By the way, the hospital lost, the court found the policy was implemented to encourage vaccination and so should be struck.
Quotes in this case are very interesting.
As just one example, this comment on one of @Don_Milton (air expert and doctor) studies (here pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23505369/) showing a 3.4-fold decrease in transmission of particles FROM the wearer.
Dr. McGreer, supporting that masks worked, said the following:
Dr. Henry was another expert in the case, who testified in favour of masks working, including as source control.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just a reminder that the government was not liable during SARS because it argued that it was making policy decisions, not operational ones. So nurses sued their employer.
Getting the science wrong is not a policy decision.
Enjoy.
You can see the Crown liability laid out here, in s. 95 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act. (Also under the CPLA as well if you click through to that Act.)