The threats Facebook and Google made to Australia after that country attempted to regulate them come up in the Cicilline Report on big tech. Apparently @davidcicilline is unhappy when big tech monopolies threaten sovereign nations.
“It would be commercial suicide to be in Amazon’s crosshairs . . . If Amazon saw us criticizing, I have no doubt they would remove our access and destroy our business.”
- Anonymous partner of Amazon to the Antitrust Subcommittee
An attorney representing app developers said they “fear retaliation by Apple” and are “worried that their private communications are being monitored, so they won’t speak out against abusive and discriminatory behavior.”
"A former employee explained that as a product manager at Facebook “your only job is to get an extra minute. It’s immoral. They don’t ask where it’s coming from. They can monetize a minute of activity at a certain rate. So the only metric is getting another minute.”
Oof.
Finally we get reliable data on Facebook!
In December of 2019, the Facebook app had 200.3 million users in the United States, reaching 74% of smartphone users.
Whoa, a presentation done by Sheryl Sandberg on social networking: "The industry consolidates as it matures."
Facebook’s senior executives described the company’s mergers and acquisitions strategy in 2014 as a “land grab” to “shore up our position."
There are a lot of angry ex-Facebook employees. Here's one who told the subcommittee that it's just not very hard to split up Instagram and Facebook. It's essentially copying and pasting some code.
The Cicilline Report essentially says Zuckerberg lied about how important Facebook's investment in Instagram have been.
If the FTC can't bring an antitrust case against Facebook just lock the building and hand over the keys to the National Gallery across the street. At least if it were a museum it would offer the public some use.
Definitely seems like Google was the most openly dishonest of the four companies being investigated. Google said 'we don't have a dominant market share,' then refused to provide market share data, then said they don't even collect it, but of course, their docs show they do.
Some quality trolling in the footnotes. In response to Google being obnoxiously evasive about market share questions, the subcommittee noted 'interesting how Microsoft was obnoxiously evasive about market share.'
All done with Bluebook formatting.
Amazon calling the big tech report by the House Antitrust Subcommittee "fringe." @JayCarney is just a charmer isn't he?
"Public reporting suggests that, as of 2019, Google had increased the price of search ads by about 5% per year, exceeding the U.S. inflation rate at that time of 1.6%."
The Antitrust Subcommittee nailed Google for sticking Google Meet in your face every time you want to get onto a Zoom call. @benyt
This is interesting, Google ties its dominance in Maps to Google Cloud. To use Maps API keys you have to have a Google Cloud Platform account.
The subcommittee called out so many lies, misleading statements, and omissions from Google.
On to Amazon. This is... ooof.
"In response to the Committee’s request for “A list of the Company’s top ten competitors,” Amazon identified 1,700 companies, including Eero (a company Amazon owns), a discount surgical supply distributor, and a beef jerky company."
Spoke too soon on this one. The Cicilline report starts the section on Amazon noting the company may have committed perjury, so investigators don't trust the company's information.
Amazon's Kiva robotics acquisition was so obviously corrupt and anti-competitive, simply done to block competitors who sought to improve their warehousing operations.
So @davidcicilline throws so much shade at the enforcers. Here he is noting how both Obama and Trump enforcers had strong evidence on bad mergers but didn't bother to do anything.
"For most, if not all, of the acquisitions discussed in this Report, the FTC had advance notice of the deals, but did not attempt to block any of them."
That is some ugliness right there.
This is some bullshit resolution to what very much looked like perjury that Amazon lobbyist Nate Sutton offered about the abuse of third party merchant data to create private label products.
Roku couldn't buy advertise on Amazon for a keyword search of its own brand because it competes with something Amazon makes.
Whoa, the subcommittee found that Jeff Bezos misled the committee. Amazon does consider profitability when determining which merchant gets to place its products in front of consumers.
"For example, since Amazon opened a warehouse in Lexington County, South Carolina in 2011, the county has seen average annual wages for warehouse workers fall more than 30%, from $47,000 to $32,000 annually."
On and on and on.
This nugget is a big deal. One person speaking to the subcommittee had evidence Amazon's AWS was engaged in "cross-business data sharing." It's unclear what that means, but don't use AWS if you don't want Amazon to know your business.
