Folks who are worried about a 25th Amendment coup against Trump should read the 25th Amendment.
It's short, and most of it can be passed over. Section One deals with the removal of the president from office by impeachment and conviction, death, or resignation. Not relevant here. Section Two deals with the replacement of the veep. Also skippable.
Section Three talks about how the President can go about VOLUNTARILY AND TEMPORARILY turning the powers of his or her office over to the Vice President. Voluntarily. Temporarily. His call.
Section Four is the part that deals with the stripping of the Presidents powers when "the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office," but doesn't voluntarily step aside. But wait! What does it say?
It says that the President can only be sidelined by the Vice President and the majority of the cabinet, and THEN only until the President declares that he or she is fit to resume his or her duties.
(At that point, the veep and cabinet can issue another declaration, and send it to Congress to resolve. But still, the call remains with the Vice President and the cabinet.)
I have no idea what Pelosi is planning, but unless she's got Pence on board, it's not a removal of Trump from office.
Ah, here we are. I didn't discuss this above, for reasons I'll get to in a sec, but Section Four provides that Congress can establish an alternate path for invoking the 25th.
What Pelosi's gonna do tomorrow is announce proposed legislation for the creation of such an alternate path. But that proposal has no practical significance, for two reasons. Image
First, you can't pass legislation without passing it through the Senate, and Mitch McConnell isn't gonna consider any 25th Amendment legislation Pelosi proposes. (And Trump would veto anything passed by the new Senate in January.)
(This is why I didn't mention the legislation angle in the original thread.)
Second, even if such legislation were in place now, it wouldn't have any practical effect on Trump's power. Because if he were declared incompetent, all he'd have to so is sign a piece of paper that said "am not," and he'd get his powers back.
That would trigger a Congressional vote on his fitness, but you'd need 2/3 of both the House and the Senate to declare him unfit—and that's in the Constitution, not subject to alteration through legislation.
So this is a messaging bill—can't pass the Senate, may not even be brought up for a vote in the House. Not necessarily BAD messaging, but not an actual attempt to remove Trump from office, despite Trump's eleventy-seven tweets to the contrary this afternoon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

10 Oct
I don't understand this impulse. It's not like there are a bunch of Good Militias out there whose name is being sullied by the association of "militia" with white supremacist domestic terrorism. Why not call them militias?
They call themselves militias. the public understands them as militias. Seems to me "militias are bad" is a much simpler project than "militias are good, actually, but something completely different than every militia you've ever heard of."
(And if that project puts a little more stink on the public perception of The Second Amendment As Currently Construed By The GOP ... oh well.)
Read 13 tweets
9 Oct
This is actually a great article about rich jerks who want to escape from society because they have no idea what society actually is or how being a part of it works. nytimes.com/2020/10/09/rea…
"I want to buy an island that's a zillion miles from anything but also has all the amenities I'm used to at the tips of my fingers. And no climate change."
"I'd like to escape from everything forever, but I'm not willing to quarantine in a luxury hotel for two weeks to make it happen."
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
A thought experiment on "eradicating Trumpism" for wistful Republicans: Is there a scenario in which Trump is alive and not imprisoned in which he is not a speaker at the 2024 Republican National Convention?
I just don't see a mechanism by which Trump is so decisively repudiated that his supporters don't remain an essential component of the GOP base. When he (eventually) dies, that problem can be papered over. But not until.
To put it another way, a LOT of elected Republicans tried to tank the 2016 election after Access Hollywood. They were 100% ready to take the L, put Trump in the trash, and regroup to beat Hillary in 2020. But their base wouldn't let them.
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
Biden's got the Duke of Earl. This thing is over.
(One of the most thrilling live recordings ever, IMO:)
The Boomers for Biden Rock 'n' Doo-Wop Party starts at 5PM and lasts for 45 minutes, and I could not be more enthralled. mobilize.us/joebiden/event…
Read 17 tweets
8 Oct
This plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, put her on "trial," and thereby overthrow the government of Michigan seems NOT to have been a cop-induced sting operation, but an actual thing. detroitnews.com/story/news/loc…
("Would this 'plot' have existed without instigation by undercover cops?" is always the first question I ask. It seems that the answer is yes in this instance, though we'll learn more details soon.)
(Deleted and retweeted above tweet because I was rushing to class and tripped over my own grammar—wrote "the answer is no" when I meant "the answer is yes.")
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
Republicans hyping a vote-by-mail tutorial by outragedly proclaiming that there are naked ladies in it is ... well, let's just call it shortsighted.
Y'all understand that this isn't Imagine Take Two, right? That it's a primer on how to take concrete steps to avoid having your ballot invalidated, specifically in a crucial swing state where vote by mail is going to be overwhelmingly Democratic?
The more attention the video gets, the more likely it is that Biden wins Pennsylvania. Period. Thirst attention, outrage attention, making fun of Josh Gad for being fat attention. Doesn't matter. Fewer vote-by-mail ballots get invalidated, and Democrats get more votes.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!