(1/bot) Let's educated @rahulkanwal, @Chaiti a twitter bot is a s/w ac tht runs on twitter API to perform actions autonomously like your group does. #302ForSSRDishaKillers
(2/bot) @thewire_in refers @HindustanTimes quoting 80k fake accounts but there is no mention by meme police about the validity of the numbers in question and to top fake a/c and bots are 2 different topics. Let's not fool us.
(3/bot) As per meme police cyber unit, they have compiled a report wherein, they found hastags relating to SSR being used by foreign countries in foreign languages.
Funny looks, in technical terms we call them spammers.
They should understand the diff. #302ForSSRDishaKillers
(4/bot) As Parambir Singh, cyber cell is conducting a thorough investigation and says law will be prosecuted under IT act.
But, how would Parambir Singh prosecute foreigners because IT act applies only to India?
Will @HindustanTimes explain us?
(5/bot) Anyone irrespective of valid email id can signup @Twitter with a unique user name. Valid email id and phone number is not a mandate.
Differentiating a fake twitter acc. with a valid acc. becomes quite ambiguous.
(6/bot) For bots, @TwitterAPI allows to run a paid campaign to promote themselves or business or any agenda. They need to pay $ for running a campaign.
(7/bot) Not only in @Twitter but also in @facebookapp there is an option to create a lookalike profiles and target a audience for promoting a campaign. For campaigns that runs in social media #MarkZuckerberg was once asked to testify with US congress. #302ForSSRDishaKillers
(8/bot) seems this so called foreign university student understood not all are fools with a sting of greeting and harbouring attention for his foolish thesis he might be working on.
(8/bot) @SKR12999937 has compiled a audit report that states no tweet has been done from these Fake followers. They usually run autonomously to hit likes, RT and reply on his tweet simultaneously.
For all Rahul of the world's @RahulEaswar@rahulkanwal FYI
(10/bot) Meme police are worried about about their reputations based on the TH used by foreigners for SSR campaigns, but these spammers who are tweeting with SSR campaigns doesn't hold valid as per see. Are they saying they will file a defamation u/s 400? #302ForSSRDishaKillers
*499/500
(11/bot) But if someone from enrich me if 499/500 comes under IT act? Or it's just a bogus claim.
Well under article 9, every individual has the right to exercise freedom of expression unless it incites communal tension n hate against India
(12/bot) As per the IT Act 2008 u/s 69 allows Indian authority to monitor and do surveillance and also blocking data trafficking so sometimes we unnecessarily get harassed by these laws, it also put a big question on our data privacy.
(13/bot) u/s 43 A, we have our rights to protect our personal data and govt has to ensure no data is violated or misused.
In US they hv strong laws on Cam-Spam n EU they have signed double-opt-in, but do we have any such law that protects our privacy? #302ForSSRDishaKillers
(14/bot) @Memeghnad thinks wearing a spec can beat a microscope 🤖microphobic alert ⚠️
(4/s) A writ petition was filed by human activist in HC and the case was handed to CBI in 1993.
Inn1996, CBI submitted a final report and said can't establish suicide or murder.
The same drama is going on now with Sushant's murder.
(5/s) report was not acceptable so a 2nd CBI team was formed, which concluded the case as homicide, but couldn't establish the predators, court rejected the report again and a third CBI team was formed. It was said medical report was influenced.
(6/s) inquest report didn't disclosed injuries on body, material evidences destroyed, cloths not subjected for forensics, photos showing injuries removed and scene of crime contaminated.
In 1992, 19 yrs old sister Abhaya’s body was recovered from well, 62 nuns frm Abhaya’s congregation petitioned to CM as consequence investigation was handed over to crime branch. As in Sushant's, Abhaya’s mystery (suicide)
(2/s) An inquest report was submitted, death due to drowning, but, later all material evidences were destroyed but didn't ruled out homicide because of injury in head.
Sushant's ligature mark also points towards homicide can't be overruled.
(3/s) The crime branch concluded Abhaya had committed suicide according to PM report she died due to drowning, they filed a closure report and destroyed evidence.
Sushant's evidence were destroyed with forged PM report without time of death.
@Krushna_KAS to @KapilSharmaK9 waise hi paisa ke liye sab celebs ka Puja karte Hai, @apshaha ka daily mazzak banate hai. Aapna kya jata Hai boss paisa De rha hai, bakwass krte Hai.
Bol, surgery v karwa lu? New script for @Tksshowofficial@SonyTV.
Public sentiments ka kya value? 0