@ValHoyle No, this is all wrong. What the GOP got great at was developing a media system to sell the narrative that the D Party abandoned the working class, when the accusation involves D's support of GOP policies. And please don't take this the wrong way but the GOP also heavily benefits
@ValHoyle from a Dem Party that doesn't realize its being hunted. So when lines like, "Dems abandoned working people" start to pop up in convos, serious convos, on the Left, the Left assumes they have frank & earnest origins. But they do not. They originate out of the GOP's propaganda
@ValHoyle machine, and every time a well-meaning Dem repeats it, an angel gets their wings. The new version is that the Dem Party "takes Black and Latino voters for granted." I'm beginning to hear this pop up, randomly, everywhere. Strategic timing, bc voters of color are just now reaching
@ValHoyle their zenith of power, really starting to dominate in a serious way Dem party politics and exert serious influence, so it would be very convenient for conventional wisdom like that to develop. I'm working on that one as it develops- trying to stop it in real-time. But the "Ds
@ValHoyle abandoned working people" planted conventional wisdom has been around a long time, so I'm forced to excise it retroactively. Here is how we can expose it as a farce. What policies does the Democratic Party advance/support that are good for working people? When asked this question
@ValHoyle I can immediately and easily start laying them out- they fought for the minimum wage increase- the last one, in 230078, took the GOP there kicking and screaming, and have been trying to get the next one ever since. Can't do it though, bc of the GOP. GOP barely supports A minimum
@ValHoyle wage, let alone raising one. In fact, it is their miserly, greedy approach to wages over the past couple fo decades that have helped starve the American worker of any share of the income gain pie they've instead held only for themselves. And by refusing to allow wage increases
@ValHoyle at the very bottom of the income chain, what they ended up doing is depressing wages at each rung up so that teachers ended up making $12 damn dollars an hour. If instead, they'd have done what Democrats- the party fighting for working Americans wanted to do, and raise min wage
@ValHoyle and tie it to inflation, even waiting for the ridiculously long time they did until the last raise in 2007- then by now, the fed floor would be at least $10 an hour. And you can't pay an EMT or a teacher $12 an hour when the burger flipper makes $10- which is why I'm so excited
@ValHoyle about what the Democratic Party has been doing out west for working Americans for the past decade after realignments out there finally gave them governing power. Because you can look at what they've done out there with their governing trifectas, where Mitch McConnell's brutal &
@ValHoyle heartless American middle-class gutting filibuster can't reach to see which party is working for the American worker and which only cares about the C-suite. Out in CA, WA, OR, and now NV, Dem governing trifectas have brought people living wages, universal health care, paid sick
@ValHoyle and paid family leave so that regular working Joes and Janes could enjoy just a small slice of the prosperity of the last decade. Americans in other states- esp those ruled by the GOP? They got jack shit. And that's all they'll ever get bc when you turn the question around and
@ValHoyle ask a Republican to define what the GOP platform offers for working and middle-class Americans- it isn't higher wages, it isn't improved healthcare, it isn't relief from astronomical tuition or student loan debt. Unless they straight up lie- like Trump does when he pretends there
@ValHoyle is a GOP health care plan and that it covers pre-existing conditions (I mean there was one, it was called Obamacare!). I mean, the GOP has ruled the roost in rural America for 2 decades. Rural America is a shit show and all the policies that gutted it are still the center piece
@ValHoyle of the GOP's platform. What rural America needs is MORE government, not less. They need massive infrastructure investments and intervention. And what they really need is a Dem Party to come in there and tell them the cold hard truth of the caper the GOP has pulled over on them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. All- over the past couple of years a few of you have mentioned creating a Patreon as a means of supporting my work. Up till now, my work has been supported via W-2 employment, but from here on out, I'd like to do it on my own. I hope to bring The Cycle to life as a political
2. analysis/commentary site featuring not only work from me, but from others and especially looking to elevate work from the under-rep'd mixed in w work from people y'all know & love. That stuff is in progress, the prototype/shell of the site is at least live now,
3. but will take some months to get rolling in the format of business. It's a brave, new world for me to divest myself from the safety of a W-2. But I want the freedom to do/say/research whatever I want & that is simply something you cannot get affiliated w an entity. I'm the
1. I've noticed this too. And I have no doubt that A.C.B. both as a woman & devout Catholic felt pressured to have a large family. But I am grateful that she lived in an era where that obligation didn't deprive her "top of the class" brain the opp. to reach its full potential.
2. And I always wonder if women in her position ever stop to realize that "activist courts" that aren't "designed to right every wrong in our public life" are the KEY tool that allowed her to do it. That w/o the very type of jurisprudence she hates, she almost certainly couldn't
3. have achieved the remarkable achievements she has wrought from her life. And so, that means, if she brings a different kind of jurisprudence to the bench, that other people, other groups, and frankly, women, will be denied future opportunities. One of the GOP senators noted
As I explain, most "swing voters" are low info voters. The GOP understands the realities of these voters & is adept at manipulating them psychologically. Facebook being the main conduit.
2. Not only do they essentially justify what happened to @gretchenwhitmer (she asked for it) they fail to understand the perpetrators are terrorists, the act, terrorism- a connection they'd have no trouble making if this was a plan hatched by Muslim terrorists. More importantly,
3. as @richthau walks them through a series of GOP/Q'Anon talking points/ad strategies/conspiracies, they are familiar w every single one. Yet- if Thau was to walk them through some of the most salient current events of the past couple of years- they would likely be hard-pressed
Again, here is the website developer who has done such a great job on my site! @johnson_brad
I'm still very under the weather, fighting hard to get better. I had to really push hard to get this out! I am also pushing out the final TX episode of @ElectionWsphr today- which highlights 3 of the TX races from my House forecast.
1. The WH/Trump/ many congressional Republicans like @mattgaetz have FLOUNTED health & safety guidelines for covid19 - no masks, quarantines, they congregate in large groups.
They hold rallies for god's sake. Almost as soon as that started- they fell in & created a super spread
2. cluster that they are now refusing to let the CDC trace bc they know it will reveal that they tried to avoid testing, hide positive tests, failed to notify people who were positive, and sent the WH Chief of Staff, @MarkMeadows, down to Congress to infect Congress. In addition,
3. their reckless behavior has forced thousands of staffers and support staff in federal buildings as well as journalists to choose between earning a paycheck and risk exposure to a deadly virus. Follow CDC guidelines as I do, as my family does, and I have barely seen my parents
1. Update: we know for sure that 1st time mail voters are much more likely to have their ballots flagged for issues.
We also have a distinct pattern in mail data this cycle. Rs "invented" use of absentee ballots to ⬆️R turnout. Its how they dominated FL elections. Ds got wise
2. to this system over the past couple of cycles & started to up their focus on absentee voting. Where they could, they changed voting laws to allow more mail voting (CA, CO, more recently VA) & once the GOP figured out they'd no longer hold the advantage on this technique THEN
3. they started to try to frame it as risky to fraud. Still, this attack on mail/absentee voting is/was controversial in the party bc the operatives understand how much a role its played to their dominance (bc again, they've been winning by focusing on partisan turnout). When