Ok, just getting into the West Wing and at the top of episode 3 the president is giving a speech under a banner that says "practical idealism."

This is peak hate-watching.
Elizabeth Moss!
Bradley Whitford’s character just asked the Black guy from Psych to grab a beer in Georgetown after work and the Black guy was all “what kind of bar is this?” and boy oh boy I do NOT miss the “no homo” nineties.
Someone at the bar just called Hill “fairy poppins.” Why does everyone think this guy is gay? What’s happening? What is 1999?
Every woman is so stupid. Except CJ.

They just established that Bradley Whitford’s assistant has the following character trait: When she takes it upon herself to do independent research for her job she tends to find an obscure fact from an unreputable source and run with it.
This time, she read that “in some places in Indonesia they summarily execute people they suspect of witchcraft.”

All this in preparation to host the Indonesian head of state at the White House.

Also, there’s a joke about how difficult Indonesian names are to spell. 🙃
Also, they let CJ be smart and capable, but they had to humble her in the last episode by making her “not understand the census” and making a big deal if her needing Rob Lowe to explain it to her.

Also, it’s “sorcery” not witchcraft. My bad.
I can’t even begin to get into this “call girl” story line with ole girl from A Girlfriend’s Guide to Divorce.
It took seven episodes to introduce the incomparable Stockard Channing as the First Lady!?
I don't know if I can do this supreme court ep right now.
This new ep opens with Bradley Whitford's character trying to convince his female co-worker/assistant (the same one obsessed with Indonesian sorcery) to be his caddy. Their conversation is interrupted when he's served with a subpoena. He uses her back as a desk to sign it.
Paris Geller!
John De Lancie!
Just hit "The Jackal" and lord help me this is the most cringe thing I've ever seen.

Who even thinks up this premise!? It's not even well executed. I hate it so much.
Sorkin writes the women SO SO SO STUPID.

In this one, a female aid to a senior white house staffer is apparently SO clueless (and obsessed with the CALORIE COUNT in a muffin) that she's prattled on about it to the Chief of Staff and the Communications Director.
Credit where credit is due.
Twin Peaks crossover! It's Laura Palmer's mom!
Just learned from a flashback that when Donna, Bradely Whitford's character's assistant, first tried to join Bartlett's campaign, Whitford asks her when her boyfriend broke up with her. Because why else would she be trying to join the campaign?

And of course, Bradley is right.
Oh look, this shiny young prosecutor they're grooming for congress with the *excellent* conviction record has one problem: "He likes white juries for his black defendants."

OOPS!

Bet they'll clean this up. After all: he's just a player in the game.
A “leggy blonde” republican pundit just won an exchange with the deputy press secretary on TV. This followed.
I hate it.

Women are allowed to be smart but only to show that the men who direct their fates are even smarter. They’re like wild horses that are respected for how difficult they are to tame.

But they must be tamed.
The women are constantly surprised, they’re the last to know they’re the butt of a joke, they fall into their own swimming pools fully clothed and forget what direction their own homes are in— only to be pointed in the right direction by random men. It’s remarkable.
I’m losing my mind.

Also, 2 min earlier he repeatedly referred to this woman as “girl.” This “girl” has not only graduated law school, which would make her at least 25, but has completed a Supreme Court clerkship, which probably puts her closer to 30.
“Kitten.”
I'm going to have to stop this thread bc there's just too much. But in today's lunch-time episode a random (Russian?) politician shows up drunk in the WH driveway & it's reported that there's a woman in the car who is either security detail or a "prostitute."
To this, Rob Lowe, who had a whole "save a call girl" story arc asks "is it . . .?" as though there is only 1 sex worker in DC.

Later, when we see this woman, she is dressed in typical office attire and there is literally no reason why anyone would presume she's a sex worker.
Additionally in this ep, Ainsley is written as more competent than Rob Lowe's character, but lest we think women are equal, she undermines her wins by asking to ingest ever carb in every room she's in. Also, she advises the WH press sec to give a reporter a story "bc he's cute."
They’ve said “alabaster skin” so many times.
Women be shopping.
“We don’t have to move to our right if there’s an opportunity to spank the people to our left.”

I take it back. This is a documentary.
Holy crap. watch till the end.

This scene ends “come at us from the left and I’ll own your ass.”

For the uninitiated, the bald guy is supposed to be our protagonist.
Neelix! 🖖🏾
Keiko O’Brien! 🖖🏾
Followed by “the top 1% of wage earners in this country pay for 22% of this country.”

They have more wealth than the bottom 90%, so it sounds like they’re under paying.
A thing this show does is make characters “self aware” about sexism as though that absolves them.
In an earlier ep, Rob Lowe shoots down a woman’s talking point by saying it sounds like a “high school girl” wrote it. She asks, reasonably, if he has a problem w/ girls. He covers by saying yes, when they’re in high school. No one asks why he didn’t say high school boy.
After our white protagonist realizes he’s wrongly accused this Arab man of terrorism, he gives a halfhearted apology saying “my friends would tell you that wasn’t like me.” Then he walks away only to turn around and say: “hey kid. Way to be back at your desk.” 👌🏾
Then the episode ends with:

Having a normal one talking about being white gods at work.
Here’s some I clipped earlier and didn’t post bc I didn’t want to reveal how late I was up watching.

