Let me explain why autistic people may perform better with robots. It’s not their “Easy to read” social cues, it’s because they’re honest and predictable. They aren’t going to give an exasperated sigh or treat us like we’ve verbally assaulted them by expressing a need (cont)
They’re not going to call us into the office and tell us they have “concerns” because they misinterpreted our responses. We aren’t going to find after six months of mistreatment that someone has been harboring a grudge because they misunderstood OUR subtext. (Cont)
They won’t assemble in groups in the break room and stop talking when we walk in. They aren’t going to think we are angry at them if we don’t wrap every instruction up in platitudes or remind them they’re a good person if we need to ask them to do something differently. (Cont)
They’re not going to need us to remember to ask about their kids’ little league game, their neighbor’s mission trip, and to compliment them on something arbitrary in order to verify we didn’t start disliking them. (Cont)
They won’t think our tone and affect are communicating something that is the opposite of what we intend. Robots don’t perceive class, racial, or academic hierarchies or assign us to the lowest rung. Robots assume interaction is purposeful. (Cont)
Robots won’t entangle us in workplace gossip. They won’t think that declining an invite means that we hate them. They won’t get a “vibe” from us, hit on us, believe we are “creepy,” or project their biases onto us. (Cont)
They won’t say things like “kids these days” to see if we are going to commiserate with them about how “urban” the area has become to see how racist we can be while maintaining plausible deniability. (Cont)
Robots aren’t going to talk about how “blessed” their day has been in order to confirm that we share their religious beliefs, attempt to convert us, or see us as dangerous if we have different-- or no-- religious beliefs. (cont)
They won't think that questions are a Darwinian or existential challenge and will accurately interpret them as an attempt to gain information. (cont)
Robots, despite what they are programmed to do, are not going to see us as perpetually in need of intervention, compliment us on how "normal" we are, or filter their every interaction with us through their (debauched) perception of our differences. (Cont)
Robots don't show up slathered in obnoxious perfume that excoriates the olfactory nerve or cackle at ear-piercing decibles. (cont)
Robots don't get to assume the moral, expert, or sympathetic advantage in every situation by default of being in a majority group. (Cont)
Robots do work at the workplace because that is the alleged reason for their position in the workplace.
Robots don't evaluate our degree of professionalism by our hairstyle, makeup, clothes, or shoes. They don't care if we are attractive or not, don't have unwarranted advice, and don't struggle to gain or maintain power imbalances.
It's actually baffling that the combined efforts of so many ivy league universities would not lead them to the obvious conclusion that that removing biases, privilege hierarchies, and barriers to performance is more inherent to an autistic approach to the workplace. (cont)
Perhaps the biggest irony is that no one assumes the problem is with the employers if the autistic people do just fine with clear directions from a nonthreatening source whose only objective is safe and efficient task completion. (Cont)
Maybe the key to inclusion & equity is to apologize for the trauma autistics have been subjected to by having our needs for accommodations treated like special snowflake syndrome & every social interaction to be a gamble that may result in further disenfranchisement. (cont)
Maybe even stop treating workplace culture like a hostage situation for autistics and start paying people and promoting them based on objective measures that do not involve personality contests as a metric.
Maybe think about how robots never believe you, trust you, or respect you more because you demonstrate the right amount of charisma, eye contact, and performative empathy.
Maybe just ask what an autistic individual needs in order to be able to love doing their job and start there; because if they love it, then they'll do it with passion and dedication-- except then you'll penalize or exploit them for being too passionate.
Autistic people are not the reason autistics are unemployed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I assure you that our ability to tolerate suffering is monastic already and that your testing of our patience is already a Sisyphean marathon you can’t fathom. Maybe the reason we are underemployed is because your nonsense is a parody straight out of Swift’s Laputa.
To be autistic is to be the narrator in Gulliver’s Travels. There are not enough words to express how abjectly fucked this is. You want us to act like human beings? Start with treating us that way.
Today is day three of Suicide Prevention Week, and we are continuing the #NoDejahVu campaign by posting daily with articles and social media posts focused on suicide prevention. We need you to help! (cont)
Of all the factors related to suicide, no lists suggest that "being loved, embraced, respected, and accepted" contributes. Being dismissive, embarrassed, or judgemental of people's personal truth and way of existing, their very identity, devastates them. (cont)
Lack of acceptance contributes to why so many LGBTQ+ youth consider, attempt to, or do end their own lives. Teachers, parents, friends, classmates, grandparents-- respect & accept those in your life for where and who they are.
This is a thing about being autistic. NeuroClastic had an article about 50 ways society gaslights autistics. I experienced a different one yesterday, but it's happened to me a lot. This is informational for allies and an #AskingAutistics and #NeuroLurkers to see if others relate.
I was doing something internal, and it was glorious. I mean, I doubt most people's brains work this way, but I really don't know. I was totally in my mind, oblivious to the world around me, rearranging all these moving parts visually in my head. I see my thoughts. (cont)
I can explain it best by saying that it's like dreaming in that I'm not seeing it with my eyes, and the things I "see" are like a coded language. I can use this "system" to bring thousands of disconnected things to working memory and arrange them to make sense of them. (cont)
I have the forensic reports from the accident Matthew Rushin had. I have transcripts from body cams now. Here is what really happened. On January 4, 2019, Matthew was going to Panera Bread to get pastries. And to see his girlfriend who worked there. This was a routine for him.
As he is pulling in, a man at a stop sign begins to pull out. Matthew had the right of way. Their front left bumpers graze each other. Matthew maintained the entire time that the other man hit him. Police continue to say “the man you hit,” and Matthew continues to correct them.
“No, he hit me.” Matthew pulls off to the side and waits. And waits. The man is illegally sitting in an intersection. For minor accidents, people are supposed to move out of traffic. The man would not move. Matthew tries to prompt the man to get out of the intersection.
Our community is really broken. It's a cruel place. I thought if I named this site what I did and reidentified the name, equated it as a synonym of autism, then it would do something to reverse the bullying and unnecessary division. It hasn't. I mean, it's accomplished a lot.
But I thought if people saw that we were this great, inclusive publication, they'd see the merit of the approach and also how much of our community was out there with no safety net and no "community." Autism groups ran by non-autistics can get 100k+ people. Ours rarely get 10k
No matter what I do with the site name, it's going to disappoint a ton of people. But right now, it's meaning that a lot of people are constantly being stressed and pulled into defending us against charges of fascism and white supremacy and a hierarchy of ableism.
Dear parents, teachers, & employers of autistics. Today, I'm celebrating that my child ate half a yogurt and 3/4 of a PB&J for breakfast. She used a spoon for the yogurt and made it half way through before getting a bit upset because she spilled a lot & was getting overwhelmed.
Before, a PB and J would've been a no-go. She wouldn't eat anything with more than one visible ingredient. She will eat cheese (alone), or bread (alone), but never both at the same time. She's sometimes eat peanut butter on a spoon because it doesn't spill off.
This didn't just happen. This was the result of three years of trying different things, of eating tons of pureed food in pouches, and of grand efforts that were futile in execution. But not once was there force, punishment, or shaming. Just low-demand encouragement.