New York Times contributing writer calls for "international intervention" in American internal affairs and calls for our country to be put under "United Nations oversight." nytimes.com/2020/10/06/opi…
NYT is the prog establishment calling for UN intervention in the American elections if Joe Biden doesn't win.
"Joe Biden should ... appeal to the world for help" if President Trump doesn't cave in to a maneuver to hijack the presidential transition, the NYT writer says.
"Joe Biden should ... appeal to the world for help" if President Trump doesn't cave in to a maneuver to hijack the presidential transition, the NYT writer says.
This is insane. @JoeBiden hasn't denounced this nonsense at all: "For many Americans — raised to see the United States as the natural leader of the 'free world' — it may be hard to imagine requesting foreign intervention against tyranny [Trump] in our own land."
The NYT writer, Peter Beinart, invokes Communist Party figures W.E.B. DuBois and Paul Robeson to legitimize his view that the UN should intervene in America.
He also invokes Malcolm X.
He also invokes Malcolm X.
The NYT argument is that United Nations observers are needed to watch American polling places in order to fight "racism."
(Hard to do with #CheatByMail, but move along...)
(Hard to do with #CheatByMail, but move along...)
"Democrats should spend the coming weeks working to ensure that this year’s OSCE observer mission ... can do exactly that.... Democrats should use the OSCE’s report as evidence in an appeal to ... the U.N. Human Rights Council," the NYT writer says.
The NYT wants to reduce the United States of America to banana republic status.
"[Democrats] should also lodge a complaint with the Organization of American States ... which in 2009 used that mandate to suspend Honduras after its government carried out a coup."
"[Democrats] should also lodge a complaint with the Organization of American States ... which in 2009 used that mandate to suspend Honduras after its government carried out a coup."
Wreck the USA:
"While appealing to international bodies may not change the election’s result, it could change the Democratic Party itself. Today many prominent Democrats remain enthralled by the very myths about American exceptionalism that Black activists have long challenged."
"While appealing to international bodies may not change the election’s result, it could change the Democratic Party itself. Today many prominent Democrats remain enthralled by the very myths about American exceptionalism that Black activists have long challenged."
This NYT piece by @PeterBeinart is terrifying. The author literally views America as morally equivalent to Communist China.
"Americans are not so inherently virtuous that they can safely disregard the moral discipline that international oversight provides," he says.
"Americans are not so inherently virtuous that they can safely disregard the moral discipline that international oversight provides," he says.
NYT writer @PeterBeinart makes the following statement as a LAMENT:
"In practice, international do-gooders at the United Nations and Organization of American States are virtually powerless against the most powerful government on earth."
"In practice, international do-gooders at the United Nations and Organization of American States are virtually powerless against the most powerful government on earth."
The writer also argues that the Democrats should enable the United Nations and other international organizations to override any of the 50 American states that ban foreign "observers" from intervening in our voting process.
.@PeterBeinart invokes Paul Robeson, whom a Washington Post piece called an "unrepentant Stalinist," to show why the UN should intervene in American elections. washingtonpost.com/opinions/paul-…
.@PeterBeinart also invoked W.E.B. DuBois, a member of the Communist Party, to argue for the Democrats to allow UN intervention in American politics. cpusa.org/article/the-le…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
