Plez, @azharaslam sir I think you need to brush up ur historical facts as it's showing dingy now. Let me enlighten some of your dimness with my sober capacity as a staunch learner of history.🙏🙏
https://twitter.com/Arzookazmi30/status/1312444993357836288
1.Sir,first of all Chhatrapati Maharaja Shivaji is not only the rulers of Hindus rather he formed the genesis of the Maratha Empire. In 1674. He was the 'Chhatrapati' ( emperor) of his realm like what Alamgir was for Mughals.
So, as an emperor he's the leader of all people who settled in his kingdom irrespective of any caste-creed-religion.
2. Chhatrapati was not adhered with any communal atrocity like what Alamgir did with Hindus. Even staunch critics of Maharaj couldn't point a single incident.
2. Chhatrapati was not adhered with any communal atrocity like what Alamgir did with Hindus. Even staunch critics of Maharaj couldn't point a single incident.
3. FYI, there were so-many talukas ( village-clusters) which were muslim dominated in 'Swarajya' but were never discriminated like imposition of 'Jizya' by Alamgir in 1679.
Dr. sahab,I think for u Jizya is a secular tax.Isn't it ?
Dr. sahab,I think for u Jizya is a secular tax.Isn't it ?
4.There were few muslim generals in the Maharaj's army .
Do you know who was Siddi Hilal & Darya Sarang,Noor Khan Baig, Kazi Hyder,Daulat Khan--who were these guys?..
I can give u the details but I think first u need to search the details before asserting Maharaj with anything.
Do you know who was Siddi Hilal & Darya Sarang,Noor Khan Baig, Kazi Hyder,Daulat Khan--who were these guys?..
I can give u the details but I think first u need to search the details before asserting Maharaj with anything.
I can only say that if he was a emperor of Hindus only , how could it possible to get those muslims high ranks in his army ?
5. Yes, Maharaj had a conflict with them be it his own treacherous Maratha-clan leaders, or be it Mughal plunderers who were destroying our culture .
5. Yes, Maharaj had a conflict with them be it his own treacherous Maratha-clan leaders, or be it Mughal plunderers who were destroying our culture .
He had a long struggle with AdilShahi Dynasty & Mughals to establish his ' Hindavi Swarajya (Indian self-rule)' .That was not an idea of kingdom based on religion like what Alamgir dreamed for 'Dar-al-Islam'.
7. So, probably you right when you said Alamgir was merely a emperor of Muslims though he had a ruler of a Hindu dominated realm.
Though in my view a ruler couldn't represent an entire religion.
Though in my view a ruler couldn't represent an entire religion.
Even in Islam there are various ramifications.Alamgir merely supported the 'Hanafi' school of thought then how could he represent the whole community.
Actually, it was an animosity against Hindus made Alamgir a hero of a community if at all you consider him.
Actually, it was an animosity against Hindus made Alamgir a hero of a community if at all you consider him.
8. Chhatrapati was not only a great king actually but also a legend. He was the saviour of 'Indian culture' from invaders in that time. So, if @majorgauravarya mentioned the name of maharaj that wouldn't show any communal angle from any side of rationality.
Hazaar-o saal-o me koi ak Chhatrapati jaise paida hota hay unhe ak mamuli emperor se compare nahi kiya jaa sakta..
I think now,some of ur haziness would obliterate.🙏🙏
What do you think guys??
@timepass178 @SweetKmina @msmeabc0 @Arzookazmi30 @AnirCareer @vernaculartube
I think now,some of ur haziness would obliterate.🙏🙏
What do you think guys??
@timepass178 @SweetKmina @msmeabc0 @Arzookazmi30 @AnirCareer @vernaculartube
@nationalistadar @Bhupendra26 @AiliaZehra @Binu231272Amit @fakharzai7 @TarekFatah @AmjadAyubMirza1 @SanjayShindeG9
@Sujataganguly13 @spartan4evr1 @SortedEagle @Shubham21ee @sarcasmtica @Ravisha23624235 @KauraSahit @vaibhavUP65 @biharigurl
@Sujataganguly13 @spartan4evr1 @SortedEagle @Shubham21ee @sarcasmtica @Ravisha23624235 @KauraSahit @vaibhavUP65 @biharigurl
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
