People might be underestimating the Lincoln Project thing because of misunderstanding how messaging campaigns build over time. Ppl thought Occupy Wall Street was a failure b/c it didn't immediately change things, but it was an important moment in a trajectory 1/
OWS left a legacy of activists and a politically effective language for keeping inequality in the public mind (the 99% vs the 1%). Lincoln Project is different but it has some dedicated and well funded people working on messaging that might ultimately find an audience 2/
When I talk to my students, I hear a lot of disappointment and anger with the choices they've been given. Many are conservatives who dislike Trump but are unimpressed with Biden for various reasons. I doubt most of them have heard of the LP yet... 3/
But I wouldn't be surprised to see LP-like campus groups pop up if Biden wins. The immediate future for R's is more Trumpism regardless of election results. But cons who have been cast out of the R party have nowhere to go b/c the left D faction is fairly powerful and... 4/
Increasingly so at the local level, even more--I'm guessing--in campus party orgs. So in short there's a significant group of motivated conservative ppl out there with access to money and powerful networks who are politically homeless for now. I doubt that can last for long.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ANIMAL ENERGY, a THREAD on the surprising history of industrial capitalism's core and periphery:
You'd think animals are a primitive power source quickly discarded once fossil fuels entered the picture. But you'd be wrong. Animal power concentrated in the 19c industrial core.
As Clay McShane showed long ago, urban growth in the US Northeast was fundamentally dependent on horses. Look at these incredible population figures. Even as rural migrants and int'l immigrants streamed into Boston, it's horse population grew even faster. jstor.org/stable/3185479
Horsepower increased on the intensive margin, too, as horses got much bigger. Look at the size of these enormous draft horses! Urban horses pulled streetcars and delivery wagons. Rural horses plowed fields and did other farm work. nj.com/bergen/2018/05…
Thread: 1/For folks interested in 19c US history of capitalism and pol econ, I cannot recommend enough @yuenyuenang's How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. It offers fresh thinking for reflecting on the US case. This thread raises one implication I took from the book @pseudoerasmus
2/The final chapter makes its own comparison to the 19c US, drawing on Wallis's work on public finance w/the "open access" framework he developed with North and Weingast and recently elaborates in an ed. volume with Lamoreaux. This is fine, but there's much more one could do
3/In ch. 4 Ang gives a fascinating account of how Chinese top leaders rewrote the rules for bureaucratic pay & promotion to focus on economic deliverables without micromanaging local methods. The result was a swarm of bureaucratic entrepreneurialism using personal social networks