(2) When he said those words I had to re-listen a few times to be sure of what he meant. No doubt, our opponents will exploit the ambiguity.
He means: I had the option of hiding away, or moving to my offices here, and I moved here because (many reasons, including:)
(3) That his decisions are always based on what is best for the USA and the world. Those two audiences could really do with an optimism boost right now.
Think about the character of the Chinese regime, and want they wanted out of this pandemic. (Whether LIHOP or planned.)
(4) Trump has always had a great gift in turning a bad situation around. And he has studied history's great leaders, esp. Churchill, who gave the archetypal example of an effective leader in a crisis.
Churchill was fucking extraordinary. And he had pneumonia, at the WH.
(5) Like Trump, Churchill was constantly criticized for his lifestyle choices, and it's a miracle that he lived to the age of 90, while smoking cigars, drinking heavily, being obese (in later life), sleeping little (at times) and doing one stressful job after the other.
(6) I could write about Churchill and Trump all day so I'll stop there, lol.
Trump wants to be a "great leader" bc that is what America needs. Objectively, he already is one.
This event is just another choice between courage and weakness. He chose courage, & kept on working.
(7) You can hear in his voice and breathing, that Trump does indeed have a (mild) upper respiratory tract infection. It could get worse, & he admits that, more than once.
I'd be extremely surprised if it did, but I'd survive. He's not the only great leader on the GOP bench.
(8) When we got the news of the Trumps' positive test results, I knew they would handle it very well, but they have exceeded even my expectations.
Very high chance that in a few weeks, folk everywhere will be more optimistic and courageous about the challenges we still face.
(9) Don't let the losers get you down. Ignore or laugh at them.
We're the adults in the room; the worst of the Democrats just keep on digging. Swing voters, and many hitherto Democrat voters, see it clear as day now.
Well said, @DonnaLeeSun. I have the same approach.
Donna is "Unapologretically Canadian."
I am Unapologetically New Zealander/Kiwi. Granted, "sorry" has a special meaning in Canada, eh? But our countries do have a lot in common. Mini-thread:
I really get what Donna is saying in her Twitter bio:
"Trumpism has a strong foothold in Canada & we ignore it at our peril. Pay attention, esp. to PP, former PM Harper & idiot Premiers!"
The same is true of New Zealand, Australia, and our OG mothership: The UK.
PP stands for Pierre Poilievre, who became the leader of Canada's conservative party on 10 September 2022.
For me it's super simple: Far right extremism gained a foothold in the US, only to be rejected by majorities of voters multiple times since. Because #DemocracyWins.
Evidently, my above use of the term misogyny has triggered a few of them.
They're trying to insinuate that Kohberger was a liberal which, even if true, would have nothing to do with the points made in my tweet. We already know several things about him, and his crimes...
Further, when writing the above list of 5 known and/or confirmed misogynists, some of whom have killed at least one woman, I considered a range of factors that put them on that list.
I want to encourage discussion about misogny and the targeting of women by violent offenders.
Esp. the 2020 US presidential election, and others where right wing governments were (and will soon be) punished for anti- public health and safety, anti-science, ignorant approaches to pandemic response.
Do politicians and their advisers get this yet? In most households, it is one or more women who take basic health and safety seriously, & who develop a superior knowledge base due to our more complex biology, higher rates of illness, & greater need for infection control measures.
Of course there are many men with the same health knowledge and risk management priorities as women, but we are talking about "in general" here, and how that applies to elections.
Gotta laugh, my tweet generated the following reply from a maga account:
"Ukraine flag in bio"
Ad hominem/genetic fallacy is all they have. They deflect by targeting the player not the ball. Because playing the ball is too hard for them. It requires honesty & courage.
I'm talking about changing the way domestic violence incidents are handled, and doing more to put long term distance between known DV offenders and their legal access to guns.
An idea best espoused by the outstanding @BeauTFC. Link to follow.
The outstanding @BeauTFC talked about this issue here:
I wonder what price between $8 billion and $44 billion Elon Howard Hughes Musk might consider to sell this vital pro-democracy communications hub before he completely destroys it.
I mean, that's his goal, right?
He paid waaaay too much for it. Value currently estimated at $8 billion. Surely there are billionaires out there with the ability to build a consortium to entice it out of his grubby little hands?
There's a good argument for the US federal government buying it, too...
Or a group of countries. It's not all about the US, you know.
What does the Putin regime have on Musk, that could get him to over-spend so much money? The global fascist movement is the only winner out of this. Or was it the Mercers?