It's a short report on the 24th Session of the Conference of the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention:
US, Canada, NL proposed to add *2* families of chemicals to the OPCW prohibited list (incl. the "Salisbury Novichok");
Russia proposed to add *5* groups!
In the end, a compromise was reached to put *four* new chemicals (or classes) on the list; - the Western states rejected the *fifth*, on the grounds it wasn't "consistent with the guidelines of the Convention" (!?!) - whatever that means ....
So, if the substance identified (but not specified) by OPCW in Navalny's samples is not on the OPCW list, it was not regarded a *Russian* "Novichok" by Western states!
It is either this fifth ("American"?) Novichok - or just another "similar" substance!
As we still don't really understand what game is played, and by whom, over troop movements on both sides of the Donbass, - here's an interesting article by @IgnatiusPost (often a CIA mouthpiece) that deserves some close reading!
"The CIA discovered something scary in October ..."
Translation: the CIA wants us to think they are "scared" (and perhaps ourselves be scared), - but for what reason?
I find it rather unlikely the CIA has real insights into *secret* Russian troop movements (esp. in Russia) ...
Remember how flabbergasted the US was when in 2014 Putin performed a masterclass in geopolitical jiu-jitsu over Crimea?
And the consternation in 2015 when Russia told the US to pleeeease watch their aircraft in Syria as they were now screened by Russian air defense radar?
Not just on Twitter - there are serious attempts, especially in Germany, to blame the 2015 refugee crisis on Putin intending to destabilize the EU internally.
In March 2015 the Nusra-led coalition Jaish al-Fateh conquered Idlib city and consequently captured all of Idlib province incl. Jisr al-Shughour in April and May.
It was the biggest opposition success since the start of the war.
Protasevich's explanation is very specific, referring to information about his flight which indeed appeared in the bomb threat email sent from a fake "Hamas" account.
The aim of the article is to bolster the rationale for why on earth would Russian intelligence blow up a munition depot in Czechia in 2014 (as the evidence-free "hypothesis" runs).
Answer: because the weapons were destined for Ukraine.
Alas, the Bulgarian arms dealer EMCO (who owned at the time parts of the munitions stored in the Czech depot by operator Imex Group) denied they were intended for export to Ukraine.
The farce continues:
Czech police name Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov - the two alleged Skripal assassins - as the Russian agents allegedly behind an explosion at a munitions dump in 2014! #Skripalsaga
They claim they have identified "various passports" the two men carried - but the connection with those explosions sounds rather speculative and more due to the desire to join in the propaganda war against Russia!
The Navalny story now overtakes the Skripal saga in absurdity:
the Western narrative managers have decided to amuse us with exciting new versions of the poisoning, - the Times excells with a theory of a double Novichok attack!