The whole concept of giving free content, quotes, interviews to legacy media corporations is obsolete.
It’s a habit. A bad habit. Break it. And if you have news to break, break it on your own channels: your Twitter, YouTube, podcast, or blog.
Don’t have a channel? Build one.
As every company becomes a media company, every citizen becomes a citizen journalist.
Want a quote from @elonmusk? Check his feed like everyone else. Everyone gets access to the same info at the same time.
The old model of PR was propitiating legacy media corporations.
The new model is to build your own serious media arm.
Learn to code. Then learn to write, report, publish, direct.
Start with a blog, graduate to a YouTube TV channel. Or something like Stripe Press. Be creative.
Decentralize your PR.
Rather than spending $100k on the next PR person, why not give ten $10k fellowships to up-and-coming influencers around the world who’ve demonstrated interest in your area?
Like Nike sponsoring athletes, sponsor creators with proven talent in your field.
One way to bootstrap your new company’s media arm is to start with a founding influencer — or recruit one early on.
Then grow this into something more professional over time.
Btw, many PR people will adapt or already have. @smc90 was one of the first to do first party original content for tech, and helped build the a16z podcast into a real source of tech news.
I think we’ll see much more of that. Editors-in-chief, not VP Comms. Be the media.
Consulting (v1): open source the code, sell consulting
Cloud (v2): open source some code, but sell a closed source cloud complement
Community (v3): open source all code, and issue a token or charge for access to the community
The consulting model didn't scale because you had to keep finding great engineers and selling their time by the hour. Hard to do that endlessly.
The community model does scale because essentially each community member is buying time from each other. You're just the moderator.
Thesis: many SaaS companies will eventually issue a karma token (or be outcompeted by one that does). They set up a developer marketplace / StackOverflow equivalent where experts earn and charge crypto karma for advice. Would work for Figma, Mixpanel, etc.
- It's recent (note the mention of Game of Thrones), yet immediately archaic
- It has zero reference to math, physics, technology texts
- It ignores the descent of many formerly "high" institutions into clickbait
You can't get away from ranking. Otherwise Google wouldn't exist. But this exercise shows these ranks to be very much in flux, with important actors left completely off the map, as well as any acknowledgment of how much individual *disagreement* there would be about ranks.
Boston Dynamics seems to have raised only $37M. They will be at $35M in revenue if they can sell even 500 Spots at $75k a unit.
Security patrol seems like the application that can justify the expense. Basically a mobile security camera with a whoa factor.
If you look at most tweets, people are scared of this thing. Of course they would be! It’s headless and moves kinda weird. Classic uncanny valley.
But a degree of fear is the property many want in a guard dog, like a Doberman or Rottweiler. So security seems like the use case.
If these price points are real, Boston Dynamics has a shot at completely owning the guard dogs market.
There are many ways in which robot dogs are better than live dogs for this specific purpose. Unkillable, remote controllable, networked, equipped with video & microphone, etc.
How many academic citations can we replace with import statements?
If we take reproducible research in the sciences seriously, the paper is a human-readable adjunct to the code and data.
The main conclusions of many scientific papers should be expressible as equations, API calls, or entries in a probabilistic knowledge graph (“A binds to B”).
In the same way that good code can be often used without reading the manual, a good scientific paper can often be boiled down to a few key assertions.
CS is the most obvious place to start. Each journal a code repository, each paper a library?