How many from the RW can explain the logic of पृश्य-अस्पृश्य विवेक (What to Touch and What Not To Touch) or छूआछूत as many call it?
https://twitter.com/jalatapas/status/1313520684232916992?s=20
Arre!! Abv was genuine question. Not political argument. I asked because you used "शास्त्र सम्मत परम्परा".
शास्त्र तो किसी के साथ अन्याय नही कर सकता। अगर करेगा तो अधर्म करने वाला हो जायेगा। पृश्य-अस्पृश्य का विज्ञान क्या है यह मेरा प्रश्न था।
शास्त्र तो किसी के साथ अन्याय नही कर सकता। अगर करेगा तो अधर्म करने वाला हो जायेगा। पृश्य-अस्पृश्य का विज्ञान क्या है यह मेरा प्रश्न था।
https://twitter.com/jalatapas/status/1313530475823026176?s=20
I asked a simple question that what's the logic behind the decision to touch or not touch an object/person etc.
Aap Simple language mein batao. So that everybody can understand it.
Aap Simple language mein batao. So that everybody can understand it.
https://twitter.com/jalatapas/status/1313585800756432897?s=20
You are merely repeating Smiritis. I am asking whether it can be explained in a self-consistent way. Remember I am not asking to explain using science.
https://twitter.com/jalatapas/status/1313694463504510976?s=20
"this is what shaastra-sammat means."
I know that. But quoting will work for those who have Shraddha and Vishwas in Shaashtra. But Aajkal ke Hindus ki Shaashtra se Jyada Shraddha apni Buddhi par hai. To unke to cause-effect ke term mein batana padega na.
I know that. But quoting will work for those who have Shraddha and Vishwas in Shaashtra. But Aajkal ke Hindus ki Shaashtra se Jyada Shraddha apni Buddhi par hai. To unke to cause-effect ke term mein batana padega na.
https://twitter.com/jalatapas/status/1313696083424342016?s=20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
