1/ #Rewildingscience with rewilding as a new framework in management by P. Jepson (2016)
-People can experience ‘ecological boredom’ and show indifference to wildlife issues⬇️
-Rewilding embraces change around current management and reinvigorates 21st century #conservation⬆️
2/ Since ~2008 the number of rewilding articles has shown a sharp incline, highlighting the growing interest in this ‘radical’ form of ecological management. This challenges existing conservation frameworks…
3/ Conservation frames are shaped by scientific technologies, media, management practices and legislative practices. This dictates how we manage the environment. Rewilding could be introduced as a new frame, opening up debate on how nature ‘management’ should be approached
4/ rewilding as a concept represents a functionally different paradigm to the institutional (or compositionalist) framework that is being used in Europe; restoration vs preservation, static vs dynamic, direct management vs passive management etc
#rewilding can therefore highlight a new, exciting, and forward thinking way of tackling our current biodiversity and climate issues. Follow this link to read the paper in full : onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.11…
Today in #rewildingscience: Avian winners & losers of rural land abandonment (Regos et al 2016)
The study found
-An overall positive effect on biodiversity ⬆️
-13 shrubland & forest bird species showed an increase ⬆️
-4 ecotone & open-habitat species showed a negative trend ⬇️
The study analysed remotely sensed data-derived maps in combination with bird census data carried out in 2000 and 2010 at both landscape and census plot scale. 2/9
They found a gradient of change from bare ground and open shrubland to closed shrubland and woodland. With closed shrubland increasing by 17% and evergreen and deciduous forest increasing by 14% and 107%. While bare ground decreased by 85% 3/9
1/ Today we take a look at the key points from Arts, Fischer, & René van der Wal (2016) examination of the relationship between rewilding and reintroductions. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/re…
Critically review the assumption that reintroductions automatically restore wild places.
by
investigating the relatedness of key concepts – ecological functioning, wilderness experience and natural autonomy in relation to a hypothetical wolf reintroduction
3/ Results
The paper determined that:
Each concept was positively impacted by a wolf reintroduction
However...
The concepts often collide rather than enforce each other
1/ A debate on the approach of management and the distinction between anthropogenic and ‘natural’ landscapes is the topic of #rewildingscience today. This centres around the use of fire in peatland management and how we approach ecosystem understanding
2/ The use of fire in peatland & heaths is steeped in political, social, and economic debate. Whilst it is difficult and, in some cases, inadvisable to tease-out these points from habitat management, it is important to conduct unbiased ecological assessments for certain practices
3/ Here, the authors aim to examine the trade-offs in land-management within peatlands/heaths. “choosing the ‘right’ ecosystem is difficult…in a landscape with a long history of human influence”. Whether that be #rewilding or a combination of practices is still being discussed
1/ A glimpse into Pleistocene park for todays #rewildingscience tweet thread with the article “Born to #Rewild” by Eli Klintisch. This short article delves into the process and thoughts behind the attempts to re-establish the grassland-dominated ecosystem – the mammoth steppe
2/ In the mid-90s, Sergey Zimov founded the Pleistocene park, a 14,000-hectare reserve near Chersky. The intention was to test whether large herbivores, such as, elk moose, reindeer, horses and bison – through grazing - could bring back the mammoth steppe landscape
3/ This biome dominated Northern Eurasia and North America for 2m years until the last glacial around 13,000 years ago when it shifted to mossy tundra. Why Zimov felt the need to re-establish this landscape lies in its carbon-trapping properties
1/ We’ve broken with tradition a little today. After last week’s paper ‘Rethinking Rewilding’ got a positive reaction, this week we’re covering a response to that paper by Prior and Ward (2016) #rewilding#rewildingscience
2/ Rather than go over last week again, you can check out last weeks thread here
3/ Prior and Ward start by welcoming Jorgensen’s paper and emphasise their belief that the emergence of rewilding within both conservation and popular discourse means that social scientists and humanities scholar have a vital role to play in these debates.
2/ The author starts by pointing out that the term rewilding has not come from nowhere and that ‘Wilderness’ as a conservation target, particularly in the US, has a long history.
3/ The Wilderness Act in 1964 defined it as ‘an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man’, yet wilderness was also a ‘resource’ for human use.