There's some great analysis of anti-competitive tactics by Amazon Web Services in this report. A sort of mix between Microsoft tactics in the 1980s/1990s and Google's in the 2000s.
The remedies proposed by the Antitrust Committee report are rooted in its past work, such as the 1958 report on the airline industry and a 1957 report on the broadcast TV.
So much shade towards enforcers.
The Cicilline Report recommends implementing an Abuse of Dominance standard on a Federal level, which is what @SenGianaris's bill would do for New York.
More quality trolling in the footnotes. In this one the subcommittee staff goes after Frank Easterbrook and his ridiculous error framework for mergers.
"Meanwhile, both agencies have targeted their enforcement efforts on relatively small players—including ice skating teachers and organists—raising questions about their enforcement priorities."
Such trolling of enforcers. Love it.
The remedies are pretty strong: (1) legislative breakups (2) strengthen merger and monopolization law (3) reform enforcers and (4) restore the ability of private citizens to sue monopolists.
1. I'm reading Republican @RepKenBuck's leaked views on the big tech antitrust hearing, and it's quite a remarkable document. First, the Chicago School has lost the argument. Buck endorses the the fact there's a monopoly crisis.
"Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook have used...
2. "... their monopoly power to act as gatekeepers to the marketplace, undermine potential competition, and pick winners and losers, all while simultaneously cozying up to unfriendly nations like China in order to further expand their global footprint."
3. "Big Tech's titans, with a combined market cap nearing $5 trillion, have tipped the technology marketplace towards monopoly. These tech titans have used their dominant positions to hike fees, misappropriate third-party data, steal IP..."
People on both sides of the aisle think my plan to make Trump the King of Florida is dumb, juvenile, unconstitutional, and totally impractical.
If both sides dislike it I must be doing something right!
A friend working for a Florida legislator once took a phone call from a constituent angry about Obamacare. She tried to explain that he should talk to his member of Congress, that this was the Florida legislature. He screamed at her and insisted there was no such thing.
In Goliath I found that there was a massive speculative land bubble in the Florida town of Nettie in 1925, which collapsed when investors realized that the town didn't exist. Seriously make Trump the King of Florida.
Fascinating dynamic at this hearing on antitrust and big tech. You got three Brandeisians testifying, two moderate Dems, two big tech libertarians, and anti-monopoly conservative @rachelbovard.
Ugh, @Jim_Jordan is such a dumb blowhard. In a serious hearing about monopoly power he's continuing to allege that big tech promotes progressives and censors conservatives. Then goes after Dems for trying to "radically rewrite antitrust laws."
Every single Republican on this subcommittee is serious except @Jim_Jordan. Some of the Rs don't want to change the laws, some do. But no one is a clown like Jordan and his clown staffer Tyler Grimm.
Glad that @Austan_Goolsbee has noticed that market power and corporate monopolization is dangerous, and that the CARES Act radically contributed to the problem. nytimes.com/2020/09/30/bus…
Why are big companies swallowing the world? It's a *political story.* I published this in 2016 and it still holds up. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
I will say, I find the idea that we never resorted to aggressive competition policy during national crises, as @DanielDancrane asserts and @Austan_Goolsbee repeats, is not really true.
Follow-up to the giant big tech CEO grillings. Thursday is a hearing on how to re-write antitrust. I'm hearing that, once again, @Jim_Jordan is pushing for pro-big tech nonsense. Meanwhile @RepKenBuck is actually trying to fight monopolies. Split among Rs. wsj.com/articles/break…
So @Jim_Jordan tried and failed to sabotage the big tech CEO hearing a few months ago. He's relentlessly working on behalf of big tech.
Ok so @Jim_Jordan's witnesses for the Antitrust big tech hearing follow-up are Christopher Yoo and Tad Lipsky. Both are funded by Google, Facebook, and Qualcomm.
There are some good Republicans on that subcommittee but Jordan is owned by big tech. It's embarrassing.
It's hard to convey how lazy Dem reps are, but I will try.
"House Democrats who have been in hot pursuit of Mr. Trump’s tax returns most likely have no idea that at least some of the records are sitting in a congressional office building." nytimes.com/interactive/20…
"George Yin, a former chief of staff for the joint committee, said that any identifying information about taxpayers under review was tightly held among a handful of staff lawyers and was rarely shared with politicians assigned to the committee."