No covid relief until next year unless we hand him a second term.
If anybody thinks it's worth taking him up on this, just look at his life-long history of walking away from deals after he gets what he wants out of them.
The thing of it is, if he'd pressured his party to do everything the Democrats are asking and then some, he'd be cruising towards re-election now. This virus could have been the crisis that saved his administration and rewrote his place in the history books.
For all he talks about the media wanting him to fail, they have been DESPERATE for him to "pivot" and "grow into the role". And the Mild Moderate Middle has been just as desperate for something that they can recognize as normalcy.
All he had to do was lead on the virus, just a little bit, and mostly get out of the way, an he'd still have seniors, he'd have a *commanding* lead in white voters, and Joe Biden would be playing desperate catch-up.
He had a chance this year to completely change his image and instead he's saying "Give me the country first and then maybe I'll do something about the virus."
Remember he said after he wins then he'll start "negotiating" a third term? It's not going to get better if he sees that extortion works.
Multiple QTing the first tweet to say "Then we'll just vote him out and get it from the Dems."
Yeah, that's the next year part. His tweet said he'll pass a covid bill after he wins the election, with the implication that he won't pass one if he doesn't win, so we'll have to wait
To make it explicit: we *could*, if he is true to his word (ha!) have a stimulus bill in November if he wins. Otherwise, we're on our own until the Democrats take power.
Of course, that is assuming that he doesn't just hold onto power either way, but... while nothing about the future is set in stone... I imagine he feels a bit less sanguine about his chances there than he did before.
Which isn't to say he won't try.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Shirley Exception: Surely, there must be reasonable exceptions! Can we write those exceptions into law? No, because people will take advantage. But surely nobody would just let someone die!
The original Shirley Exception thread, which goes deeper into the concept.
The belief in a Shirley Exception is crucial to the self-image of most conservative voters, as is the belief that people will take advantage, if rights are spelled out.
The fear that someone, somewhere will take advantage and get something they don't need/deserve is the only "moral hazard" that really matters in US politics.
I think my favorite Dimension 20 sidequest might be... all of them. I honestly can't choose. They are each such different creatures.
I think there's really something to be said for the character design that goes into them.
The sidequest seasons are short, self-contained stories with characters who already have some levels in them (the first one was explicitly an epic level cmapaign) and history and characterization.
And obviously any RPG character is going to evolve through play but when you're planning on what amounts to an extended one-shot and you're doing it for an audience, I think that inspires the players to really go to the next level in bringing a fully-realized person to the stage.
So if you're not sure if an image you see going around with captions on it is real, the first thing to do is check if the video exists. These days a static screen shot of a current event won't exist if the video isn't around.
Honestly, if your first reaction to something is a feeling of "This can't be real." or "Someone please tell me this is fake."... be the someone. I mean, assuming everything fake is obnoxious and equally gullible in its own way. But check.
You should never be spreading something around with a comment like "Hope this is fake" or "This has to be fake. Doesn't it?" If you're already suspicious, check it out.
I want @billgreensmaine to know I just sent the Maine Democrats a very strongly worded donation to let them know that I am deeply concerned with their tactics.
Susan Collins is a GOP Senator who has tried to maintain an illusory distance from Trump by voicing nebulous "concerns" over the past four years, while consistently voting a party line. The Democrats apparently put up these signs to tie them together.
"He's an aspiring strongman, but he's on our side."
"It's true you can't trust him to keep his word on anything... that's why it's good that he's on our side. He'll be ruthlessly lying, double-dealing, and betraying people FOR US."