Incidents like this have been going on in the US and Canada for years, and we got almost no coverage of it until we started going to the conservative press.
Because of harassment here in the US, there may not be quite 20 liberal women in the country who would show up to a public event and speak under her own name, in opposition to gender identity, and they live all over.
So the cost of putting on any speaking event almost always involves flying speakers in from out of town, often from hundreds of miles away, maybe 3,000 miles away, and putting them up overnight in rented accommodations. You also have to pay for private security in most cases.
Either that, or we have to go to the middle of nowhere, not near an airport, hours of driving away from a large population center, to have a less costly gathering in peace.
The geographic expanse of the United States, alone, has made it phenomenally expensive to put on gender critical events in person in the US, prior to the pandemic.
Why haven’t we done things like they did in the UK yet? That’s part of why. It isn’t that no one’s thought of it.
When we held our Cancelled Women panel in NYC this January, we had to fly speakers in from the UK and Canada.
For the Fighting The New Misogyny event in Seattle, in February, speakers had to be flown in from Canada, DC, and California. And when it involves such a long trip, speakers with families, or other inflexible obligations, will be under-represented.
There have been other events, and other groups putting on events, but the barriers to participation and affordability have meant that they were generally one-off productions, rather than sustained efforts.
If there’s a small bright spot in having everyone stay home, it’s the increased necessity of, and interest in, online events. While in-person events are still going to be valuable, and we’d love to have more when it’s possible again, going virtual has made many things easier.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s disturbing to see so many secular humanist men come out for sterilizing children, and then portraying the broad opposition to it as being the partisan tool of their traditional political enemies. Here’s where unthinking tribalism leads:
Women also didn’t need people of any political persuasion or faith belief to know that we are real human beings, and not a costume that a man can wear. It has rather been increasingly alarming to watch secular humanist men keep doubling down on denying our existence.
Indeed, that broad class of men who’ve spent the last several years marking themselves most likely to say, of themselves, “This is what a feminist looks like,” have become the most likely to endorse child sterilization and deny the existence of women as a sex class.
The most ridiculous thing that some insist on importing into the women’s rights movement from SJW/woke discourse is the performance of “fear” regarding people that the speaker can’t credibly be considered to be afraid of in the least.
It’s an incredible statement, as in, not credible in the least, to suggest that radical feminists or gender critical people generally, are afraid of women who’ve never called for harm to anyone, support basic human rights for all, & explicitly reject ideas of ethnic superiority.
When critical theory-motivated extremism, and political partisanship, is centered in feminism, the beneficiaries are inevitably misogynistic men on the left who seem to have always been looking for an excuse to call us “feminazis.”
We talk about the denial of communist genocides, odd as that subject may seem to some, because there are still extremists around who deny them, and will say that everyone who knows they happened are using Nazi talking points.
Surely such people would find it odd if an American denied that many Native Americans were wiped out during colonization, or denied the bombing of Hiroshima. It would be bizarre if a British person were to deny the firebombing of Dresden, which happened even if Nazis did say so.
But there’s a certain sort of person on the extreme left who seems to feel required to believe that Stalin & Mao were great guys, and reports of their mass murders were greatly exaggerated. We even saw someone say in this last week that the One Child Policy was feminist.
We’ve been asked our thoughts on fixing the US Equality Act, and have seen some proposals for this. To date, what we’ve seen has been unsatisfactory, as it introduces genderist language into civil rights law.
To use phrases like "transgender people," “transgender status,” or “gender identity,” introduces undefinable categories into civil rights law. There are people who identify as transgender, but the term, as a practical matter, refers to no objective class of person.
We hold that all people should be protected from sex stereotype discrimination on the basis of sex, their actual sex.
If the left’s message to people concerned about the destruction of women’s sports is going to continue to track genderist retorts, like, “or you could just tell your weak *** daughters to get in the gym,” it may become a problem for them.
When women tried to raise these concerns from within the US left, from within progressive and Democratic circles, because we cared about the fate of movements that we’d invested so much energy and care into supporting, we got shunned, fired, and blacklisted.
Many women tried many different avenues for raising concerns. Not just WoLF members, not just women we personally know. As the takeovers of private discussion and movement spaces proceeded, there’s almost always been one or more women who questioned before getting shut down.
Let’s talk about civility in the movement. For years now, many radical and lesbian feminists have been told by leading names in UK gender critical feminism to shut up about men presenting as women getting elevated as leading spokespeople for women’s rights.
UK women, who’ve had more opportunities to network and more media presence, have dominated this conversation globally. This is surely because of structural factors operating in their favor, rather than intent. They were only going about their own business, and mainly still are.
We discussed the structural factors in a previous thread, but in sum, US feminists were largely silenced & shut out of the media before the full force of the gender identity policies rolled into place, in the UK, gender activists couldn’t get it done in time to quash complaints.