise discretion over customer assets.
5/ How many US #crypto custodians that have trust company charters are "exercising discretion over customer assets?" I know of ONLY ONE that meets this standard.
What does this mean for #crypto? It means trust cos that act as custodians in US mkt will need to get bank charters.
6/ Thankfully, #Wyoming's #SPDI charter is available! 🤠 It has been open for applicants for a year now.
7/ This topic has been a fault line in the US #crypto regulatory landscape for a while. If a state-chartered trust co doesn't qualify as a bank under the SEC's rules but is claiming a bank's exemptions as if it were, whose job is it to enforce that-the SEC or the state regulator?
8/ Well today SEC answered that question via enforcement action against a state-chartered trust co. Folks-clearest way to be treated as a bank under SEC's rules is actually to be a bank! Thankfully that option is avail to #crypto industry thx to #Wyoming's SPDI. NOT LEGAL ADVICE!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Prime Trust's bankruptcy Plan Admin recommended that its #crypto custody customers--who thought they owned the custodied assets--take a haircut. Amount not clear yet (Celsius custody customers took a 27.5% haircut). These situations were sadly avoidable. courtlistener.com/docket/6769170…
2/ Context: bankruptcy is a process designed to maximize the recovery of assets for a bankrupt company's estate, while a bank's receivership is a process designed to protect a bank customers. When a non-bank fails, it goes to bankruptcy. When a bank fails, it goes to receivership
3/ So, the Prime Trust discussion is only a bankruptcy discussion because Prime Trust wasn't a bank.
Prime Trust went bust and has an asset shortfall, so a bankruptcy judge must decide whether its custody customers will get all their assets back or will take a haircut.
1/ NEW BLOG: "How To Keep The #Bitcoin Strategic Reserve From Morphing Into A Bailout Fund." Did you know SBF publicly advocated for a crypto bailout fund just 1 month before FTX failed? Story 👇Lesson: don’t let future Sams hijack the SBR for a bailout!!! caitlin-long.com/how-to-keep-bi…
2/ In the blog I analyze #bitcoin as a reserve asset (key is its favorable inflation rate differential)--but condition my support for a BSR on drafting legislation w/ 4 specific prohibitions to prevent insolvent-but-politically-connected people from ever using it for a bailout:
3/ The favorable inflation rate differential between #bitcoin & US dollar + strategic benefits make bitcoin worth considering as a reserve asset, but the consensus mechanisms of other #crypto can be too easily changed to permit higher inflation so I don't support including them:
🚨HUGE NEWS on #debanking & #OperationChokePoint2.0: a little birdie told me that @FDICgov Vice Chair Travis Hill just spoke at an ABA meeting & said there is no place at the FDIC for those who explicitly or implicitly supported its debanking initiative. Transcript not avail yet
Travis Hill is a Republican & is vice chairman of the FDIC—has been outvoted by Biden/Warrenites on the FDIC board, but that will change on Jan 20 when Gruenberg steps down.
It'll be soooooooo interesting to see if Hill went off-script. Don't forget Gruenberg's people still control the FDIC (head of comms is allegedly trying to silence online critics of #debanking, so I doubt such remarks would've made it thru official editing of his speech, which should be posted at this site soon): fdic.gov/news/speeches
1/ 🚨THE FED'S DEBANKER-IN-CHIEF IS OUT! Michael Barr, the last remaining Biden/Warren appointee who architected #OperationChokePoint2.0 at a federal financial agency, will resign as vice chair for supervision in Feb (see @nic__carter's March 2023 map👇). federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pre…
2/ It was an open secret in DC that Trump was likely to fire him. He had a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad reign as Fed Vice Chair for Supervision--the WSJ covered only some of why 👇, calling him "a favorite of Elizabeth Warren" but omitting a lot: wsj.com/opinion/a-fede…
3/ Barr siloed information within the Fed, as of Oct 2022 sending Fed supervision staff a memo prohibiting them from talking to other Fed governors unless they’d spoken with him first👇
1/ NEW FACTS REVEALED: 2 years ago today, the Fed quietly hammered 5 banks & thereby kicked off its industry-wide dragnet against banks serving the #crypto industry. @joerogan & @pmarca recently made discussions about #debanking go mainstream, which makes today’s anniv notable.
2/ On the Sunday after Thanksgiving 2022 (11/27/22), the Fed hit the first of these 5 banks w/ regulatory actions targeting their crypto activities, and its blitz carried into the following work week. Thus began what @nic__carter would later dub #OperationChokePoint2.0.
3/ How did I learn these facts? I pieced together public info + info from insiders who came forward & filled in puzzle pieces for me. I know the 5 banks’ names but won’t disclose them here. Publicly-available info confirms @custodiabank was one of them.
1/ HOW TO FIX THE U.S. DEBANKING PROBLEM, a 🧵by someone who set out to solve it but ended up repeatedly targeted by it (+ whose bank has a lawsuit against the Fed pertaining to it).
This is a #MeToo-type moment in banking, as stories are now pouring out.
How to fix it?
2/ As @pmarca alluded on @joerogan, the levers of power used/abused by federal bank regulators to effectuate #debanking are subtle & insidious. Multiple attempts have already been made to fix the problem. Why did they all fail? bc it's a multi-faceted problem that runs deep.
3/ Truly fixing the problem will require overhauling the federal bank examination process for operating banks. Why? a) subjective levers in federal bank exams have proven to be too easily politicized, b) confidentiality of supervisory info & c) no checks & balances in practice.