I learned today about a disturbing side effect of the new DOL H-1B wage rules. And it could have a dramatic effect on the American health care system I hadn't previously considered. 1
Because physician salaries are now so elevated under the new rule, DOL has shifted to a national default wage for all H-1B doctors and those seeking green cards - $208,000 per year. All specialties. All geographic areas. Doesn't matter if you're right out of med school or not. 2
This plays out in some crazy ways. Medical residents for example. In teaching hospitals across the country, residents are typically paid $50K to $70K per year. The new reg requires they be paid $208K. 3
A new pediatrician in, as an example, Minneapolis had a prevailing wage of $115K last week. Today - $208K. Most primary care positions pay below $208K in most places, particularly rural America and FQHCs - community health centers, rural health clinics and tribal clinics. 4
Some primary care specialties have 1/3 to 1/2 of the doctors in trying on visas. It's not inconsequential and we rely on those doctors to go to America's medically underserved communities. Psychiatry is 50% international & they're on the front lines dealing with addiction BTW. 5
Family medicine is another occupation that will be hit by the new rule in a serious way. 6
The kicker, however, was told to me by @ejtaub, in a conversation this afternoon. There is a very serious federal statute called the Stark Law which generally limits physicians to being paid the "fair market value." 7
@ejtaub Employers are going to have to violate Stark to comply with the DOL regs. An employer can't just say exceed the market rate by 40 or 50% to make Stephen Miller & the DOL happy. They will have to violate Stark in many cases. Is that something a judge is going to be cool with? 8
@ejtaub Maybe @USDOL before you were doing high fives - - you might have sought comments on this legal disaster. End of thread. 9
@ejtaub @USDOL One more thing. If you're a medical resident or fellow on an H-1B and this affects you, reach out to me please. Same for any post-training doctors who are negatively impacted. We're needing you for the pro bono litigation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with (((Greg Siskind)))

(((Greg Siskind))) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gsiskind

9 Oct
Some very helpful Twitter followers have pointed out something very odd about the new DOL wage data. Would be very interested in @USDOL explaining. 1
@USDOL My app kept coming up with figures that were wildly different than the new DOL data. I know the tool is not precise, but it should be pretty close. In every case, my converter was showing the new wages to be much lower than what the flcdatacenter.com new wage levels show. 2
@USDOL What did I get wrong? Well, maybe the underlying data changed. The wages rose between July and October. Possible, but seemed odd given the low wage inflation we're seeing. 3
Read 10 tweets
6 Oct
DOL is justifying publishing with no notice and comment and with immediate effective date is because there would be a massive rush to file to beat the new wages from coming into effect. Of course, the H-1B lottery is in March. So most employers couldn't game it. Just BS. 16
DOL believes it meets the APA’s notice and comment and effective date requirements because of the national economic emergency. But Trump said we're in a V-shaped recovery. And @NFAP data shows IT unemployment has been unaffected by COVID. 17
@nfap The government just made these same arguments in NAM v DHS to stop the nonimmigrant bans and a judge laughed them out of court. 18
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct
First, this is a final rule being issued without any opportunity for the public to comment. It is also effective immediately. It also didn't go through review with OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs which is normally required. This fails rulemaking 101. 2
[Well I already screwed up making this a proper thread. Oh well, not starting over]

It takes 157 pages of citing biased sources and jumping to very faulty logical conclusions to do something I'm going to summarize in a couple of tweets. 3
Current wage levels:

Level 1 - 17th percentile
Level 2 - 34th percentile
Level 3 - 50th percentile
Level 4 - 67th percentile

Level 1 is an entry level job. For example, a doctor just out of residency training or an accountant just out of a bachelors program. 4
Read 13 tweets
22 Sep
OK, the hearing is over on the DV cases. Here's what I can report. 1
The judge spent the first part of the hearing trying to get a handle on just how many diversity visas have been issued since his order on 9/5 when he told the government to issue visas expeditiously first to plaintiffs and then everyone else. 2
He had been operating under the impression that half of the visas have been issued to the plaintiffs based on the way the govt presented the information. @ckuck clarified to the judge that he’s not considering family members so real number is more like 1/4. 3
Read 10 tweets
22 Sep
The government has filed their report in the DV case. They are saying that 122 diversity visas have been issued to plaintiffs and 1009 in total. That’s only a fraction of the named plaintiffs and there about 45K are waiting on visas all together. Not a serious effort here.
There are 425 named plaintiffs. The government says all but five have been interviewed or scheduled for interviews (we believe most have not actually been interviewed). The govt says 128 people have been denied for reasons unrelated to the proclamations. That’s very suspicious.
Want to bet they are for lacking documents that they would have had plenty of time to provide or correct had these applications been adjudicated when they were supposed to have been?
Read 8 tweets
22 Sep
The Department of Justice is proposing a regulation that will make it even harder to file for political asylum. Here’s my quick rundown of what the rule intends to do. 1
The rule applies to individuals who are in immigration proceedings in front of an immigration judge. The rule is getting a lot of criticism and I’ll retweet some of those in a bit. But here’s roughly what it does. 2
Adds a 15-day deadline from the date of the alien’s first hearing to file an application for asylum or withholding of removal if the person is in an asylum or withholding of removal process. Extensions for good cause are permitted. 3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!