So, from my friend @haroldpollack and Lindsey Leninger. Good piece, I recommend.

I do have...comments (don't I always?).

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
100%: "A key piece of our professional training involves identifying and addressing the blind spots caused by our beliefs...It’s crucial to do this if we want to build effective partnerships with communities and cultures that differ from our own."
"Most Republicans support mask-wearing and other protective measures. The social capital and deep traditions of service within religious communities are powerful public health assets, as are defining conservative values of personal responsibility."
"Our training reminds us that winning people, through relationships and engagement, is more important than winning arguments on Twitter or TV. We must build and sustain these relationships for the long haul. In the fight against covid-19, and beyond, we’re going to need them.""
Good piece, except it certainly ignores major issues.

First, there were some protests where easily less than half of protesters did NOT wear masks. This was especially true in MN.

Another: Atlanta. Here are just a few pictures. Less than half of people were wearing them.
It has been a common statement that BLM protesters wore masks, but that was AFTER criticism started, not at the beginning. At the beginning, first several weeks in fact, police did nothing about protests where most people did not wear masks. That did change by the end of June.
Third, the credibility of experts was more than just partisan. Early in the epidemic, leaders such as Fauci and even politicians like Trump, Cuomo, and Pelosi talked DOWN the use of masks. Then, when we finally admitted that was wrong, tens of thousands were already dead.
Even at this late date, we have not admitted the role that transportation hubs, like the New York City subway, played in seeding places like New York, or how keeping the NYC airports open seeded the rest of the country.
To compound this, liberals seem to be willing to make exceptions when it is convenient. They are ok with strict restrictions on religious groups (see Churches in CA, Jewish groups in NY) but willing to ignore the same when it is in their interest (The George Floyd funerals).
We have Trump behaving badly, and getting deserved blame. But when we call out Nancy Pelosi for going to a hair salon without a mask...some how the Left views THAT as unfair, and that she must have been tricked into...not wearing a mask.
And lastly, there are vaccines. If the liberal push back on vaccines isn't evidence that Left wing conspiracy theories can also result in deaths, nothing is. The TDS in regards to vaccines IS going to cause people to die.

Very few on the Left have admitted that this could result in many deaths. That, too, is a real, not imagined, double standard.

Until we call balls and strikes both ways, fairly, none of this can be solved, because nobody has the credibility to be believed consistently.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pradheep J. Shanker

Pradheep J. Shanker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Neoavatara

11 Oct
Since:
1. Definitions no longer matter...
2. We aren't using our brains at all...

I am going to proclaim that David Souter stole a seat for liberals from conservatives, and therefore, the Sotomayor seat is illegitimate.
The best part:

The nine senators voting against Souter included Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. These senators, along with seven others, painted Souter as a right-winger in the mold of Robert Bork.

Wall Street Journal opinion piece called Souter a "liberal jurist"...
"... and said Rudman took "pride in recounting how he sold Mr. Souter to gullible John Sununu as a confirmable conservative. They both sold the judge to Bush, who wanted above all else to avoid a confirmation battle."

wsj.com/articles/SB951…
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
One of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's wishes is that nobody in America would ever, ever consider packing the Supreme Court... And she had the courage to say that.

Today's Democrats and Republicans don't deserve people like RBG and Scalia.

@JoeBiden @KamalaHarris
npr.org/2019/07/24/744…
"Nine seems to be a good number. It's been that way for a long time," she said, adding, "I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court."
"Several Democratic candidates have indicated an openness, if they were to win the presidency, to adding to the number of justices on the Supreme Court to reduce the power of the current conservative majority. Some would also like to enact term limits for Supreme Court justices."
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
If having a seat open, and having the President appoint someone, and then the Senate confirm or deny...is court packing...

Oy vey.
Literally anyone that says that appointing someone when a seat is OPEN, and then have the Senate confirm or reject, is COURT PACKING...

...is someone that should never be trusted on any issue ever, because they are willing to lie and twist facts to their own needs anytime.
There IS a case to be made against this, but it is NOT COURT PACKING.

It is NORM BREAKING.

There is a legitimate argument that civility demands norms, and breaking norms undermines civility. And a system without civility will eventually fall apart.
Read 9 tweets
11 Oct
What this weekend has proven to me is...many, many liberals don't have a clue what court packing is...they just use it as a catch all for "Anything we don't like regarding judges".
I have a lot of problems with the judiciary:
1. They overstep their bounds.
2. Lifetime appts are just...bad.
3. National orders from local federal judges.
4. Not giving judges a full vote on the senate floor (true for Garland, true for Obama judges...and true for Bush judges).
But none of these things...none of them...are 'court packing'.

NONE OF THEM.

Court packing is something that autocratic demagogues do. It is something that happens in banana republics, and third world failed states.
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
I think we are really seeing different waves. The first wave was NY/NJ. The second was this summer with AZ/CA/TX/FL getting hit. Right now the epicenter is the northern central region, with WI, IL, OH. TX, CA, FL have lot of cases through out.
This is another way to visualize it.
And another...
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
Facts are not Bouie's strong suit...he picks a narrative, and then uses his extensive talents to lie about it.
Bouie acts as if installing left wing judges hasn't been critical to the liberal agenda since Franklin Delano Roosevelt's first election...

...in 1932.

We are talking almost NINE DECADES.
He also brings up the gambit about the DC circuit court, which never, ever had any chance of happening.

Instead, Dems are bringing up court packing and the filibuster...which both could EASILY happen. Who is the bigger threat then?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!