Further evidence that Trump's election travails are based almost entirely on what he says, not what he's done in office. This is an astounding number given the coronavirus.
Those who think the polls are wrong will see this amazing "better off than four years ago" number as strong evidence of a hidden Trump vote that will overwhelm Biden's edge in the polls. How can people give historic high marks to Trump - better than Reagan! - but throw him out?
A related possibility is that Trump really is lagging behind, but much of his deficit against Biden is transitory anger at things he says, fueled by the relentless media campaign against him. It will dissipate and they'll vote more on the "better off than four years ago" feeling.
Enthusiasm is a big factor in polarized base-driven elections. Those hoping Trump will far outperform the polls can take heart from the thought that all this quiet satisfaction with his performance will outweigh the showy Trump-bashing in legacy and social media.
As for whatever truly undecided voters remain, you'd think when it finally comes time to pull the proverbial lever, this high "better off than four years ago" number suggests they're thinking about the entire Trump first term, not just the coronavirus era.
A potential peril for Biden is that he's running as the Generic Democrat, the basement guy, calling those early lids and letting Trump talk himself out of a job - but a lead built that way could prove very ephemeral if swing voters have last-minute second thoughts about Biden.
Harris' disastrous performance in the veep debate could be a significant factor in that scenario. And make no mistake, Pence mopped the floor with her - the media wouldn't still be blubbering about "mainsplaining" if they thought she won or came anywhere near a draw.
It usually wouldn't matter as much, but this time around there are good reasons for people to think Harris would take over very quickly from Biden. If the race is Trump with these "better off than four years ago" numbers vs. Harris, that's not good at all for Democrats.
I still think it's all about the Return to Normal, and Trump's recent campaign hasn't been good at positioning him as the better choice to get us there. He's been signaling more strife, more arguments, more drama, not stabilization and rebuilding.
Pence did as much as any running mate could to turn that around, and if such an amazingly high number of people think Trump scores well on the most important of presidential job performance reviews, it suggests there are plays here that Trump could run for a touchdown.
All Trump really has to do is project resolve, master some details so he can play the kind of hardball Pence did, and convince wavering voters they sure as hell won't be better off in four years under the Abolish the Police Party and their crackpot ideas.
It shouldn't be hard. Everything Biden, Harris, and the rest of the Dems say is about hatred, vengeance, punishment, destroying what's left of the Constitution with stuff like court-packing, all the industries they're planning to kill. There are no happy endings there. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't understand the need for elaborate theories that Pelosi is wasting America's time with this wackadoo 25th Amendment stuff because she's setting up some elaborate plan to replace Biden with Harris after the election.
This is what Nancy Pelosi DOES. She thinks nothing of wasting the time and money of the American people on dingbat political stunts. Remember the impeachment farce, which Dems were pulling right when the coronavirus started flaring up? Not a second thought entered her head.
If Donald Trump had raised alarms about the Rona while Dems were picking your pocket to finance Impeachment Theater, Pelosi would have howled that Trump was fearmongering about a virus to distract from the sacred and solemn impeachment hearings.
Excellent analysis! One of our biggest problems is that people think "democracy," all by itself, is a sufficient check on power. I frankly don't understand how anyone can still believe that, but of course they probably won't be taught otherwise in school.
The disturbing flip side of thinking democracy is a magic talisman against tyranny is the belief that democracy sanctifies power - the essence of majoritarianism. "They can't be dictators if we can vote them out of office!" is one of the most dangerous ideas in the world.
The restraints placed on power are MORE important than the process of choosing who gets to wield it. You would be more free under a tightly restrained hereditary monarch than in a "democracy" with totalitarian centralized power.
Who know if this veep debate will matter more than any of the previous ones, but rarely has a running mate done more to help his ticket than Pence did tonight, and rarely has one hurt her ticket more than Harris.
This debate SHOULD be important because Harris is going to end up in the Oval Office and everyone knows it. It matters a lot that she's a lightweight who can't give a straight answer, credulously repeats every hoax she's ever heard, and thinks China is the top dog nation.
Harris' servility to Communist China is ASTOUNDING. Xi Jinping should send her a hammer and sickle pin as a reward for a job well done. She took Beijing's line every chance she got, on every issue. She even straight-up lied about global opinion surveys about Beijing.
This election is a contest between reality and illusions, including the illusion of perpetual fear. Trump's troubles flow from how he speaks into the social media hall of mirrors, but what he's saying is fundamentally true. Don't underestimate how many people prefer illusions.
As the WSJ put it, "Trump doesn't do nuance." Nuance belongs to the realm of illusion. With enough nuance, the plain meaning of words can be inverted and the truth can be completely obscured. Many Americans are sick to death of getting "nuanced" into ruin.
But many people PREFER illusions - role-playing, virtue signaling, social media freakouts. Cancel culture flows from children achieving illusory "victories" by silencing people they hate, without changing a damn thing about the great social issues they claim to care about.
He'll get roasted for using "coronavirus" and "flu" in the same tweet, but note that he's not saying Covid-19 is "just the flu." He is correctly noting that we need a coping strategy that doesn't involve perpetual lockdowns, because the Rona isn't going away any time soon.
There's some weird new version of Godwin's Law that says if you mention the coronavirus and any lesser disease in the same sentence, you're minimizing the threat of the Rona and dismissing it as "just the flu." We've had more than enough illogical hysteria during this pandemic.
Discussing long-term strategies for dealing with a persistent health issue does not require minimizing the threat of the disease. Nor does observing that it's not as lethal as early projections claimed. Minimizing its threat is wrong, but so is dramatically overstating it.
Remember the hysteria and lunacy from the media over Trump's coronavirus diagnosis, the hatred and death wishes. You do NOT want people who think that way to gain power and take control of your life. Trump is right about fighting back against fear.
The Left WILL vent all that rage and hatred on you and yours, if they gain the power to do so. They're showing you who they really are. The entire Democrat Party is an endless nervous breakdown. Hysterical people tend to lash out at perceived tormentors.
By now it should be crystal clear that the Left isn't kidding around when it unrolls its enemies list and vows to punish everyone and everything it holds responsible for "unfairness" and "injustice." They view government as punitive - a mighty engine for hurting "bad people."