Mordaunt: Many have pointed to the fact that the EU has struggled to treat the UK as a sovereign equal in these negotiations, and we must ensure that not just at the end of transition but further down the line our sovereignty is fully protected and restored
Mordaunt: it won't be until negotiations have concluded that the issues around the Protocol that JC and specialised cttee will be able to conclude their work. [asked if the UK wd bring more leg forward which wd disapply aspects of the Protocol]
Mordaunt keeps referring to "negotiations" at JC level; the EU regard the JC as simply implementing what has already been negotiated
Mordaunt: [makes a clear pitch for keeping the IMB clauses as a insurance policy] Says the "ECJ years from now might take a particular view which, unless we are alive to that fact, might open up problems for us".

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Connelly

Tony Connelly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tconnellyRTE

5 Oct
Mordaunt: we have negotiated in good faith, we have made reasonable demands in these negotiations [ie in the Joint Committee]
Mordaunt: it is the fact that we have been having negotiations for some time and still haven't had the reassurances... All these issues have been continually raised throughout our discussions
Q: Was it made clear if the EU was less obdurate then the UK would have no alternative but to put clauses in the IMB? Mordaunt doesn't directly answer, says she wasn't privy to some discussions [I think, extremely hard to hear her]...
Read 4 tweets
5 Oct
.@PennyMordaunt tells HoC European Scrutiny Committee that the Internal Market Bill is a "safety net" but "we hope negotiations and work in the specialised committee will mean we will not require" the IMB.
[ie, clauses 42-45 etc]
Mordaunt: says UK raised issues about the state aid element in the NI protocol and exit summary declarations with the Joint Committee before the introduction of the IMB, both formally and informally.
Read 7 tweets
3 Oct
Joint Statement by @vonderleyen & @BorisJohnson:
"The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and the UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, spoke today about the state of play in the negotiations on the future relationship between the UK and the EU.
“They agreed on the importance of finding an agreement, if at all possible, as a strong basis for a strategic EU-UK relationship in future.
“They endorsed the assessment of both Chief Negotiators that progress had been made in recent weeks but that significant gaps remained, notably but not only in the areas of fisheries, the level playing field, and governance.
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct
NEW: Taoiseach Micheál Martin says legal action against the UK “to be expected. We support the Commission in its actions”
Taoiseach “I think [legal action] was to be expected and we support the Commission in its actions. It did give the United Kingdom a month to respond in reation to withdrawing the Internal Market Bill and the unilateral action it took in relation to the Northern Ireland Protocol"
2/ The Taoiseach they he and @vonderleyen discussed how the EU would deal with Brexit over the coming weeks. He said there was concern across Europe over the unilateral action by the UK on the Protocol, and the need for the UK to “resile” from that.
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
Some evidence from BASF regulatory affairs manager Neil Hollis at the Future Relationship with the EU Committee. He was asked about the impact of the UK having to come out of the EU's REACH system for registering chemicals, and having to create a new one for the UK:
1/ "We are extremely concerned about this. Registration costs [for the UK] are estimated to be £1 bn across the industry. This will bring no tangible benefit to enhancing safety from chemicals, and it will disadvantage UK industry in terms of global supply chain competitiveness.
2/ "This cost will be a disincentive to register chemicals or chemical volumes which are now available across the EU and UK. To put it bluntly, chemicals which are now available across the EU and UK ...will remain on the EU market, but will disappear from the UK market.
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
.@MarosSefcovic says Uk needs to "accelerate work need to ensure full timely and effective implementation of the NI Protocol."

"Much work needs to be done, the window of opportunity to put in place the operational measures for Protocol to function is rapidly closing."
Sefcovic says work still needed on SPS controls at NI ports, customs-related IT systems, registration of NI traders for VAT purposes…

Says many difficulties remain, and that the UK position is "far apart" from what EU expects on implementation of the Protocol
During this morning's Joint Committe mtg the EU repeated its request for the UK to withdraw the contentious aspects of the IMB, which is "an extremely serious violation" of the WA. …WA is to be implemented, not renegotiated…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!