There’s no context that made this remark make sense. It’s just the kind of thing that gets said on this show:
Extreme “vote blue no matter who” vibes.
Again, there was no point to this. There wasn’t a running gag where he couldn’t remember anyone’s name. He didn’t get called out for being rude. They just humiliated the assistant to the chief of staff for fun. It’s as if Sorkin himself just thought of her as “red headed girl.”
It’s the day before Thanksgiving, so yes. There are “Indians in the lobby.”
Watching the HBO reunion special address to Black men by Dule Hill and Sterling Brown and wondering what Black man watching a West Wing reunion special isn't already planning to vote for Biden.
Oh lord Mary Louise Parker. Someday I’ll tell you all about how I hate-watched Weeds.
Modern family dad!
Narrator voice: it was not a valid point.
I’m sorry. The sex work discourse is SO BAD. Mary Louise Parker is on a losing streak. Im dying.
I’ll spare you the video, but in the C plot CJ is mad bc they’re selling guns to some middle eastern folks who “hate women.” The description of gender politics is reductive and insulting but I’m with her on “selling weapons bad.” BUT!
She tries to convince the black female sec of defense to reconsider by playing on her race: “if we had tried selling guns to South Africa 15 years ago you would’ve been livid.”

This is classic West Wing: sanctimonious characters claiming high ground they haven’t earned.
(I bet if they tried to sell guns to some random Black Country 👏🏾that 👏🏾contains 👏🏾women we wouldn’t see CJ on a feminism kick in their defense either.)
“Spandex.”

Like, why? Who is this for?

I promise you there’s no context I’m omitting.
“The only reason you’re not out there [with your FBI team] is bc you’re a woman or something.]
Would you believe me if I told you this wasn’t a scotch commercial?
In the A plot, Leo is testifying abt the president hiding his MS & one of the Republicans questioning him reveals info that was very inculpatory and for some reason the other Republican is mad at him for not disclosing the info that gave them a HUGE advantage bc it’s not fair? 🧐

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 💀🎃Briahna Joy Co-pay 🕸👻

💀🎃Briahna Joy Co-pay 🕸👻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @briebriejoy

21 Oct
Me: Black people are suffering by dozens of measurable metrics there's a link between the party's indifference to our grievances and the fact that our votes are captured.

ChomskyLuvr1996: "Why are you shoehorning idpol into everything?" Image
Solidarity for me but not for thee I guess.

I'm sincerely committed to a multiracial coalition that includes white working class voters. But I'm getting tired of the eye-rolling that emerges from some segment of the left whenever black grievances are up at bat.
This includes leftists who beat their chests saying "just vote" and then "do the work of activism" while scoffing at the idea that a precarious person might reasonably resent being told that climate change is more important than whether they survive the year.
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
“Vibrant.” ImageImage
Bernie Bro stories were like “she called me a heartless neoliberal for not caring that 68,000 people die a year from lack of health insurance.” And credulous reporters would characterize that as “harassment.” Meanwhile: ImageImage
Bernie repeatedly and forcefully disavowed any random acts of online bullying and was held accountable for it anyway. Meanwhile: ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
Anat Shenker-Osorio gives excellent advice here. She points out that “law and order” is a trap set by Trump that serves to keep the base at home. (Also, leaning into right wing framing is immoral). podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/pod…
She also argues that emphasizing Trump is an authoritarian helps him. Instead, he should be described as weak, bumbling and ineffectual. (Interestingly, that is Trump’s approach to Biden).

Prior to the interview, the hosts argue, correctly, that Dems should emphasize policy.
Notably, this is what the left has been saying this whole time.

Stop panicking. Stop blaming the left. Stop using right wing framing.

Start emphasizing policy. Start phone banking.

And the better the policy is the more electable Biden will be.
Read 5 tweets
21 Sep
It was entirely predictable that ppl targeted by the Crime Bill & the "law & order" messaging exploited by Biden/Harris would object to this pair come the general election.

Instead of picking a safer candidate, the Dem establishment pretended records don't matter. Image
By forging ahead with this ticket, the party calculated that they didn't need these votes; a version of 'for every Blue collar voter we lose in Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia.'

But for Black/young/progressive voters.
To many voters, it feels like the party wants to have it both ways. Some folks will cave to the pressure of defeating Trump. Others will abstain out of frustration that their substantive needs -- needs as exigent as 'kids in cages' -- were ignored to advance corporate interests.
Read 5 tweets
14 Sep
Every day on this site Black people appropriately ask that non-Black people not use “POC” when you just mean Black people.

Apparently, a bunch of non-Black people decided it was racist for me to demand the same specificity when talking about voting trends.

Very woke of you.
Team “trust Black women” has logged on. ImageImageImage
The beautiful thing about actually being Black is I don’t rely on a Twitter consensus to judge how I should feel about Blackness.

Knowing who I am and what I believe in feels great. I want that for all of you.
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep
Just starting Twin Peaks for the first time. Highly engaging. A young Trey!

But what is this music!?
Not to step on Cuties discourse, but there are a lot of high school girls in sexual situations with older men in this.

Like, why is the FBI agent making out with Laura Palmer in this dream?
“The Bookhouse Boys”!?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!