1/ An exploration into the role of megafauna, ecosystem functioning and #rewilding is the topic of #rewildingscience today. Can we learn from the Pleistocene to influence today’s world for the better?
2/ As discussed in previous threads, megafauna have been in a state of decline and extinction since the late Pleistocene. Such large animals would surely have an impact on the environment so what are the consequences of their declines on ecosystem function?
3/ Understanding not only why they went extinct but how their loss effects ecosystem functioning is important for many reasons. Arguably the most pressing of which is how their legacy has an impact on the functioning of the current biosphere
4/ Firstly, what is meant by ‘megafauna’? In the context of the paper these are categorised into the following groups: large herbivores (45-999kg), megaherbivores (>1000kg), large carnivores (21.5-99kg), and megacarnivores (>100kg)
5/ The sheer size of these animals would not only have had a direct impact on vegetation, but also interactive effects e.g. landscape of fear. The drop from 50 megaherbivore species to our current 9 worldwide within a depleted range would surely have a trophic impact
6/ What then are the key impacts of their loss? These are split into sections, the first of which is ecosystem physical structure. Browsers, particularly elephants, shape the landscape through destruction of vegetation…
7/ In many ecosystems, these destructive drivers act alongside fire. Adding influences like rainfall and ecosystem productivity, varied environmental states are possible. By removing or adding browsers, shifts in state can occur e.g. a switch from top-down to bottom-up processes
8/ For example, after late Pleistocene megafaunal decline, it has been suggested that there was further inhibition of woody vegetation growth, due to the relationship between megafauna and vegetation (made worse by low CO2), making plants more susceptible to browsing pressure
9/ Spatial and temporal landscape structure can also be influenced by these animals. Strength of megafauna pressure can result in landscapes that are mosaics of grasses, shrubs, and trees due to varied strength in herbivory. This creates a more biodiverse landscape
10/ The afforementioned landscape of fear also plays a role, with Yellowstone being a key example. The reintroduction of wolves seems to have decreased browsing pressure by American elk, resulting in regrowth of willow tree cover and reduced erosion
11/ Loss of these species, therefore, can induce trophic cascades that lead to habitat change and further extinction such as the well-known removal of sea otters allowing sea urchin explosions in kelp forests
12/ The second effect concerns ecosystem biochemistry. Large animals play a disproportionately important role in accelerating biogeochemical cycling. Nutrients that would normally have been locked up for years in leaves and stems are processed through consumption and waste…
13/ Lateral movement of nutrients by larger animals can alter soil structure, soil methane emissions, and affect land albedo and evapotranspiration. This process, alongside browsing pressure can alter the reflective component of habitats, effectively influencing climate change
14/ The ecological role of megafauna is being increasingly discussed in a conservation context. As megafauna numbers continue to decline, it is therefore important to recognise their ecological role and how these losses can be avoided
15/ Beyond this, an opportunity exists to explore how to rebuild the ecosystem functions provided by large animals. Sometimes this can be spontaneous, like the return of brown bear and wolves to some landscapes. But this can also be active…
16/ This particular aspect of large animal reintroduction is highly debated, and it is crucial to discuss the where and when of megafaunal #rewilding in terms of appropriateness and practicality. As the discussion continues, we may see avenues for human-megafauna coexistence
17/ Why is this important? Direct human pressure on megafaunal population are coinciding, once again, with an episode of rapid climate change. Restoring these megafauna and linked trophic cascades may, in places, provide ecological resilience in the face of this climate shift
18/ The more we understand about the megafaunal past, how they are agents of contemporary ecosystem change, and their role in the future, the more likely it is we can provide a framework we can develop and test
19/ please read this paper in full, as I wasn’t able to cover everything within this thread! It is an important read so follow the link here and comment your thoughts below pnas.org/content/pnas/1…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rewilding Science

