1/ The way Facebook is handling this QAnon ban is alarming and deceitful.

So, FB announced a ban on QAnon yesterday. *After* announcement, they began telling reporters that it would take a few weeks to implement.

Yikes. Don't get fooled. Here's why that is deceptive and bad...
2/ By announcing the ban, but not being able to fully enforce it nearly immediately, what Facebook is doing is giving the QAnon community an opportunity to do two things: a) adapt/modify their pages to avoid ban; and, b) transition to other platforms w/out.
3/ But it gets worse. There is actually no reason at all for the lagging enforcement.

Back in August, Facebook banned *violent* QAnon communities - a subset of QAnon. During that action, they already largely compiled and identified the Q communities to assess for violence.
4/ FB didn't even effectively enforce this policy. We identified dozens of QAnon groups that violated FB's explicitly calls for violence exception; FB ultimately removed them (after they were flagged and some nudging).

But the larger point here is that: they already had the list
5/ Put another way, before they announced this ban, Facebook already ha QAnon universe mapped out. There is no reason at all for the lag time in removing the accounts nor is there a reason why FB is still recommending the content. Their "we need a few weeks" line doesn't stand up
6/ FB put this announcement out now in hopes of getting positive publicity and storyline that they are taking action.

But it's not just a hollow publicity stunt. Recognize: the way FB is approaching this is actually helping QAnon community avoid effects of deplatforming.
7/ A lot of the headlines are focusing on FB's ban of QAnon. And, indeed, I understand why. But I think that's only part of story given how they are handling.

I think the more accurate headline is: Facebook Helps QAnon Avoid Effects of Upcoming Ban.
8/ Tldr: First, Facebook help QAnon metastasize by ignoring it and actually promoting the growth of QAnon communities (100%+ since April, most growth coming from FB recommendations). They're now tiptoeing their way to enforcement giving QAnon a chance to adapt and avoid.
9/ Let's be careful not to get fooled by FB's public relations.

If this was some brand new thing, I could understand a rationale for needing some time to enforce it. But frankly, that's just not the issue here at all. And anything less than full enforcement by them is bs.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angelo Carusone

Angelo Carusone Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GoAngelo

4 Oct
1/ Sorry. Nice words here. But Zeke's predecessors and the WHCA as an institution, from Trump's firsts day in office failed to fight to preserve this access - and worse often actively enabled Trump undermining it.
2/ When Trump started to boot some outlets from briefings, instead of emphasizing solidarity and nipping it in the bud; they basically ignored it.
3/ The WHCA literally put out statements at one point heralding Trump as the "most accessible" president ever. Not only was the statement absurd, but also false.
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
1/ Fox News and masks, a thread:

Laura Ingraham: "They'll say this whole mask thing is 'settled science' just like they do with climate change, of course it is not and they know it."
2/ Laura Ingraham: "The science behind the mask mandates is shaky and that is putting it charitably”"
3/ Tucker Carlson: "This is what happens when science intersects with politics. Both lose, and the country loses most of all. [...] forcing everyone to wear a mask when there is no evidence that helps"
Read 7 tweets
1 Oct
1/ Okay. So, I'm seeing some media outlets/reporters using the term "fraternity" to describe the Proud Boys. You definitely should not do this. Not only because it's wrong and doesn't accurately reflect the awfulness of them, but also cuz that term has a specific meaning among PB
2/ The Proud Boys have subgroup called "Fraternal Order of the Alt Knights." The FOAK describe themselves as the "tactical defense" operation of the PBs. But, what they really do is explicitly use violence and antagonizing others so they have to "defend" themselves as a tactic
3/ So for example, at Charlottesville's Unite The Right event, the Fraternal Order of the Alt Knights were very active. This is not the only thing they've engaged in where they have helped stoke chaos.
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
1/ 5 years ago, I used to go on and on about how Trump subscribed to the 10% theory.

What you are seeing and what you saw last night is a perfect illustration of that.

He's not trying to win the election. He's trying to win the fight *after* the election.
2/ The 10% theory was this super revisionist history that started percolating in right-wing media right after Obama came into office. It basically says that all you need is a fervent 10% of population and with that you can either bully others into support or silence.
3/ Right-wing media fed this notion to themselves for years. And, they attributed most major historical events to the the 10% theory - American revolution, Civil War, etc..etc..
Read 7 tweets
3 Sep
1/ Apropos Facebook banning new political ads 1 week before election:

This is a window-dressing that is designed to fool media and the public into thinking Facebook is taking disinfo seriously. It is a genuinely pointless policy - and if anything will be do more harm than good.
2/ For starters, of all the disinformation and extremism problems on Facebook, political ads are bottom of list. Facebook’s signal boosting right-wingers and lax policy enforcement much bigger issue.

It was’t FB ads that brought the Kenosha killer to Wisconsin.
3/ The loopholes are just nuts. Zuckerberg warns of unrest. And so, he bans new political ads...but only 1 week before election? What about all the other weeks before when voting till place remotely or what about the week after election?

The time period is laughably short.
Read 5 tweets
19 Aug
1/ Yes, it is good for FB to take the action against QAnon groups. But a few things:

1) It has already metastized. Too late to contain now.

2) FB let this thing grow unchecked.

3) Remember: Other tech companies cracked down way months ago - Roku, Apple, Eventbrite.
2/ Oh and don’t get me started on pandering to right-wing.

They can’t crack down against QAnon alone. Facebook has to pair it with a crackdown on anti-fascist pages. So FB is pro-fascism?

What they shoulda done was crack down on the really far out there anti-vax communities.
3/ This is important too: In the past when Facebook has done this, they put out these numbers of pages affected.

The last time they did a big fake news crack down, they also lumped in police accountability pages. Disproportionately hit those pages.

I fear you’ll see that here.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!