Patient with advancing CKD, currently stage 4. Labs show HCO3 19 on the last two lab draws. Anion gap 13. What do you do?
So the current thinking is that correcting metabolic acidosis (CO2 < 22) slows the progression of CKD. This has been shown in RCTs with oral sodium bicarbonate (placebo controlled):
And with fruits and vegetables that have a high alkali so correct acidosis without the pesky sodium load of baking soda (visual abstract by yours truly)
All of these studies enrolled patients based on a low serum bicarb, none of them requires an ABG to confirm that the low bicarb was representative of metabolic acidosis rather than respiratory alkalosis.
Though the above studies were positive despite theoretically enrolling at least a few patients with respiratory alkalosis, it's hard for me to imagine that giving alkali is anything but harmful in patients who are already alkalotic.
So what about my patient? Here is the ABG...
It shows a well compensated chronic respiratory alkalosis. No baking soda for you.
Correct answer C
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How not to write a letter of recommendation for nephrology fellowship
How to write a letter of recommendation for nephrology fellowship:
1. know your audience. Offer to write letters to programs where you know key people. When I read letters from people I know it moves the needle. Otherwise not so much.
2. Be honest. Don't lie and exaggerate the skills of an applicant. We received a letter with glowing praise for a fellow who turned out to be less than stellar. I no longer trust that program's LOR. In this game it is one strike and you are out.
If you have a patient with cerebral edema from acute hyponatremia you need to 3% Saline first and ask questions later.
3/ If patients have hyponatremia and have severe symptoms it is 150 ml of 3% then recheck the sodium and give another 150 ml of 3% (I'm using the European guidelines) eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/…
New study on HCQ for post exposure prophylaxis. TL;DR it didn't work...
...but a well done RCT has many other gems to uncover, here we have good data on the risk of transmission following unprotected exposure...about 14%
But be careful with that number because 100 people were excluded from randomization because they got sick within 24 hours, and we probably shouldn't exclude them in our assessment of the rate of infection. So that comes to 23% That's higher than I would have expected.