One of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's wishes is that nobody in America would ever, ever consider packing the Supreme Court... And she had the courage to say that.

Today's Democrats and Republicans don't deserve people like RBG and Scalia.

@JoeBiden @KamalaHarris
npr.org/2019/07/24/744…
"Nine seems to be a good number. It's been that way for a long time," she said, adding, "I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court."
"Several Democratic candidates have indicated an openness, if they were to win the presidency, to adding to the number of justices on the Supreme Court to reduce the power of the current conservative majority. Some would also like to enact term limits for Supreme Court justices."
"The term-limits proposal doesn't worry Ginsburg because she sees it as unrealistic, given that the Constitution specifies life terms for federal judges and because, as she puts it, "Our Constitution is powerfully hard to amend."
"If anything would make the court look partisan," she said, "it would be that one side saying, 'When we're in power we're going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to. That impairs the idea of an independent judiciary"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pradheep J. Shanker

Pradheep J. Shanker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Neoavatara

12 Oct
So, from my friend @haroldpollack and Lindsey Leninger. Good piece, I recommend.

I do have...comments (don't I always?).

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
100%: "A key piece of our professional training involves identifying and addressing the blind spots caused by our beliefs...It’s crucial to do this if we want to build effective partnerships with communities and cultures that differ from our own."
"Most Republicans support mask-wearing and other protective measures. The social capital and deep traditions of service within religious communities are powerful public health assets, as are defining conservative values of personal responsibility."
Read 12 tweets
11 Oct
Since:
1. Definitions no longer matter...
2. We aren't using our brains at all...

I am going to proclaim that David Souter stole a seat for liberals from conservatives, and therefore, the Sotomayor seat is illegitimate.
The best part:

The nine senators voting against Souter included Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. These senators, along with seven others, painted Souter as a right-winger in the mold of Robert Bork.

Wall Street Journal opinion piece called Souter a "liberal jurist"...
"... and said Rudman took "pride in recounting how he sold Mr. Souter to gullible John Sununu as a confirmable conservative. They both sold the judge to Bush, who wanted above all else to avoid a confirmation battle."

wsj.com/articles/SB951…
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
If having a seat open, and having the President appoint someone, and then the Senate confirm or deny...is court packing...

Oy vey.
Literally anyone that says that appointing someone when a seat is OPEN, and then have the Senate confirm or reject, is COURT PACKING...

...is someone that should never be trusted on any issue ever, because they are willing to lie and twist facts to their own needs anytime.
There IS a case to be made against this, but it is NOT COURT PACKING.

It is NORM BREAKING.

There is a legitimate argument that civility demands norms, and breaking norms undermines civility. And a system without civility will eventually fall apart.
Read 9 tweets
11 Oct
What this weekend has proven to me is...many, many liberals don't have a clue what court packing is...they just use it as a catch all for "Anything we don't like regarding judges".
I have a lot of problems with the judiciary:
1. They overstep their bounds.
2. Lifetime appts are just...bad.
3. National orders from local federal judges.
4. Not giving judges a full vote on the senate floor (true for Garland, true for Obama judges...and true for Bush judges).
But none of these things...none of them...are 'court packing'.

NONE OF THEM.

Court packing is something that autocratic demagogues do. It is something that happens in banana republics, and third world failed states.
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
I think we are really seeing different waves. The first wave was NY/NJ. The second was this summer with AZ/CA/TX/FL getting hit. Right now the epicenter is the northern central region, with WI, IL, OH. TX, CA, FL have lot of cases through out.
This is another way to visualize it.
And another...
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
Facts are not Bouie's strong suit...he picks a narrative, and then uses his extensive talents to lie about it.
Bouie acts as if installing left wing judges hasn't been critical to the liberal agenda since Franklin Delano Roosevelt's first election...

...in 1932.

We are talking almost NINE DECADES.
He also brings up the gambit about the DC circuit court, which never, ever had any chance of happening.

Instead, Dems are bringing up court packing and the filibuster...which both could EASILY happen. Who is the bigger threat then?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!