There aren't many arguments for supporting Biden that I can respect, but his pledge to end US support for the mass atrocities in Yemen while Trump vetoes congressional attempts to do so is one of them.
Irrelevant. The one who says he'll stop facilitating the single worst mass atrocity in the world has an innately superior position in this area than the one who openly vetoes attempts to do so. Maybe he will, maybe he won't, but he's better on Yemen.
At the very least it's hard to imagine Biden being WORSE than Trump on Yemen. I have a hard time imagining him vetoing a congressional attempt to end US backing for Saudi butchery there.
How Did People Have Conversations Back Before Tech Oligarchs Were There To Police Them?
"Rollouts of corporate & state power collaborating to control speech are not a response to a threat to democracy, they’re a response to a threat to narrative control." medium.com/@caityjohnston…
Twitter has announced the rollout of even more censorship policies in the lead-up to the November US presidential election. “Credible information” here means information from the same mass media outlets who’ve lied to us about every American war.
New social media platforms can't become large unless they collaborate with existing power structures. When they collaborate with existing power structures they begin censoring. The whole system is rigged to funnel human communication en masse into censorship by the powerful.
You hear free market types saying if people don't like big tech censorship they should just start their own social media corporation to compete with it. People have tried that, and always failed, because they don't collaborate with existing power structures. It doesn't work.
There is no free market solution to the problem of internet censorship, because monopolistic tech companies which funnel all online communication into themselves are much too valuable to the powerful. They're not going to let competitors just take away their most prized assets.
Our society is set up to elevate the most miserable and dysfunctional people to the highest positions of influence, which results in their misery and dysfunction being efficiently spread around the world. medium.com/@caityjohnston…
“We are led by the least among us — the least intelligent, the least noble, the least visionary. We are led by the least among us and we do not fight back against the dehumanizing values that are handed down as control icons.”
~ Terence McKenna
The term “super-spreader” has been popping up a lot in mainstream news media in reference to President Trump and his habit of hosting of events without social distancing precautions.
Free Assange,
because the world is growing darker
as the bastards flick the lights off
one by one.
Free Assange,
because the sky is filling with death machines
as mothers weep over small tattered bodies
and the news man talks about rude tweets.
Free Assange,
because they are taking everything from us
and we are becoming voiceless, mindless gear turners
who can only argue about who to bomb next.
US Politics Isn’t ‘Polarized’; It’s In Almost Universal Agreement
"They do not allow for any mainstream discussion of *IF* the oligarchic empire should continue to exist; all their issues, arguments and histrionics revolve around *HOW* it should exist." medium.com/@caityjohnston…
When you look at US politics, it appears as though there are two mainstream political factions that very strongly disagree with one another. “Divided” is a word that comes up a lot. “Polarized” is another.
But beneath all the hurled insults and heated debates, these two factions are actually furiously agreeing with one another. They’re agreeing the entire time.
WaPo Publishes Paranoid Screed Cautioning Readers Not To Let Russia Make Them Paranoid
“Russia and other adversaries may not need to hack the election if they can hack something else: our minds,” writes the Washington Post editorial board. medium.com/@caityjohnston…
So begins a crazy, paranoid Washington Post editorial titled “The U.S. may be safe from foreign interference in this election. But what about perception hacking?”, cautioning readers not to let Russia make them crazy and paranoid.
“Perception hacking”. Apparently term this is the latest fad for the elite liberal commentariat in the category of noises one can make with one’s face in order to sound well-informed about Russian influence operations, from the same line as “kompromat”.