1/ One of Russiagate's biggest conspiracy theories is that Konstantin Kilimnik is a Russian spy who shared sensitive Trump polling data w/ Russia.
This interview by @JakeTapper of ex-Trump aide Rick Gates destroys these claims & displays the media malpractice that spread them:
2/ re: spy claim, Gates notes Kilimnik was "a high-value asset" of the US, but Mueller/Senate excluded evidence of this. (see e.g. realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…)
Gates also poses a simple Q that most journalists, including @JakeTapper, have not re: spy claim: "Where’s the evidence?"
3/ Gates then debunks notion that KK got sensitive polling data: "it was called top-line data. That is simply that it has Trump 50 percent, Clinton 48 percent... It was a combination of some internal polling on specific states, as well as a lot of public data that was shared."
4/ Gates adds another insight that @jaketapper & countless others should ponder: “Let's make sure we have all the facts before jumping to conclusions, which is exactly what they did with the Mueller investigation & the idea that there was Russia collusion w/ the Trump campaign."
5/ BTW, in prior clip @jaketapper makes an error. Trump team actually cooperated w/ Mueller: after all, WH counsel Don McGahn was Mueller's star witness. WH didn’t refuse an interview: they challenged Mueller to convince a judge why one was justified, given Mueller had no crime.
6/ Rick Gates also destroys the recently fashionable conspiracy theory that Roger Stone told Trump about DNC hack in mid-2016. Gates said this came from Mueller team asking "speculative questions" & using them to "cherry-pick" info.
7/ The significance of Gates saying all this needs to underscored: it was his witness testimony that was used by Mueller & Senate & countless media stenographers to push the polling data and "Roger Stone told Trump" conspiracy theories. He's telling you it's bullshit.
8/ Note how @jaketapper gets indignant when Gates says there's no evidence that Kilimnik is a Russian spy & a lot of evidence that he isn't one. That's because Russiagate journalism is basically fan fiction, and anything that challenges the narrative is greeted w/ hostility.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I always thought the Alfa Bank-Trump story was just another dumb Trump-Russia conspiracy theory fed to credulous media stenographers, but now it looks much worse: read between the lines, & it looks like a criminal set-up. Durham is investigating it. newyorker.com/news/news-desk…
The story never made sense. A group of "self-appointed guardians of the Internet" (-The New Yorker, sincerely 😂) discover some suspicious activity between a Trump server and Russia's Alfa Bank.
An Alfa suit now alleges this was actually a criminal set-up:
Idea that this was a set-up makes total sense. Which sounds more plausible:
A) "self-appointed guardians of the Internet" discover secret communications between Trump & Russian bank server
B) It was deliberate fraud to fake a Trump-Russia tie. And it would be far from alone.
.@democracynow has ignored the OPCW scandal for over a year. This attempt to acknowledge it has several errors, starting w/ the title: it isn’t the “U.N.” that blocked the testimony: it’s the countries that bombed that Syria — US/UK/France — that blocked the testimony at the UN.
.@democracynow then misreports the scandal as: "leaked documents show two OPCW investigators have questioned the official findings."
No, the leaks show the OPCW team found evidence that Syria had not committed a chemical attack, but were censored & sidelined (under US pressure)
.@democracynow has made a visible editorial shift on Syria, excluding voices that challenge the pro-proxy war narrative. That's partly why DN last had on Stephen Cohen in April 2017. And that's why even when they finally acknowledge the OPCW scandal, they still get it wrong.
Incredible scene unfolding at UN Security Council: US, UK & allies are trying to *block* the testimony of OPCW's first Director General, Jose Bustani, who has expressed concerns about the Douma cover-up scandal & support for the whistleblowers. Here's UK's @AmbassadorAllen:
OPCW's Douma scandal directly implicates US, UK & France. They bombed Syria in April 2018 over chemical weapons allegations against Syrian gov't in Douma. OPCW inspectors who investigated in Douma later had their evidence suppressed -- under US pressure. thenation.com/article/world/…
The attempt by @AmbassadorAllen & allies to censor Jose Bustani is a transparent display that they want to censor any dissenting point of view -- even from a distinguished speaker such as the OPCW's first director.
I continue to hope that media outlets that have ignored the OPCW scandal will finally cover it. In particular, I hope @democracynow & @TheIntercept -- which claim to be committed to defending whistleblowers & challenging power -- will end their involvement in the media blockade.
The silence around this story is unlike anything I've ever seen. It exposes fraudulent behavior, under US government pressure, to lodge allegations against Syria that happened to justify a US-led bombing of Syria. How can a US media outlet ignore it? Anyone remember Iraq?
@joshrogin@joshua_landis Josh, it's incredible that you to try to lecture about Syria when you are an open supporter of the proxy war that caused the atrocities. Luckily there are other Americans more aware of the facts, or more willing to acknowledge them. Listen to Joe Biden:
@joshrogin@joshua_landis Biden: "Our allies were our largest problem in Syria... They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad. Except that the people who were being supplied were... Al-Qaeda & the extremist elements of jihadis..."
@joshrogin@joshua_landis This is what you want us to support. No thanks, I'm not an Al-Qaeda fan. I guess you are?
Professional Sadist @Charles_Lister -- who has spent years lobbying for US, Saudi & others to wage a murderous proxy war in Syria, & then impose murderous sanctions when they lost -- can't challenge Professor Landis on the facts. So he resorts to smears. Truly shameful:
The Grayzone article @Charles_Lister calls "deeply misleading" is based on leaked UK gov't docs detailing a massive Western-funded propaganda effort to whitewash its proxy war in Syria & jihadist groups that benefited. Lister can't challenge a single fact: thegrayzone.com/2020/09/23/syr…
Beyond fact that Grazyzone challenges the murderous Syria proxy war & sanctions that Gulf regimes pay @Charles_Lister to shill for, I assume he also resents that we've exposed things like him actively promoting ISIS' most prominent recruiter on Twitter: thegrayzone.com/2018/10/29/sha…