Rewilding Science Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RewildingS

8 Oct
1/ #Rewildingscience with rewilding as a new framework in management by P. Jepson (2016)

-People can experience ‘ecological boredom’ and show indifference to wildlife issues⬇️

-Rewilding embraces change around current management and reinvigorates 21st century #conservation⬆️
2/ Since ~2008 the number of rewilding articles has shown a sharp incline, highlighting the growing interest in this ‘radical’ form of ecological management. This challenges existing conservation frameworks…
3/ Conservation frames are shaped by scientific technologies, media, management practices and legislative practices. This dictates how we manage the environment. Rewilding could be introduced as a new frame, opening up debate on how nature ‘management’ should be approached
Read 7 tweets
24 Sep
Today in #rewildingscience: Avian winners & losers of rural land abandonment (Regos et al 2016)

The study found
-An overall positive effect on biodiversity ⬆️
-13 shrubland & forest bird species showed an increase ⬆️
-4 ecotone & open-habitat species showed a negative trend ⬇️ Image
The study analysed remotely sensed data-derived maps in combination with bird census data carried out in 2000 and 2010 at both landscape and census plot scale. 2/9 Image
They found a gradient of change from bare ground and open shrubland to closed shrubland and woodland. With closed shrubland increasing by 17% and evergreen and deciduous forest increasing by 14% and 107%. While bare ground decreased by 85% 3/9 Image
Read 10 tweets
23 Sep
1/ Today we take a look at the key points from Arts, Fischer, & René van der Wal (2016) examination of the relationship between rewilding and reintroductions. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/re…

#rewilding #rewildingscience #reintroduction
2/ Approach

Critically review the assumption that reintroductions automatically restore wild places.

by

investigating the relatedness of key concepts – ecological functioning, wilderness experience and natural autonomy in relation to a hypothetical wolf reintroduction
3/ Results

The paper determined that:

Each concept was positively impacted by a wolf reintroduction

However...

The concepts often collide rather than enforce each other
Read 6 tweets
11 Sep
1/ A debate on the approach of management and the distinction between anthropogenic and ‘natural’ landscapes is the topic of #rewildingscience today. This centres around the use of fire in peatland management and how we approach ecosystem understanding
2/ The use of fire in peatland & heaths is steeped in political, social, and economic debate. Whilst it is difficult and, in some cases, inadvisable to tease-out these points from habitat management, it is important to conduct unbiased ecological assessments for certain practices
3/ Here, the authors aim to examine the trade-offs in land-management within peatlands/heaths. “choosing the ‘right’ ecosystem is difficult…in a landscape with a long history of human influence”. Whether that be #rewilding or a combination of practices is still being discussed
Read 25 tweets
4 Sep
1/ A glimpse into Pleistocene park for todays #rewildingscience tweet thread with the article “Born to #Rewild” by Eli Klintisch. This short article delves into the process and thoughts behind the attempts to re-establish the grassland-dominated ecosystem – the mammoth steppe Image
2/ In the mid-90s, Sergey Zimov founded the Pleistocene park, a 14,000-hectare reserve near Chersky. The intention was to test whether large herbivores, such as, elk moose, reindeer, horses and bison – through grazing - could bring back the mammoth steppe landscape
3/ This biome dominated Northern Eurasia and North America for 2m years until the last glacial around 13,000 years ago when it shifted to mossy tundra. Why Zimov felt the need to re-establish this landscape lies in its carbon-trapping properties
Read 16 tweets
28 Aug
1/ We’ve broken with tradition a little today. After last week’s paper ‘Rethinking Rewilding’ got a positive reaction, this week we’re covering a response to that paper by Prior and Ward (2016) #rewilding #rewildingscience Image
2/ Rather than go over last week again, you can check out last weeks thread here
3/ Prior and Ward start by welcoming Jorgensen’s paper and emphasise their belief that the emergence of rewilding within both conservation and popular discourse means that social scientists and humanities scholar have a vital role to play in these debates.
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!