S.C. absentee ballot received by a voter after SCOTUS ruling Monday that witness signatures *are* required. Seems likely to lead to many discarded votes. 
S.C. does not have a process for notifying voters of a missing signature to allow them to ‘cure’ a discarded ballot. lwv.org/newsroom/press…
Election Board records show this ballot was mailed to the voter on Oct 7, two days after the SCOTUS decision. It arrived on Friday.
NYT coverage of the issue nytimes.com/2020/10/05/us/…
The arguments in the case:
-S.C.: witnesses are needed in case we need to investigate ballot fraud.
-lower court: But fraud is nearly non existent, so denied
-Justice Kavanaugh for SCOTUS: overruled, bc voting rules shouldn’t be changed this close to an election.
-S.C.: witnesses are needed in case we need to investigate ballot fraud.
-lower court: But fraud is nearly non existent, so denied
-Justice Kavanaugh for SCOTUS: overruled, bc voting rules shouldn’t be changed this close to an election.
SC does not have partisan voter registration but does provide statistics by race. As of Friday, Black voters requested 28% of mail ballots and led all groups in the rate of returns.
Via @ElectProject
electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-202…
Via @ElectProject
electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-202…
I spoke to SC's Dem chair, Trav Robertson, about this. He said he's aware of several counties where this is a problem: Richland, Georgetown and a couple of others. "It's going to be a problem,'' he said. "We're trying to figure out a way for a cure.''
"We're also trying to undertake a massive voter education program,'' Robertson said. He added that historically, SC began requiring witness signatures "to prevent white people from helping African Americans to cast votes.''
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
