Thread by @WomensLibFront

Some people are very shocked to read that there are lesbians and radical feminists who worry that their years of work raising fundamental concerns about gender identity are being ignored in favor of the watered down messages of more politically palatable men. Why?

Why hasn’t this perspective been more widely voiced, such that when many people hear it for the first time, they are alarmed? There are a lot of radical feminists who don’t think that women’s groups should be platforming men calling themselves women. Why is this unspeakable?

For years, the wives of AGP men, whose families were devastated by a mid-life transition, have been similarly silenced and sidelined by some who were more interested in superficial respectability than prioritizing women hurt by gender identity.

uncommongroundmedia.com/which-side-are…

Some women prominent in UK Labour political circles have gone out of their way to stage manage the movement to critique gender identity as a typical ‘rainbow coalition’ space, as is common to big tent, leftist campaigning, that expressly includes men identifying as women.

But when you insist on being recognized as a women’s movement, there are some of us who think that needs to mean that you’re about women, under a definition of women that never includes men. This view has been disrespected and no-platformed within UK gender critical circles.

Why are women who don’t want men in their movement angry? The question practically answers itself, considering. Especially when some of the women who are forcing this teaming have sharp elbows in demanding leftist ideological purity, and woke political sensibilities.