The funny thing about gravity is that it's very weak compared with the other forces, but it's also the dominant force shaping the universe on large scales. Sound confusing?

Consider...

Weak: You can overcome the gravity of the entire Earth with just a small magnet.
Dominant: Gravity (indirectly) produces things like this. These are plasma jets shooting out of the core of a galaxy. These jets extend for hundreds of thousands of lys, like streams from a colossal cosmic firehose, big enough to dwarf the galaxy from which they're emanating.
Those plasma jets were produced by a supermassive black hole actively feeding on material. As interstellar gas pours down onto the black hole, the extreme gravity near the black hole speeds it up until it forms a surrounding, super-heated disk of matter. (see illustration below)
This superhot disk of matter generates torqued up magnetic fields that act as cosmic particle accelerators, shooting gargantuan streams of charged particles into intergalactic space. And it's all ultimately powered by the same force that's overpowered by a fridge magnet on Earth.
Let's round this out with a gorgeous image of the radio galaxy, Centaurus A. This is a composite image showing the galaxy and its twin jets, powered by a supermassive black hole in its core, at visible wavelengths + radio (orange) and X-ray (blue) wavelengths.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Salviander

Sarah Salviander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarahsalviander

6 Oct
I have no idea how anyone who's read Genesis and knows anything about the history and development of the Earth can say this. It's so utterly, nakedly false that I can only surmise that people repeat it because they assume or want it to be true.

So, a thread about Genesis. Image
Here are some of the scientifically-verifiable claims made by Genesis:

The universe was created (Gen 1:1) ✔️
Earth initially did not exist (Gen 1:2) ✔️
Continents appeared first (Gen 1:9) ✔️
Then oceans formed (Gen 1:10) ✔️
First life was plant life (Gen 1:11) ✔️
Seed-bearing plants appear (Gen 1:11) ✔️
Sun and Moon become visible from Earth (Gen 1:15) ✔️
Animal life starts in the oceans (Gen 1:20) ✔️
Flying creatures appear (Gen 1:20) ✔️
Giant aquatic animals appear (Gen 1:21) ✔️
Other aquatic animals appear (Gen 1:21) ✔️
Read 9 tweets
21 Sep
If you think you have devastating arguments against God, that's fine, but keep in mind:

1. You don't.
2. Seriously, you don't.

Lack of religious education, and of education in general, has made rhetorically snappy but vapid arguments seem powerful.
I'm not singling atheists out here. Christians often fall for this stuff, because many don't understand Christianity, science, math, or philosophy any better than those making the vapid arguments.

Whatever your beliefs, you're not helping yourself by not knowing these things.
Whether you're Christian or atheist, treat yourself to a classical education. Learn the essentials of Christian belief, read the church fathers, study the great philosophers, learn the basics of modern science, become literate in math, and read great works of literature.
Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
Be cautious about 'truth' in science. If a scientific model matches observations and makes good predictions, does that mean it's 'true'? Well, consider that the Earth-centered model of the solar system matched observations and made good predictions by the standards of the time. Image
That's one reason it lasted for 2,000 years.

In fact, the Earth-centered model made better predictions than the Copernican model. Did that make it true?

It wasn't until Kepler eliminated Copernicus' epicycles (yes, Copernicus had epicycles in his model), changed the orbits…
…of planets from circular to elliptical, and eliminated uniform orbital speeds, that the Sun-centered model surpassed the Earth-centered in accuracy. We have enough data at this point to consider the Sun-centered model very likely true. But quite often in science…
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep
A big part of science is asking the right questions. We've been looking for signs of life elsewhere in the universe, but how do we know we'd be able to detect them even if life is out there? One way to answer that question is to send a probe far into space... Image
...and see if it detects signs of life on the one place we know for certain it exists in the universe—Earth! That was one of the goals of the Venus Express mission. Launched in late 2005, it was sent millions of miles away to study Venus. But while it was there, astronomers... Image
... turned it towards Earth to see if it could detect signs of habitability on our own planet. It detected certain molecules associated with life in Earth's atmosphere, but the problem is, Venus shows the same signs and it's not habitable. Astronomers hope to fine-tune... Image
Read 4 tweets
7 Sep
The science of biology owes as much of its development to amateurs as astronomy does. From 17th-19th centuries, a ton of work was done by amateurs interested in natural theology – much of it by country parsons – inspired by synthesis of Aristotelian biology and Christian belief. Image
As Pearcey & Thaxton point out in their book, "The Soul of Science," natural theology was not a god-of-the-gaps argument, and did not arise out of what was not known at the time. Rather, it arose from the EXPANSION of knowledge about the complexity of life.
The marriage of Greek wisdom and Christian faith produced modern science. Most of us don't learn this in school or university, and that's deliberate. The "warfare" idea, of science and religion pitted against each other in an epic struggle, is a lie. Yes, there are times when...
Read 6 tweets
2 Sep
Almost all of y'all agree that we need to be Christian case-makers. There were more than a few dissenters in the comments, though, so let's talk about this.

WHY are we obligated to be case-makers, and what does it mean to be one?
Well, for one thing, it's in scripture. As many of you pointed out, 1 Peter 3:15 is pretty clear on the matter. Second, as Wallace and many others have pointed out, if you genuinely believe the good news, if you believe that Jesus saves, how could you NOT share that?
And to your credit, many of you do share. The question is, how is that most effectively done? Relating personal experiences can be powerful, but eventually people will want to know more. Can you testify to the truth of scripture beyond just personal experience? Yes, you can.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!