If the left’s message to people concerned about the destruction of women’s sports is going to continue to track genderist retorts, like, “or you could just tell your weak *** daughters to get in the gym,” it may become a problem for them.
When women tried to raise these concerns from within the US left, from within progressive and Democratic circles, because we cared about the fate of movements that we’d invested so much energy and care into supporting, we got shunned, fired, and blacklisted.
Many women tried many different avenues for raising concerns. Not just WoLF members, not just women we personally know. As the takeovers of private discussion and movement spaces proceeded, there’s almost always been one or more women who questioned before getting shut down.
We just get ignored, at best. At worst, we lose our livelihoods, and then get lectured about fighting extremism by men who threaten feminists and compare us to fascists.
When the institutional leaders of the various nonprofits, international NGOs, political parties, grassroots networks, and media organizations that call themselves the left, broadly, put us in the crosshairs of men like this, it was a choice they made.
We would have made a different choice, and we said so. We will keep saying so.
PS: “There is literally nothing you can do about me and my dick being in changing rooms. Hahahahaha hahaha,” may also not prove to be the vote-winning crowd-pleaser that some people seem to think it is. Just a thought.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We’ve been asked our thoughts on fixing the US Equality Act, and have seen some proposals for this. To date, what we’ve seen has been unsatisfactory, as it introduces genderist language into civil rights law.
To use phrases like "transgender people," “transgender status,” or “gender identity,” introduces undefinable categories into civil rights law. There are people who identify as transgender, but the term, as a practical matter, refers to no objective class of person.
We hold that all people should be protected from sex stereotype discrimination on the basis of sex, their actual sex.
Let’s talk about civility in the movement. For years now, many radical and lesbian feminists have been told by leading names in UK gender critical feminism to shut up about men presenting as women getting elevated as leading spokespeople for women’s rights.
UK women, who’ve had more opportunities to network and more media presence, have dominated this conversation globally. This is surely because of structural factors operating in their favor, rather than intent. They were only going about their own business, and mainly still are.
We discussed the structural factors in a previous thread, but in sum, US feminists were largely silenced & shut out of the media before the full force of the gender identity policies rolled into place, in the UK, gender activists couldn’t get it done in time to quash complaints.
There are some people in the gender critical movement, and within radical feminism, even, that we agree with more than others, or whose tone and focus we prefer. We don’t work with ethnic nationalists or tankies. But, as a group that works with conservative Christians ...
... who are we to say that people working to protect women’s rights and children’s health must all agree with each other, or always like each other, to get good work done? This is a big struggle we’re undertaking, and there’s more to do than all of us put together can yet manage.
We’ve seen the struggles with coalition work, how hard and stressful it can be, how it can wear on one’s patience even when everyone is doing their level best to be kind and polite. This is universal though, and not unique to this issue or some particular group of people.
Some people are very shocked to read that there are lesbians and radical feminists who worry that their years of work raising fundamental concerns about gender identity are being ignored in favor of the watered down messages of more politically palatable men. Why?
Why hasn’t this perspective been more widely voiced, such that when many people hear it for the first time, they are alarmed? There are a lot of radical feminists who don’t think that women’s groups should be platforming men calling themselves women. Why is this unspeakable?
For years, the wives of AGP men, whose families were devastated by a mid-life transition, have been similarly silenced and sidelined by some who were more interested in superficial respectability than prioritizing women hurt by gender identity.
Must be a coincidence that there’s another account followed by the usual suspects that compares us unfavorably to fascists, while insisting in a pinned statement that anyone who calls them similar names will get blocked?
Do some of you think you own knowing that sex is real?
Does it maybe just look a little too petty, now that you’re all such a big deal, to keep trashing women who’ve done nothing to you from your main accounts?
Or did you realize when you put out that embarrassing analysis of Bostock, and it was proved wrong, that you didn’t know enough about the situation in the US to win an actual battle of ideas about strategy in a country you just seem to blindly hate and care nothing for?
People keep wanting to drag us back into their partisan leftist political projects, and that’s just not going to happen, for some several reasons.
Chiefly, we’re a tax-deductible charity, and we can’t say anything about whether or not people running for office had ought to be elected, because it’s against the law.
This is a sensible rule that prevents the government from subsidizing political contributions with tax deductions. It would be good if people would stop asking us to break this law, then getting mad when we won’t.