The @HouseJudiciary antitrust report is out, and it's jammed with recommendations that would fundamentally reshape the way the biz/tech/media economy works. judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
Lots of people reading it at this moment, so I'm going to focus on imagining a world in which certain recommendations take form in our lives.
Imagine a federally enforced "due process" by which a business that's been demoted or kicked off something like Amazon or Facebook could have their day in court.
Imagine that Google couldn't acquire a company unless it could definitively prove that doing so was in the public interest, and that it had to demonstrate that the acquisition wasn't just an end-run around developing the same business internally.
Imagine if news outlets were given permission to band together (currently forbidden under antitrust laws) and negotiate as a group with the big platforms for a cut of the money the platforms make off their reporting, rather than trying to negotiate piecemeal.
(This paragraph on the ways that big platforms tend to seep into all parts of whatever business they touch is very interesting, and leads to a call for structural separations and line of business limitations.)
("Structural separation" would presumably mean Amazon can't sell is own stuff against the merchants it hosts on its platform, just as Congress "enacted a provision to prohibit railroads from transporting any goods that they had produced or in which they held an interest.")
Imagine if you could participate in any social network from any other social network.
Someone help me with this one. Imagine companies can no longer make you buy one service in order to get access to another, ostensibly unrelated service. Is that the end of Amazon Prime, Google Play, Apple TV+?
Imagine the end of forced arbitration clauses, which the report concludes "tend to suppress valid claims and shield wrongdoing."
@threadreaderapp unroll please!
Facebook responds, in part, "we compete with a wide variety of services with millions, even billions, of people using them. Acquisitions are part of every industry, and just one way we innovate new technologies to deliver more value to people."
Amazon calls the report's recommendations "fringe," and argues that "far from enhancing competition, these uninformed notions would instead reduce it." blog.aboutamazon.com/policy/fringe-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jacob Ward

Jacob Ward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @byjacobward

30 Jun
Wow, @TheOfficialACM, THE powerhouse association for computer science, just called for a ban on public and private use of facial recognition. acm.org/binaries/conte…
Its technology policy committee writes "the technology too
often produces results demonstrating clear bias," which can do "profound injury" to "the fundamental rights of individuals in specific demographic groups, including some of the most vulnerable populations in our society."
The committee "urges an immediate suspension of the current and future private and governmental use of FR technologies in all circumstances known or reasonably foreseeable to be prejudicial to established human and legal rights."
Read 4 tweets
28 May
Here’s Trump’s Executive Order. The gist of it is that it tries to strip social media platforms of protection under Section 230(c) when they “edit” content with labels like Twitter did to Trump’s tweets today. kateklonick.com/wp-content/upl…
Specifically, the Executive Order...
…stipulates that any removal or restriction of content outside the scope of being lewd, violent, or otherwise objectionable disqualifies the platform in question from protection under Section 230 (c)...
…directs all departments and agencies to apply section 230 (c) only according to that interpretation...
Read 15 tweets
29 Oct 19
A report out today in Nature finds that we've been underestimating the effects of climate-change-related flooding, and that major cities across the globe will be inundated and essentially unlivable by 2050. nature.com/articles/s4146…
Bombay, Jakarta, Bangkok, some of the most densely populated cities in the world, literally filling with water at each high tide.
"Sea levels projected by 2050 are high enough to threaten land currently home to a total of 150 (140–170) million people to a future permanently below the high tide line." 150 MILLION PEOPLE.
Read 17 tweets
9 Oct 19
@CASottile spoke to the manager of a mobile home community in Sonoma this afternoon that will, alongside nearly a million Californians, have their power shut off by @PGE4Me at midnight.
The typical resident there is elderly, and he estimated half of them need refrigerated medications like insulin or powered devices like oxygen regulators to stay alive.
This afternoon someone from the utility cane and announced for the first time that all 290 homes would lose power.
Read 9 tweets
26 Sep 19
Facebook is the #1 platform for political disinformation, says a new Oxford study out today. “Are social media platforms really creating a space for...democracy? Or are they amplifying content that keeps citizens addicted, disinformed, and angry?” comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/upl…
The line between state-sponsored trolls, random citizens, and for-hire outfits is disappearing.
Just going ahead and making fake, emotionally satisfying content - the version of reality they know will hit home - is the preferred manipulation strategy.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jan 19
It is one of my greatest hopes as a journalist to get across a fundamental idea: your individual privacy is not the thing under greatest threat. (1/15)
Your privacy has been largely traded away already. It’s your individuality and autonomy within a system built on data that is really in danger, and really worth worrying about. (2/15)
I hear over and over again the words “privacy” and “data” uttered in the same sentence, as if they are interchangeable. “Your privacy” and “your data” are, in fact, two very different things. (3/15)
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!