Let's talk about the Hatch Act
The Hatch Act is one of America's most important ethics laws. It prohibits people in government from using their official position for partisan political means. It also prohibits them from using taxpayer dollars to campaign for one side or the other.
In other words, the Hatch Act is meant to keep a separation of church and state between the government and campaigns. In a free and open democracy, the government doesn't use government resources to keep itself in power.
While the Hatch Act applies to most people in the government, like many of our ethics laws, it does not apply to the president or vice president. So no, President Trump cannot violate the Hatch Act. The people who help him with these events, however...
If it seems like you hear about the Hatch Act way more in the Trump Administration than in previous administrations, that's because you do. No administration has ever shown such a wanton disregard for ethics laws.
A dozen senior Trump officials have been investigated by the Office of Special Counsel and found to have violated to the Hatch Act off of CREW complaints alone. Here's a primer: citizensforethics.org/reports-invest…
In an unprecedented move, the Office of Special Counsel declared that Kellyanne Conway's Hatch Act violations were so egregious that she should be removed from federal service citizensforethics.org/news/press-rel…
Just two days ago, a CREW complaint led to Secretary of Agriculture being ordered to reimburse the government for an event about government support for farmers that he turned into a Trump re-election speech citizensforethics.org/news/press-rel…
President Trump, exempt from this law, has taken a cue from dictators and started using the White House as a backdrop for his campaigning. While he's not breaking the law, others certainly are citizensforethics.org/news/press-rel…
In fact, some of them have stepped up their assault on government ethics. But we're still here watching. citizensforethics.org/news/press-rel…
Here's why it matters: if an administration disregards laws meant to prevent them from using the government to keep themselves in power, what other laws will they be willing to violate to keep the president in the White House?
America needs tougher ethics laws, particularly on the president. That's for sure. We've got some ideas, but that's for another thread. For now, the most important thing is to keep the pressure on. Make your voice heard. Let them know you still believe in an ethical government.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Citizens for Ethics

Citizens for Ethics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CREWcrew

7 Oct
“Law and order” … but Trump was impeached for committing high crimes
nytimes.com/2019/12/18/us/…
“Law and order”... but Trump officials have broken the Hatch Act countless times, with no consequences
forbes.com/sites/andrewso…
“Law and order” … but Trump has been violating the Constitution since day one of his presidency
thehill.com/regulation/cou…
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
Tomorrow, Charles Rettig, the Trump appointed IRS commissioner will be testifying before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

We have a few simple questions for him.
One: How can you carry out your duties impartially when you are making six-figures by renting out condos in a Trump property? That’s a major conflict of interest for the person helping Trump hide his tax returns.
citizensforethics.org/charles-rettig…
Two: A tiny change buried in the middle of the CARES Act could bring the Trump Organization and Jared Kushner an unprecedented windfall.

Is the IRS investigating how much taxpayer money went to Trump and Kushner businesses? citizensforethics.org/two-tax-change…
Read 5 tweets
26 Aug
Last night, Trump’s chief of staff told the press that no one outside of Washington cares about the Trump administration’s violations of the Hatch Act.

But if they think no one cares about the law, why is Trump running as a “law and order” president?
With Trump’s selective fixation on “law and order,” he is showing his hand: The phrase is nothing more than a racist dog whistle.

Let’s take a look at his record:
Trump’s business:

Charged with housing discrimintation, defrauding customers, tax evasion and more. It has settled more lawsuits that we can count and is currently under investigation by the Manhattan DA, and the NY AG.
washingtonpost.com/politics/new-y…
Read 9 tweets
20 Aug
When Trump tries to claim he’s the “law and order” president, you really have to wonder — has he read the news about the people involved with his 2016 campaign?
First, there was Michael Flynn, a top aide to Trump's campaign, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia. Trump hired him as national security advisor.
nytimes.com/2020/07/30/us/…
Then there was Trump’s first campaign manager, Paul Manafort, who was sentenced to 47 months in prison for hiding millions of dollars he earned for political consulting in Ukraine.
bbc.com/news/world-us-…
Read 9 tweets
14 Aug
Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf and Acting Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli were invalidly appointed to their positions and are ineligible to serve, according to a GAO report.

That raises serious legal questions. There must be accountability. politico.com/news/2020/08/1…
GAO is referring questions about the legality of Wolf and Cuccinelli’s actions to DHS’ IG, which has been remarkably dormant.

Plus the DHS IG lied about having a PhD, which raises some integrity questions... washingtonpost.com/national/homel…
No matter what the IG finds, DHS is no stranger to flouting the law.

Its multi-pronged attack on civilians at anti-racism protests could be a constitutional violation and raises serious questions about abuse of power.
citizensforethics.org/foia/federal-p…
Read 5 tweets
31 Jul
BREAKING: We just got Jared and Ivanka's financial disclosures. Ivanka made $4 million off the Trump Hotel DC last year. Much more to come.
Ivanka reported that she received $100,001 - $1,000,000 from the trust holding her fashion brand. This is significantly lower than what she reported earning in 2018, but she also reported that the brand ceased operations in July 2018, so how did she make money from it in 2019?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!